Effect of Compost of Corn Straws Returning Under Natural Rainfall on Nitrogen Runoff Losses in a Slope Farmland of Small Watershed in Central Yunnan Province

DAI Li; LI Taixing; WANG Keqin; SONG Yali; PEI Yile; LI Kai; ZHANG Qian

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effect of Compost of Corn Straws Returning Under Natural Rainfall on Nitrogen Runoff Losses in a Slope Farmland of Small Watershed in Central Yunnan Province

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Effect of Compost of Corn Straws Returning Under Natural Rainfall on Nitrogen Runoff Losses in a Slope Farmland of Small Watershed in Central Yunnan Province
- Vol. 35, Issue 1, Pages: 1-8(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西南林业大学生态与环境学院,昆明,650224
  2. 云南省玉溪市水土保持工作站,云南,玉溪,653100
  3. 云南省玉溪市红塔区水土保持工作站,云南,玉溪,653100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.001
  CLC： S157.1
- Published：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
DAI Li, LI Taixing, WANG Keqin, et al. Effect of Compost of Corn Straws Returning Under Natural Rainfall on Nitrogen Runoff Losses in a Slope Farmland of Small Watershed in Central Yunnan Province[J]. 2021, 35(1): 1-8.
DOI：

DAI Li, LI Taixing, WANG Keqin, et al. Effect of Compost of Corn Straws Returning Under Natural Rainfall on Nitrogen Runoff Losses in a Slope Farmland of Small Watershed in Central Yunnan Province[J]. 2021, 35(1): 1-8. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.001.

摘要

为探究自然降雨下不同堆沤方式秸秆还田对小流域坡耕地径流泥沙及氮素流失的影响，以滇中二龙潭流域坡耕地为研究对象，设置9种不同玉米秸秆堆沤方式，分别为CK及8种处理，各处理包括2种秸秆还田量（0.75，1.5 kg/m2）、2种秸秆粒度（1，5 cm）、2种秸秆堆沤方式（水或水与尿素堆沤），研究烤烟坡耕地产流产沙及氮素流失特征。结果表明：（1）在4场具有典型产流的降雨中，施用较高秸秆还田量（1.5 kg/m2）和粗颗粒秸秆（5 cm），均可有效减少坡耕地产流产沙量（10.06%~38.60%和10.07%~38.60%）；（2）施用较低秸秆还田量（0.75 kg/m2）、粗颗粒秸秆（5 cm）及未添加尿素堆沤的秸秆径流TN、NO3--N浓度低于施用高秸秆还田量（1.5 kg/m2）、细颗粒秸秆（1 cm）及添加尿素堆沤的处理（1.96%~32.79%和3.97%~40.89%）；（3）各处理下NO3--N/TN、NH4+-N/TN、PN/TN分别为63.64%~86.18%，5.31%~13.86%和5.33%~25.80%，表明坡耕地地表径流氮素主要流失形式为NO3--N，溶解态氮是径流中的主要氮素污染物；（4）施用较低秸秆还田量（0.75 kg/m2）、粗颗粒（5 cm）秸秆、未加尿素堆沤的秸秆，泥沙TN流失浓度降低（16.87%~48.15%）；（5）施用较高秸秆还田量、粗颗粒秸秆及未添加尿素堆沤可有效降低滇中坡耕地氮素的流失风险（0.32%~35.05%和54.52%~77.23%）。TN径流和泥沙流失中，以径流输出为主，占TN流失量的50.09%~71.67%。为了减少该流域氮素流失量，可选择施用较高秸秆还田量（1.5 kg/m2）和粗颗粒（5 cm）秸秆，并依据烤烟不同生长期的吸收情况和土壤养分情况等选择少量或不添加尿素堆沤进行秸秆还田。

Abstract

To explore different compost methods of straw returning on runoff

sediment and nitrogen losses in small watershed

a slope farmland in Erlongtan watershed in central Yunnan Province was chose as research object. Nine different compost methods of corn straw returning were set up: CK and 8 treatments. Each treatment included two straw return amounts to the field (0.75

1.5 kg/m2)

two straw particle sizes (1

5 cm)

two straw heap retting methods with urea reactor (water or water and urea stacking). In this study

the characteristics of runoff

sediment and nitrogen losses in a flue-cured tobacco slope farmland were studied. The results showed that: (1) In the 4 rainfalls with typical runoff

the application of higher straw return amount (1.5 kg/m2) and coarse grain straw (5 cm) could effectively reduce runoff and sediment losses in the slope farmland (10.06% ~ 38.60% and 10.07% ~ 38.60%). (2) The concentrations of total nitrogen (TN) and NO3--N in runoff under the application of lower straw return amount (0.75 kg/m2)

coarse grain straw (5 cm)

and compost with no urea were lower than those with higher straw amount

fine grain straw

and compost with urea (1.96% ~ 32.79% and 3.97% ~ 40.89%). (3) The proportions of NO3--N/TN

NH4+-N/TN and PN/TN were 63.64% ~ 86.18%

5.31% ~ 13.86% and 5.33% ~ 25.80%

respectively

and the main form of nitrogen loss in runoff on slope farmland was NO3--N

dissolved nitrogen was the main nitrogen pollutant in runoff. (4) TN losses concentration of sediment with the application of lower straw return amount (0.75 kg/m2)

coarse grain straw (5 cm)

and compost with no urea decreased (16.87% ~ 48.15%). (5) TN losses of runoff and sediment with the application of higher straw return amount

coarse grain straw and compost with no urea could effectively reduce the risk of nitrogen loss in the slope farmland in central Yunnan province (0.32% ~ 35.05% and 54.52% ~ 77.23%). Among TN runoff and sediment loss

runoff output was the main factor

accounting for 50.09% ~ 71.67% of TN runoff. In order to reduce the nitrogen losses in this watershed

higher straw returning amount (1.5 kg/m2) and coarse grain straw (5 cm) was recommended. Small or compost with no urea also could be applied according to different growth periods of flue-cured tobacco absorption and soil nutrient conditions.

关键词

Keywords

references

王满莹.坡耕地水土流失治理方案设计[J].农业灾害研究,2015,5(6):45-47.

杨子生,贺一梅.中国西南边疆山区耕地水土流失研究:以云南省为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(1):1-7.

赵成,顾小华,姜宏雷,等.云南省坡耕地现状及水土流失综合治理探索[J].中国水土保持,2015(4):11-12.

吕玉娟,彭新华,高磊,等.红壤丘陵岗地区坡地产流产沙特征及影响因素研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):19-23.

王伟,贺莉莎.云南省坡耕地现状调查及分析[J].中国水土保持,2019(4):20-23.

邓龙洲,张丽萍,范晓娟,等.不同雨强和坡度下侵蚀性风化花岗岩母质坡地产流产沙特征[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(17):143-150.

雷秀美,王飞,周碧青,等.长期施肥对稻田土壤可溶性有机氮和游离氨基酸剖面分异的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2019,38(7):1550-1559.

姚金玲,张克强,郭海刚,等.不同施肥方式下洱海流域水稻-大蒜轮作体系氮磷径流损失研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(11):2287-2296.

杨娟,王昌全,白根川,等.秸秆还田下"麦-稻"轮作生产生命周期能耗及温室气体排放[J].农业环境科学学报,2015,34(1):196-204.

张永强,张晓飞,周宁,等.我国化肥投入的区域优化配置研究:基于农业增产与环境保护视角[J].资源开发与市场,2017,33(2):169-173.

郑海睿,骆静梅,刘笑彤,等.秸秆还田量对植物寄生线虫群落的影响[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(6):1725-1731.

郭梨锦,曹凑贵,张枝盛,等.耕作方式和秸秆还田对稻田表层土壤微生物群落的短期影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(8):1577-1584.

解文艳,樊贵盛,周怀平,等.秸秆还田方式对旱地玉米产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].农业机械学报,2011,42(11):60-67.

胡明芳,赵振勇,张科.周年秸秆还田量对南方双季稻生长及产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(4):1-6.

刘亚杰,胡振华,郑涨平,等.秸秆还田对滨海盐碱地稻田土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J].宁波农业科技,2019,6(17):24-27.

龚静静,胡宏祥,朱昌雄,等.秸秆还田对农田生态环境的影响综述[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(23):36-40.

韩瑞芸,陈哲,杨世琦.秸秆还田对土壤氮磷及水土的影响研究[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(9):148-154.

许立广.农作物秸秆还田对土壤养分和作物产量的影响研究初报[J].安徽农学通报,2016,22(2):63-64.

张久明,迟凤琴,宿庆瑞,等.不同有机物料还田对土壤结构与玉米光合速率的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2014,31(1):56-61.

王开峰.亚热带稻田土壤质量对长期施肥的响应研究[D].长沙:中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所,2007:41-44.

王庆杰,王宪良,李洪文,等.华北一年两熟区玉米秸秆覆盖对冬小麦生长的影响[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(8):192-198.

陈颖,赵磊,杨勇,等.海河流域水稻田氮磷地表径流流失特征初探[J].农业环境科学学报,2011,30(2):328-333.

焦平金,许迪,王少丽,等.自然降雨条件下农田地表产流及氮磷流失规律研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(3):534-540.

宋娅丽,王克勤,董莉,等.滇中烤烟坡耕地地表径流氮素的动态变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(4):7-11.

刘宗岸,杨京平,杨正超,等.苕溪流域茶园不同种植模式下地表径流氮磷流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):29-32,44.

郑海金,胡建民,黄鹏飞,等.红壤坡耕地地表径流与壤中流氮磷流失比较[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):41-45,70.

马琳琳,安娟,刘前进.横坡垄作壤中流条件下垄高对径流态氮磷流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):56-60.

邬燕虹,张丽萍,邓龙洲,等.坡面氮素流失的坡度和雨强效应模拟研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):27-33.

张子璐,刘峰,侯庭钰.我国稻田氮磷流失现状及影响因素研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(10):3292-3302.

潘忠成,袁溪,李敏.降雨强度和坡度对土壤氮素流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):9-13.

鲁耀,胡万里,雷宝坤,等.云南坡耕地红壤地表径流氮磷流失特征定位监测[J].农业环境科学学报,2012,31(8):1544-1553.

张华渝,王克勤,宋娅丽,等.滇中尖山河小流域不同土地利用类型土壤活性有机碳分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):16-21.

俞巧钢,叶静,马军伟,等.不同施氮水平下油菜地土壤氮素径流流失特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):22-25,30.

陈冬林,易镇邪,周文新,等.不同土壤耕作方式下秸秆还田量对晚稻土壤养分与微生物的影响[J].环境科学学报,2010,30(8):1722-1728.

赵亚丽,薛志伟,郭海斌,等.耕作方式与秸秆还田对土壤呼吸的影响及机理[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(19):155-165.

丛日环,张丽,鲁艳红,等.添加不同外源氮对长期秸秆还田土壤中氮素转化的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(7):1107-1114.

余坤,冯浩,王增丽,等.氨化秸秆还田改善土壤结构增加冬小麦产量[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(15):165-173.

王允青,王静,郭熙盛,等.不同水分条件下连续多年秸秆还田对水稻、油菜产量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(24):11464-11465.

夏颖,汪荣勇,高立,等.湖北省油菜-棉花轮作系统地表径流氮磷流失特征[J].湖北农业科学,2014,53(23):5751-5754.

王静,郭熙盛,王允青,等.巢湖流域不同耕作和施肥方式下农田养分径流流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(1):6-11.

王全九,赵光旭,刘艳丽,等.植被类型对黄土坡地产流产沙及氮磷流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):195-201.

王甜,黄志霖,曾立雄,等.三峡库区退耕还林土壤侵蚀及养分流失控制:以兰陵溪小流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(5):83-88.

Views

1326

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effects of Straw Returning and Planting Density on Nitrogen Absorption， Utilization， and Yield of Maize

Effect of Fertilization on Basic Physicochemical Properties of Saline-Alkali Soil in China

Effects of Straw Returning on Spatio-temporal Distribution of Water and Maize Yield Under Different Tillage Methods in Jinzhong

Effects of Straw Returning Instead of Fertilizer on Wheat Yield and Water and Fertilizer Utilization in Loess Dryland

Influence of Different Management Mode of Fertilization on Nitrogen Losses in Runoff from Nursery Land in a Catchment Area

Related Author

SUN Jialu

QI Zhijuan

LI Mo

SONG Fang

XU Jingwen

WANG Ziwen

LUO Xinbo

WANG Jinfeng

Related Institution

Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Agricultural Water Resources， Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs， Northeast Agricultural University

School of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering， Northeast Agricultural University

Life Sciences Department， Yuncheng University， Shanxi Technology Innovation Center of High Value-Added Echelon Utilization of Premium Agro-Products

DaFeng Seed Industry Co., Ltd.

School of Agronomy, Shanxi Agricultural University

⁰