FENG Mengdie, CHEN Zhanpeng, HE Binghui, et al. Hydraulic Characteristics Related to Karst Yellow Soil Detachment Capacity Under Different Bulk Densities[J]. 2021, 35(2): 1-7.
DOI:
FENG Mengdie, CHEN Zhanpeng, HE Binghui, et al. Hydraulic Characteristics Related to Karst Yellow Soil Detachment Capacity Under Different Bulk Densities[J]. 2021, 35(2): 1-7. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.001.
Hydraulic Characteristics Related to Karst Yellow Soil Detachment Capacity Under Different Bulk Densities
Flume experiments were conducted with the combinations of five flow rates (20
30
40
50
and 60 L/min) to clarify the effects of hydraulic characteristics on yellow soil detachment capacity (Dc) under different bulk densities (1.06
1.15
1.18
and 1.21 g/cm3) in karst area
and establish the prediction model for Dc. The results showed that both flow rate and bulk density significantly affected Dc. When the bulk density was 1.06 g/cm3
Dc increased with the flow rate as a power function
while Dc increased with the flow rate as a linear function under other higher bulk density conditions. Under the same flow condition
Dc decreased with the increase of bulk density
and the reduction trend was more obvious under the higher flow condition. Power functions could be used to describe the relationships between Dc and shear stress (τ)
stream power (ω)
unit stream power (P)
and unit energy (E)
respectively
while τ showed the best predictability (R2=0.96). The erodibility values (Kτ
Kω
KP
and KE) and critical values (τC
ωC
PC
and EC) corresponding to hydraulic parameters all presented decreased trend with the increasing bulk density
and these erodibility values were negatively linearly correlated with bulk density. The results will provide theoretical basis for understanding the mechanism of soil erosion in karst area and establishing soil erosion process models.
Moore I D, Burch G J. Modeling erosion and deposition:Topographic effects[J].Transactions of the ASAE,1986,29:1624-1630.
Zhang G H, Liu B Y, Nearing M A, et al. Soil detachment by shallow flow[J].Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers,2002,45(2):351-357.
Wang Y, Cao L X, Fan J B, et al. Modelling soil detachment of different management practices in the red soil region of China[J].Land Degradation and Development,2017,28:1496-1505.
Hairsine P B, Rose C W. Modeling water erosion due to overland flow using physical principles, 2. Rill flow[J].Water Resources Research,1992,28:245-250.
Zhang G H, Tang K M, Zhang X C. Temporal variation in soil detachment under different land uses in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2009,34(9):1302-1309.
Foster G R, Huggins L F, Meyer L D. A laboratory study of rill hydraulics:Ⅱ. Shear stress relationships[J].Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers,1984,27:797-804.
Hairsine P B, Rose C W. Modeling water erosion due to overland flow using physical principles, 1. Sheet flow[J].Water Resources Research,1992,28:237-243.
Morgan R P, Quiton J N, Smith R E, et al. The European soil erosion model (EUROSEM):Adynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1998,23:527-544.
Nearing M A, Simanton J R, Norton L D, et al. Soil erosion by surface water flow on a stony, semiarid hillslope[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1999,24:677-686.
Zhang G H, Liu B Y, Liu G B, et al. Detachment of undisturbed soil by shallow flow[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2003,67:713-719.
Wang B, Zhang G H, Shi Y, et al. Effect of natural restoration time of abandoned farmland on soil detachment by overland flow in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Earth Surface Processes Landforms,2013,38:1725-1734.
Wang B, Zhang G H, Shi Y, et al. Soil detachment by overland flow under different vegetation restoration models in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Catena,2014,116:51-59.
Zhang G H, Liu G, Wang G, et al. Effects of patterned Artemisia capillaris on overland flow velocity under simulated rainfall[J].Hydrological Processes,2012,26(24):3779-3787.
Bagnold R A. An approach to the sediment transport problem for general physics[M].Washington:U.S. Government Printing Office,1966:422.
Al-Hamdan O Z, Pierson F B, Nearing M A, et al. Concentrated flow erodibility for physically based erosion models:Temporal variability in disturbed and undisturbed rangelands[J].Water Resources Research,2012,48(7):W07504.
Li T Y, Li S Y, Liang C, et al. Erosion vulnerability of sandy clay loam soil in southwest China:Modeling soil detachment capacity by flume simulation[J].Catena,2019,178:90-99.
Xiao H, Liu G, Liu P L, et al. Response of soil detachment rate to the hydraulic parameters of concentrated flow on steep loessial slopes on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Hydrological Processes,2017,31:2613-2621.
Wang D D, Wang Z L, Shen N, et al. Modeling soil detachment capacity by rill flow using hydraulic parameters[J].Journal of Hydrology,2016,535:473-479.
Shen N, Wang Z L, Zhang Q W, et al. Modelling soil detachment capacity by rill flow with hydraulic variables on a simulated steep loessal hillslope[J].Hydrology Research,2019,50(1):85-98.
Nearing M A, Lane L J, Lopes V L. Soil erosion research methods[M].2nd Ed. Delray Beach:Soil and Water Conservation Society and St. Lucie Press,1994:127-156.
Zhu J C, Gantzer C J, Anderson S H, et al. Comparison of concentrated-flow detachment equations for low shear stress[J].Soil Tillage Research,2001,61:203-212.