

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 中国科学院水库水环境重点实验室, 中国科学院重庆绿色智能技术研究院,重庆,400714
2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
Published:2021
移动端阅览
LI Wenjuan, ZHU Kai, RAN Yiguo, et al. Effects of Land-use Types and Off-season Water-level Fluctuation on Component Characteristics of Soil Active Organic Carbon[J]. 2021, 35(2): 178-183.
LI Wenjuan, ZHU Kai, RAN Yiguo, et al. Effects of Land-use Types and Off-season Water-level Fluctuation on Component Characteristics of Soil Active Organic Carbon[J]. 2021, 35(2): 178-183. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.024.
为了研究消落带不同土地利用类型和水淹强度下土壤活性有机碳组分特征及其主要的影响因子,选取不同海拔高程(水淹强度)与不同土地利用类型的消落带土壤为研究对象,定量解析土地利用方式与水淹强度对三峡水库消落带土壤活性有机碳组分的影响,并分析土壤活性有机碳与土壤理化性质之间的关系。结果表明,消落带土壤活性有机碳含量总体上随着水淹强度的增强而减小。土地利用、水淹强度及其交互作用对土壤活性有机碳影响的解释度分别为22.1%,13.7%,9.3%;土壤微生物生物量碳主要受土地利用、土地利用与淹水强度交互作用的影响,对土壤微生物生物量碳影响对应的解释度分别为3.9%,0.6%;土壤可溶性有机碳与土壤颗粒有机碳主要受淹水强度的影响,其方差解释度分别为65.1%,5.5%。多元因子分析(MFA)结果表明,土壤活性有机碳组分MBC含量主要与EC具有显著的负相关关系,而不同水淹强度可能影响土壤理化性质中TN和C:N,进而影响土壤活性有机碳组分DOC分布。土壤POC含量与SOC含量呈显著正相关,POC可被用来衡量消落带不同水淹强度下有机碳库变化的敏感性指标。
In order to determine the effects of land-use types and dam-triggered flooding intensity on soil active organic carbon fractions and identify the main influencing factor in the riparian zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir
soils from different flood intensities and land-use types were collected as study objects and were used to quantitatively analyze soil active organic carbon fractions
while the relationships between soil active organic carbon fractions and soil physical and chemical properties were analyzed. The results showed that the content of soil active organic carbon decreased with the increase of flooding intensity. The land-use types
flooding intensity
and their interaction explained by 22.1%
13.7%
and 9.3% respectively
on soil organic carbon variation. Soil microbial biomass carbon was mainly affected by land-use types and the interaction between land-use types and flooding intensity
and their variation partitioning for the effects on soil microbial biomass carbon were 3.9% and 0.6%
respectively. Soil dissolved organic carbon and soil particulate organic carbon were mainly affected by the dam-triggered flooding intensity
and the explanations for their variation partitioning were 65.1% and 5.5%
respectively. Multiple factor analysis showed that significant correlations between the MBC content of soil active organic carbon and soil electrical. However
Water flooding intensity might affect TN and C:N in soil properties
and further affect the distribution of DOC. Soil POC content was significantly positively correlated with SOC content
and POC can be used as an indicator to measure the flooding intensity changes of organic carbon pool in the riparian zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir.
Oliveira D M d S, Paustian K, Cotrufo M F, et al. Assessing labile organic carbon in soils undergoing land use change in brazil:A comparison of approaches[J].Ecological Indicators,2017,72:411-419.
王岩松,李梦迪,朱连奇.土壤有机碳库及其影响因素的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(32):123-131.
简兴,翟晓钰,王喻,等.土地利用方式改变对湿地土壤总有机碳与可溶性有机碳的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2020,32(3):475-482.
Kayranli B, Scholz M, Mustafa A, et al. Carbon storage and fluxes within freshwater wetlands:A critical review[J].Wetlands,2009,30(1):111-124.
Craft C. Biogeochemistry of wetlands:Science and applications.Soil Science Society of America Journal,2008,73(2).DOI:10.2136/sssaj2008.0013br.
展鹏飞,刘振亚,郭玉静,等.不同放牧方式下高寒草甸土壤碳组分的对比研究[J].土壤,2018,50(3):543-551.
周晨霓,任德智,马和平,等.西藏色季拉山两种典型天然林分土壤活性有机碳组分与土壤呼吸特征研究[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(2):557-563.
张蛟,崔士友,胡帅栋,等.水稻种植对沿海滩涂土壤有机碳及碳库管理指数的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2020(3):107-112.
连玉珍,庄朝飞,仇晓玉,等.土地利用方式对土壤活性有机碳及碳库管理指数的影响[J].高原农业,2020,4(1):26-33.
龚月月,朱新萍,李典鹏,等.不同土地利用方式下干旱区湿地土壤活性有机碳组分特征[J].草业科学,2019,36(8):1944-1952.
高俊琴,徐兴良,张锋,等.水分梯度对若尔盖高寒湿地土壤活性有机碳分布的影响[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(3):126-131.
柴雪思,雷利国,江长胜,等.三峡库区典型消落带土壤微生物生物量碳、氮的变化特征及其影响因素探讨[J].环境科学,2016,37(8):2979-2988.
沈玉娟,赵琦齐,冯育青,等.太湖湖滨带土壤活性有机碳沿水分梯度的变化特征[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(6):1119-1124.
Zhu K, Ma M H, Ran Y G, et al. In mitigating CO
2
emission in the reservoir riparian:The influences of land use and the dam-triggered flooding on soil respiration.Soil and Tillage Research,2020,197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104522.
沈宏,曹志洪,胡正义.土壤活性有机碳的表征及其生态效应[J].生态学杂志,1999,18(3):3-5.
Cheng H, Chen C D, Wu S J, et al. Emergy evaluation of cropping, poultry rearing, and fish raising systems in the drawdown zone of three gorges reservoir of china[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,144:559-571.
叶飞.三峡库区消落带土壤氮循环关键过程微生物群落特征研究[D].重庆:中国科学院大学(中国科学院重庆绿色智能技术研究院),2018.
程辉.不同土地利用方式对三峡库区消落带库湾生态系统的影响研究[D].重庆:中国科学院大学(中国科学院重庆绿色智能技术研究院),2017.
张仕吉,项文化,孙伟军,等.湘中丘陵区不同土地利用方式对土壤有机碳和微生物量碳的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(2):222-227.
杨秀才,王小利,王雪雯,等.贵州典型岩溶区土地利用对土壤有机碳及微生物量碳的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2020,48(4):48-53.
严登华,王刚,金鑫,等.滦河流域不同土地利用类型土壤微生物量C、TN、TP垂直分异规律及其影响因子研究[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(8):1844-1849.
Woloszczyk P, Fiencke C, Elsner D C, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns in soil organic carbon, microbial biomass and activity under different land-use types in a long-term soil-monitoring network.Pedobiologia,2020,80:150642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2020.150642.
元炳成.紫花苜蓿改良盐渍土对土壤微生物活性和养分含量的影响[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(3):415-419.
贾国梅,牛俊涛,席颖.三峡库区消落带湿地土壤有机碳及其组分特征[J].土壤,2015,47(5):926-931.
乐艺,张晓雅,高俊琴,等.模拟干湿交替对若尔盖高寒湿地土壤呼吸及可溶性碳氮稳定性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):81-87.
Qualls R G. Comparison of the behavior of soluble organic and inorganic nutrients in forest soils[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2000,138(1/3):29-50.
杨合龙,孙宗玖,范燕敏,等.短期放牧对昭苏草甸草原土壤活性有机碳组分的影响[J].草业科学,2013,30(12):1926-1932.
方华军,杨学明,张晓平,等.东北黑土区坡耕地表层土壤颗粒有机碳和团聚体结合碳的空间分布[J].生态学报,2006,26(9):2847-2854.
贺秀斌,鲍玉海.三峡水库消落带土壤侵蚀与生态重建研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(4):160-168.
刘梦云,常庆瑞,齐雁冰,等.黄土台塬不同土地利用土壤有机碳与颗粒有机碳[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(2):218-226.
0
Views
974
下载量
7
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621