HE Yunfeng, SHEN Haiou, ZHANG Yue, et al. Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Effects of Different Straw Returning Patterns in Sloping Farmland in the Chinese Black Soil Region[J]. 2020, 34(6): 89-94.
DOI:
HE Yunfeng, SHEN Haiou, ZHANG Yue, et al. Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Effects of Different Straw Returning Patterns in Sloping Farmland in the Chinese Black Soil Region[J]. 2020, 34(6): 89-94. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.014.
Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Effects of Different Straw Returning Patterns in Sloping Farmland in the Chinese Black Soil Region
The objective of this study was to reveal the soil and water conservation effects of different straw returning patterns at croplands in the black soil region of China. Based on simulated rainfall experiments at field croplands in situ
effects of three representative straw returning patterns (deep application of straw
smashed straw turnover
and no-tillage with straw mulching) on the processes of runoff rates and soil loss rates
total runoff and soil erosion amount
runoff and sediment reduction benefits at 50 and 100 mm/h rainfall intensities were analyzed. The traditional up- and down slope tillage was used as the control treatment. The results showed that: (1) The runoff rates for treatments of different straw returning patterns increased as the rainfall amount increased. Both the runoff rates and soil loss rates decreased in the order of up- and down slope tillage (CK) > deep application of straw > smashed straw turnover > no-tillage with straw mulching. (2) The straw returning treatments delayed the runoff yield time for 14.0 min at 50 mm/h and 4.8 min at 100 mm/h compared with the traditional up-and down slope tillage treatment
which could reflect the soil and water conservation effects of these straw returning measures. (3) The mean runoff reduction benefits for deep application of straw
smashed straw turnover
and no-tillage with straw mulching treatments were 36.8%
53.9%
and 65.8%
and their mean sediment reduction benefits were 84.9%
90.3%
and 96.8%
respectively. Therefore
the pattern of no-tillage with straw mulching had the best soil and water conservation effect in this study
which was followed in descending order by the patterns of smashed straw turnover and deep application of straw.
Nearing M A, Xie Y, Liu B Y, et al. Natural and anthropogenic rates of soil erosion[J].International Soil and Water Conservation Research,2017,5:77-84.
Cui M, Cai Q G, Zhu A X, et al. Soil erosion along a long slope in the gentle hilly areas of black soil region in Northeast China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2007,17(3):375-383.
Yao Q, Liu J J, Yu Z H, et al. Three years of biochar amendment alters soil physiochemical properties and fungal community composition in a black soil of northeast China[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,110:56-67.
Xu X Z, Xu Y, Chen S C, et al. Soil loss and conservation in the black soil region of Northeast China:A retrospective study[J].Environmental Science and Policy,2010,13(8):793-800.
车明轩,宫渊波,Muhammad N K,等.不同雨强、坡度对秸秆覆盖保持水土效果的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(2):131-135,142.
Parsons A J, Stone P M. Effects of intra-storm variations in rainfall intensity on interrill runoff and erosion[J].Catena,2006,67:68-78.
Jourgholami M, Abari M E. Effectiveness of sawdust and straw mulching on postharvest runoff and soil erosion of a skid trail in a mixed forest[J].Ecological Engineering,2017,109:15-24.