Hydrological and Ecological Characteristics of Typical Stand Litter Layer in the Loess Region of Western Shanxi Province

MA Xiaozhi; BI Huaxing; WANG Shanshan; CUI Yanhong; ZHAO Danyang; YUN Huiya; HOU Guirong

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.012

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Hydrological and Ecological Characteristics of Typical Stand Litter Layer in the Loess Region of Western Shanxi Province

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Hydrological and Ecological Characteristics of Typical Stand Litter Layer in the Loess Region of Western Shanxi Province
- Vol. 34, Issue 6, Pages: 77-83(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
  2. 山西吉县森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,北京,100083
  3. 水土保持国家林业局重点实验室(北京林业大学),北京,100083
  4. 北京市水土保持工程技术研究中心(北京林业大学),北京,100083
  5. 林业生态工程教育部工程研究中心(北京林业大学),北京,100083
  6. 北京林果业生态环境功能提升协同创新中心,北京,102206
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.012
  CLC： S715.7
- Published：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
MA Xiaozhi, BI Huaxing, WANG Shanshan, et al. Hydrological and Ecological Characteristics of Typical Stand Litter Layer in the Loess Region of Western Shanxi Province[J]. 2020, 34(6): 77-83.
DOI：

MA Xiaozhi, BI Huaxing, WANG Shanshan, et al. Hydrological and Ecological Characteristics of Typical Stand Litter Layer in the Loess Region of Western Shanxi Province[J]. 2020, 34(6): 77-83. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.012.

摘要

选择山杨栎类次生林（以下简称次生林）、刺槐林、侧柏林、油松林为研究对象，通过样地调查，结合室内浸泡方法，对比分析枯落物（未分解层、半分解层）的水文特征指标，研究典型林分枯落物层水文生态特性。结果表明：（1）枯落物厚度为3.93~4.95 cm，刺槐林最大，油松林最小；蓄积量为次生林最大（19.28 t/hm2），侧柏林（18.03 t/hm2）和刺槐林（17.57 t/hm2）次之，油松林最小（14.73 t/hm2），未分解层蓄积量小于半分解层。（2）枯落物最大持水量（率）为30.92~61.31 t/hm2（197%~320%），次生林最大，依次为刺槐林、侧柏林，最小为油松林。（3）枯落物有效拦蓄存在显著差异（P>0.05），表现为次生林（31.29 t/hm2） > 刺槐（22.20 t/hm2） > 侧柏（18.19 t/hm2） > 油松（13.94 t/hm2），有效拦蓄率为107%~173%。（4）在浸水2 h内，枯落物持水量和吸水速率变化以次生林与刺槐林最为迅速，半分解层较未分解层变化迅速；持水过程中，两者与时间分别呈对数函数（R2>0.89）和幂函数关系（R2>0.99）。在4种林地中，次生林林下枯落物水文生态潜力最优，油松纯林最差，表现为次生林 > 刺槐 > 侧柏 > 油松。刺槐是除次生林外的3种人工林中最优林种。建议研究区内合理优化恢复树种配置，以提高水文生态功能。

Abstract

In this paper

the secondary forests of Populus and Quercus (hereinafter referred to as secondary forests)

Robinia pseudoacacia forest

Platycladus orientalis forest

and Pinus tabulaeformis forest were selected as the research objects. Through sample survey and indoor immersion method

to compare and analyze the hydrological characteristics of litter (undecomposed layer

semi-decomposed layer)

and study the hydrological and ecological characteristics of litter layer in typical forest stands. The results showed that: (1) The thickness of litter is 3.93 to 4.95 cm. The largest was R. pseudoacacia forest

and the smallest was P. tabulaeformis forest.The largest volume was secondary forest (19.28 t/hm2)

followed by P. orientalis forest (18.03 t/hm2) and R. pseudoacacia forest (17.57 t/hm2)

the smallest was P. tabulaeformis forest (14.73 t/hm2).The accumulation of undecomposed layers was less than that of semi-decomposed layers. (2) The maximum water holding capacity (rate) of litter was 30.92 to 61.31 t/hm2 (197% to 320%)

the secondary forest was the largest

followed by R. pseudoacacia forest

P. orientalis forest

and the smallest was P. tabulaeformis forest. (3) There was a significant difference in effective storage of litters (P>0.05)

which was represented by secondary forest (31.29 t/hm2) > R. pseudoacacia (22.20 t/hm2) > P. orientalis (18.19 t/hm2) > P. tabulaeformis (13.94 t/hm2). The effective storage rate was 107% to 173%. (4) Within 2 hours of immersion

the water holding capacity and water absorption rate of litter in secondary forest and black locust forest changed most rapidly. The semi-decomposed layer changed faster than the undecomposed layer. In the process of holding water

the two had logarithmic function (R2>0.89) and power function relationship (R2 > 0.99) with time. Among the four types of forest land

the hydrological potential of litter in secondary forests was the best

and that of pure P. tabulaeformis forest was the worst. The potential of hydrological characteristics was secondary forest > R. pseudoacacia > P. orientalis > P. tabulaeformis. R. pseudoacacia was the best forest species among the three plantations except secondary forest. It is recommended to reasonably optimize the restoration of tree species allocation in the study area to improve hydrological and ecological functions.

关键词

Keywords

references

David P E, Joseph A T, Douglas S, et al. Maintaining ecosystem function and services in logged tropical forests[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2014,29(9):511-520.

侯贵荣,毕华兴,魏曦,等.黄土残塬沟壑区3种林地枯落物和土壤水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):357-363,371.

王忠禹,刘国彬,王兵,等.黄土丘陵区典型植物枯落物凋落动态及其持水性[J].生态学报,2019,39(7):2416-2425.

赵芳,李雪云,赖国桢,等.飞播马尾松林不同林下植被类型枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(4):26-33.

李民义,张建军,郭宝妮,等.晋西黄土区不同密度油松人工林林下植物多样性及水文效应[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(5):1083-1090.

王骄洋.冀北山区华北落叶松人工林林分主要因子与其水源涵养功能关系研究[D].河北保定:河北农业大学,2013.

Steven B V, Chelcy R Ford, James M V, et al. Future species composition will affect forest water use after loss of eastern hemlock from southern Appalachian forests[J].Ecological Applications,2013,23(4):777-790.

Zhang H C, Yuan W P, Dong W J, et al. Seasonal patterns of litter fall in forest ecosystem worldwide[J].Ecological Complexity,2014,20:240-247.

Wohl E, Barros A, Brunsell N, et al.The hydrology of the humid tropics[J].Nature Reports Climate Change,2012,2(9):655-662.

万春红,陶楚,杨小波,等.森林群落物种组成对凋落物组成的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(22):7435-7443.

侯贵荣,毕华兴,魏曦,等.黄土残塬沟壑区刺槐林枯落物水源涵养功能综合评价[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):251-257.

张雷燕,刘常富,王彦辉,等.宁夏六盘山南侧森林枯落物及土壤的水文生态功能研究[J].林业科学研究,2007,20(1):15-20.

张祎,李鹏,刘晓君,等.黄土丘陵区不同植被类型枯落物持水效能研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(5):100-105.

刘宇,张洪江,张友焱,等.晋西黄土丘陵区不同人工林枯落物持水特性研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(6):69-74.

张东,邵社刚,赵辉.晋西黄土丘陵沟壑区主要人工林枯落物水文特性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(5):97-101,110.

周娟,陈丽华,郭文体,等.大辽河流域水源涵养林枯落物持水特性研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(4):136-141.

鲁绍伟,高琛,李少宁,等.北京市松山不同海拔油松林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(1):1-6.

王忠禹,王兵,刘国彬,等.黄土丘陵区典型植被枯落物坡面分布及混入土壤对土壤性状的影响[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(11):2020-2031.

夏祥友.森林经营对东北林区主要森林类型蓄水保土功能的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2016.

周巧稚,毕华兴,孔凌霄,等.晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林枯落物层水文生态功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):115-121.

武鹏艳,张玉珍.3种人工林枯落物持水性能及土壤水文效应的研究[J].西南农业学报,2016,29(12):2930-2934.

白英辰,朱江,程小琴,等.密度调控对华北落叶松人工林枯落物水文特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):128-133.

庞梦丽,孙明阳,王明远,等.河北太行山典型水土保持经济林枯落物持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(6):200-204.

韩路,王海珍,吕瑞恒,等.塔里木河上游不同森林类型枯落物的持水特性[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):96-101.

常译方,毕华兴,许华森,等.晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林对土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):227-232.

赵陟峰,郭建斌,赵廷宁,等.土桥沟流域不同林分枯落物的水文特性[J].西北林学院学报,2008,23(6):14-17.

罗佳,田育新,周小玲,等.湘西北小流域不同植被类型枯落物层持水特性研究[J].湖南林业科技,2018,45(5):1-6.

陈莉莉,王得祥,张宋智,等.不同密度油松人工林土壤特性及水源涵养功能研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2013,41(7):141-149.

Views

1189

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Water Conservation Function of Litters and Soil in Three Kinds of Woodlands in Gully Region of Loess Plateau

Vegetation Growth Characteristics of Typical Plant Communities in Gully System in the Hilly and Gully Region of Loess Plateau

Effects on Soil Carbon Sink of Vegetation Succession in the Ziwuling Area

Hydrological Effects of Litter in Forest Parks Under Multi

Related Author

HOU Guirong1

BI Huaxing1

WEI Xi1

ZHOU Qiaozhi1

KONG Lingxiao1

Related Institution

College of Forestry, Central South University of Forestry and Technology

Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation, State Forestry Administration, Beijing Forestry University

State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology

Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Beijing Normal University

Beijing Forestry University,Key Lab of Soil and Water Conservation andDesertification Combation of Ministry of Education

⁰