Response of Soil Moisture to Rainfall in Sloping Farmland with Purple Soil in the Seasonal Arid Area

XU Lu; ZHANG Dan; XIANG Yuguo; CHEN Fan; CHEN Yulan; HUANG Tianfang

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.006

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Response of Soil Moisture to Rainfall in Sloping Farmland with Purple Soil in the Seasonal Arid Area

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Response of Soil Moisture to Rainfall in Sloping Farmland with Purple Soil in the Seasonal Arid Area
- Vol. 34, Issue 6, Pages: 37-45(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都,610041
  2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
  3. 四川省烟草公司凉山州公司, 四川西昌,615000
  4. 中国科学院成都生物研究所,成都,610041
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.006
  CLC： S152.7
- Published：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
XU Lu, ZHANG Dan, XIANG Yuguo, et al. Response of Soil Moisture to Rainfall in Sloping Farmland with Purple Soil in the Seasonal Arid Area[J]. 2020, 34(6): 37-45.
DOI：

XU Lu, ZHANG Dan, XIANG Yuguo, et al. Response of Soil Moisture to Rainfall in Sloping Farmland with Purple Soil in the Seasonal Arid Area[J]. 2020, 34(6): 37-45. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.006.

摘要

以金沙江下游季节性干旱区紫色土坡耕地为研究对象，使用PR2/6土壤剖面水分测定仪和翻斗式雨量计对雨季0—100 cm土层的土壤含水量和降雨量进行连续观测，分析雨季紫色土土壤水分对降雨的响应。结果表明：每月平均土壤含水量之间存在显著差异，0—20 cm土壤含水率表现为9月 > 8月≈7月 > 6月，在整个雨季呈累加上升趋势。降雨量大小是影响土壤水分补给深度的决定因素。小雨（6.4 mm）只对10 cm土层土壤水分产生影响，平均提高12.35%；中雨（23 mm）对30 cm以上土层土壤水分产生影响，10，20，30 cm分别提高21.16%，17.77%，8.22%；大雨（49 mm）和暴雨（112 mm）均可影响60 cm以上土层土壤水分，49 mm提高7.18%~31.12%，112 mm提高34.12%~49.18%。0—40 cm土壤含水量增加量与降雨量和降雨历时在0.01水平上显著相关；0—20 cm土层土壤含水量增加量与前期干旱天数在0.05水平上显著负相关；30—40 cm土层土壤含水量增加量与3天前期累积降雨量呈显著相关。紫色土超过70%的土壤水分存储在60，100 cm土层中，分别占土壤总储水量的15.82%和58.39%。不同土层土壤储水量对降雨的响应规律不同，雨季初期6月0—30 cm表层土壤储水量变化最大，此时60—100 cm深层土壤储水量较为稳定，而7—9月深层土壤储水量变化幅度大于表层土壤。

Abstract

Taking the purple soil sloping farmland in the seasonal arid area of the lower Jinsha river as the research object

the PR2/6 soil profile moisture analyzer and tipping rain gauge were used to continuously observe the soil moisture content of 0—100 cm soil layers and rainfall during the rainy season

and the purple soil moisture dynamics and its response to rainfall were analyzed. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the monthly average soil moisture content. The soil moisture content of 0—20 cm was as follows: September > August≈July > June

showing an increasing trend throughout the rainy season. The amount of rainfall was the major factor affecting the depth of water supply in soil. Light rain (6.4 mm) only affected soil moisture content above 10 cm

which increased 12.35%; moderate rain (23 mm) affected soil moisture content above 30 cm

and 10

and 30 cm increased by 21.16%

17.77% and 8.22% respectively; heavy rain (49 mm and 112 mm) affected soil moisture above 60 cm

49 mm increased by 7.18%~31.12%

112 mm increased by 34.12%~49.18%. The increased amount of soil moisture in 0—40 cm was significantly correlated with the amount of rainfall and rainfall duration at the level of 0.01; meanwhile

the increased amount of soil moisture in 0—20 cm soil layers was significantly negatively correlated with the drought interval at the level of 0.05; the increased amount of soil moisture in 30—40 cm was significantly correlated with the accumulated rainfall in the previous 3 days. More than 70% of the soil water of purple soil was stored in 60 cm and 100 cm soil layers

accounting for 15.82% and 58.39% of the total soil water storage

respectively. The respond of soil water storage in different soil layers to rainfall was different. The soil water storage of 0—30 cm changed the most in June

the soil water storage of 60—100 cm was relatively stable

while the soil water storage of 60—100 cm changed more than that of 0—30 cm from July to September.

关键词

Keywords

references

Yang L, Chen L D, Wei W, et al. Comparison of deep soil moisture in two re-vegetation watersheds in semi-arid regions[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,513(1):314-321.

何其华,何永华,包维楷.干旱半干旱区山地土壤水分动态变化[J].山地学报,2003,21(2):149-156.

Leitinger G, Tasser E, Newesely C, et al. Seasonal dynamics of surface runoff in mountain grassland ecosystems differing in land use[J].Journal of Hydrology,2010,385:95-104.

Tayfur G, Zucco G, Brocca L, et al. Coupling soil moisture and precipitation observations for predicting hourly runoff at small catchment scale[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,510:363-371.

孙媛,董晓华,郭梁锋,等.不同降雨条件下土壤水运动及再分布模拟研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2018,37(增刊2):74-80.

邓雄.农业非点源污染的研究进展、存在的问题及发展[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2007(增刊2):244-247.

Van Verseveld W J, Mcdonnell J J, Lajtha K, et al. A mechanistic assessment of nutrient flushing at the catchment scale[J].Journal of Hydrology,2008, 358(3):268-287.

赵荣玮,张建军,李玉婷,等.晋西黄土区人工林地土壤水分特征及其对降雨的响应[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):178-183.

李新乐,吴波,张建平,等.白刺沙包浅层土壤水分动态及其对不同降雨量的响应[J].生态学报,2019,39(15):5701-5708.

王思砚,苏维词,范新瑞,等.喀斯特石漠化地区土壤含水量变化影响因素分析:以贵州省普定县为例[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(3):171-175,180.

张川,陈洪松,聂云鹏,等.喀斯特地区洼地剖面土壤含水率的动态变化规律[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(10):1225-1232.

李馨欣,王小燕,蔡崇法,等.紫色土水分和壤中流对降雨强度的响应[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):25-31.

肖德安,王世杰.土壤水研究进展与方向评述[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(3):1182-1188.

中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤物理研究室.土壤物理性质测定法[M].北京:科学出版社,1978.

刘希林,张大林.崩岗土体剖面水分分布特征及变化规律:以广东五华县莲塘岗崩岗为例[J].热带地理,2015,35(3):291-297.

白盛元.黄土土柱降雨特征与土壤水分入渗过程研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2015.

邱野,王瑄.耕作模式对坡耕地土壤水分和大豆产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(22):128-137.

张瑜,黄明斌.黄土高原不同降雨年型乔、灌木蒸散特征与影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(6):207-212.

王正安,邸利,王彦辉,等.六盘山半干旱区华北落叶松林土壤水分对降雨的响应[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(4):144-151.

Ojha R, Morbidelli R, Saltalippi C, et al. Scaling of surface soil moisture over heterogeneous fields subjected to a single rainfall event[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,516:21-36.

He Z B, Zhao W Z, Liu H, et al. The response of soil moisture to rainfall event size in subalpine grassland and meadows in a semi-arid mountain range:A case study in northwestern China's Qilian Mountains[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,420/421:183-190.

徐冉,张圣微,朱仲元,等.放牧对典型草原区土壤水分及其对降雨响应规律的影响[J].中国草地学报,2019,41(3):59-66.

吴汉,熊东红,张宝军,等.金沙江干热河谷冲沟发育区不同部位土壤水分的时空变化特征[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(2):284-392.

黄艳丽,李占斌,苏辉,等.人工林对黄土高原小流域上下游不同坡面土壤水分的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):108-116.

吴巍,陈雨海,李全起,等.垄沟耕作条件下滴灌冬小麦田间土壤水分的动态变化[J].土壤学报,2006,43(6):1011-1017.

王帅兵,王克勤,宋娅丽,等.不同时间尺度反坡台阶红壤坡耕地土壤水分动态变化规律[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(8):195-205.

侯贵荣,余新晓,刘自强,等.不同降雨强度下北京山区典型林地土壤水分时空变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):209-215.

鲍彪,毕华兴,云雷,等.晋西黄土区刺槐林地土壤水分对降雨的响应[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,9(2):84-89.

Jia J B, Yu X X, Li Y T. Response of forestland soil water content to heavy rainfall on Beijing Mountain, northern China[J].Journal of Forestry Research,2016,27(3):541-550.

刘冰,赵文智,常学向,等.黑河流域荒漠区土壤水分对降水脉动响应[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(3):716-722.

Reynolds J F, Kemp P R, Ogle K, et al. Modifying the ‘pulse-reserve’ paradigm for deserts of North America:Precipitation pulses, soil water, and plant responses[J].Oecologia,2004,141(2):194-210.

Views

1350

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effects of Rainfall on Soil Water and Nitrogen Change Characteristics Under Different Land Uses

Influence of Stem Diameter of Hedgerow-Grass Ditch System on Sediment Particle Size and Nitrogen and Phosphorus Transport in Purple Soil Areas under Simulated Rainfall

Effects of Continuous Rainfall and Runoff under Different Slope Conditions on Hillslope Soil Erosion in the Black Soil Region

Influence of Grass Coverage, Rain Intensity and Slope on Sediment Concentration of Runoff on Loess Slope

Effects of

Related Author

YANG Cuiping

TUO Yunfei

ZHANG Dao

MA Jimin

WU Yaozhong

HE Yanzheng

LI Tianyang

LI Yonghao

Related Institution

Ecology and Environment Department in Southwest Forestry University

Water Resources Bureau, Jinning District

College of Resources and Environment， Southwest University

Key Laboratory of Ecological Environment in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education， School of Life Sciences， Southwest University

College of Resources and Environment， Jilin Agricultural University

⁰