WANG Long, ZHANG Lianke, MA Yiming, et al. Influence of Engineering Disturbance on Soil Anti-Erodibility and Anti-Scourability of Loess[J]. 2021, 35(4): 14-20.
DOI:
WANG Long, ZHANG Lianke, MA Yiming, et al. Influence of Engineering Disturbance on Soil Anti-Erodibility and Anti-Scourability of Loess[J]. 2021, 35(4): 14-20. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.04.003.
Influence of Engineering Disturbance on Soil Anti-Erodibility and Anti-Scourability of Loess
In order to study the influence of engineering disturbance on the soil anti-erodibility and anti-scourability of loess
taking Beishan
Chengguan District
Lanzhou City as the study area
the undisturbed soils were sampled from four plots: 1-year filled plot (T1a)
5-year filled plot (T5a)
7-year dug plot (W7a) and natural grassland plot (C). In the laboratory
the dry-wet sieve method was used to determine the soil aggregate related indicators to study the soil anti-erodibility
and the anti-scour trough was used to study the soil anti-scourability
and the factors affecting the soil anti-erodibility and anti-scourability were analyzed. The results showed that the mean weight diameter of soil water-stable aggregates (MWDw) and the proportion of aggregates>0.25 mm (w(δ>0.25)w) of the surface layer (0—10 cm) of each sample surface showed C>W7a>T5a>T1a. The soil percentage of aggregates destruction (PAD) showed T1a>T5a>W7a>C. The average of soil water stable aggregates fractal dimension (Dw) in the surface layer of dug and filled plots was 2.82
the Dw of C plot was 2.74. The anti-erodibility of the surface layer soil of the C was significantly stronger than those of the dug and filled sites. The MWDw and w(δ>0.25)w of the middle and lower soil (10—20 cm and 20—30 cm) of the T5a and W7a plots were significantly lower than those of the surface layer soil. The surface soil anti-erosion coefficients of each sample showed W7a>C>T5a>T1a
and the values of W7a and C sample plots were relatively close. Soil electrical conductivity
organic matter and root system were the main factors affecting soil anti-erodibility and soil anti-scourability. In addition
soil biological crusts could also affect soil anti-scourability. These factors are closely related to the shelving years of dug and filled plots. This means
these factors gradually change as the shelving time of dug and filled plots increases
which is beneficial to the increase of MWDw and w(δ>0.25)w
and the decrease of PAD of disturbed soil
and the scouring intensity of surface soil is close to that of natural grassland. Engineering disturbance would significantly reduce the soil anti-erodibility and soil anti-scourability of loess
and necessary water and soil conservation measures should be taken to reduce the risk of soil erosion.
Wang Y, Chen J, Gu W, et al. Earthworm activities increase the leaching of salt and water from salt-affected agricultural soil during the wet-dry process under simulated rainfall conditions[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2016,52(3):323-330.
Knapen A, Poesen J, Galindo-Morales P, et al. Effects of microbiotic crusts under cropland in temperate environments on soil erodibility during concentrated flow[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2007,32(12):1884-1901.
Seitz S, Nebel M, Goebes P, et al. Bryophyte-dominated biological soil crusts mitigate soil erosion in an early successional Chinese subtropical forest[J].Biogeosciences,2017,14(24):5775-5788.