Sensitivity of Soil Conservation Function to Land Use Change

WANG Yong; YANG Yankun; CHENG Xian; LI Weijie; GAO Min; WANG Jialu

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.004

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Sensitivity of Soil Conservation Function to Land Use Change

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Sensitivity of Soil Conservation Function to Land Use Change
- Vol. 34, Issue 6, Pages: 22-29(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西南大学地理科学学院,重庆,400715
  2. 三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室,重庆,400715
  3. 西南大学资源环境学院,重庆,400715
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.004
  CLC： S157
- Published：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
WANG Yong, YANG Yankun, CHENG Xian, et al. Sensitivity of Soil Conservation Function to Land Use Change[J]. 2020, 34(6): 22-29.
DOI：

WANG Yong, YANG Yankun, CHENG Xian, et al. Sensitivity of Soil Conservation Function to Land Use Change[J]. 2020, 34(6): 22-29. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.06.004.

摘要

土地利用/覆被变化作为人类活动的直观反映，深刻改变着地表植被覆盖和地表径流，进而导致土壤保持功能的变化。采用趋势分析法对重庆市2000—2015年土壤保持功能的变化趋势进行研究，采用交叉敏感系数法研究各地类转换对土壤保持功能的敏感性。结果表明：（1）研究区地类以林地和旱地为主，2000—2015年间林地、裸地、水体和建设用地的面积有所增加，旱地、草地和水田的面积有所减少。其中，建设用地增幅最大，达0.93%，主要来源于旱地和水田的转换；旱地降幅最大，达0.85%，主要流向建设用地和林地。（2）研究区2000—2015年间土壤保持量总体呈波动上升趋势。其中，基本不变的区域占比77.22%，增加和显著增加区域占比21.85%，减少和显著减少的区域占比0.10%。增加和显著增加的区域主要集中在500~1 000 m的旱地和林地，减少和显著减少的区域主要为海拔500 m以下的旱地。（3）旱地与草地、水田与林地之间的转换对土壤保持功能的变化敏感性最高（敏感性系数分别为11.01和6.73），其次是旱地与裸地、水田、水体之间，草地与水体、裸地、林地之间以及林地与水体、裸地之间的转换，其敏感性系数均大于1。

Abstract

As a direct reflection of human activities

land use cover deeply influences the surface vegetation and surface runoff

which leads to the change of soil conservation. Taking Chongqing as a case study

the soil conservation change trend was studied by the trend analysis method and the sensitivity of soil conservation to land use transition was analyzed by the cross-sensitivity coefficient method. The results showed that: (1) The land types in Chongqing were mainly forest land and dry land. From 2000 to 2015

the area of forest land

bare land

construction land

and water increased

while the area of dry land

grassland

and paddy field decreased. The construction land had the largest increase

mainly from dry land and paddy fields. The dry land had the largest decline

mainly converted into construction land and forest land. (2) From 2000 to 2015

the amount of soil conservation in Chongqing increased

but the growth trend was not linear. The soil conservation with extremely significant and significant increase accounted for 21.85% of the total increase area

respectively

while those with extremely significant and significant decrease were 0.10%

and the rest was not changed basically. The increased and significantly increased areas were mainly concentrated in the dry land and forest land with an altitude of 500~1 000 m

while the decrease and significant decrease areas were mainly in the dry land below 500 m above sea level. (3) The transitions of dry land to grassland and paddy fields to forest land were the most sensitive land conversion types with sensitivity coefficients of 11.01 and 6.73. The transitions of dry land to bare land

paddy fields

and water

forest land to water and bare land

and grassland to water

bare land

and forest land was sensitive

and their sensitivity coefficients were higher than 1.

关键词

Keywords

references

谢高地,肖玉,鲁春霞.生态系统服务研究:进展、局限和基本范式[J].植物生态学报,2006,30(2):191-199.

杜轶,郭青霞,郭汉清,等.汾河上游不同土地利用方式对坡地水土流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):44-51.

刘绿怡,刘慧敏,任嘉衍,等.生态系统服务形成机制研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(8):2731-2738.

闫胜军,郭青霞,闫瑞,等.不同土地利用类型下水土流失特征及雨强关系分析[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):45-49.

Zare M, Mohammady M, Pradhan B. Modeling the effect of land use and climate change scenarios on future soil loss rate in Kasilian watershed of northern Iran[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2017,76(8):305.

史志华,宋长青.土壤水蚀过程研究回顾[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):1-10.

饶恩明,肖燚.四川省生态系统土壤保持功能空间特征及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2018,38(24):8741-8749.

刘金巍,靳甜甜,刘国华,等.黑河中上游地区2000-2010年土地利用变化及水土保持服务功能[J].生态学报,2014,34(23):7013-7025.

李婷,刘康,马力阳,等.秦岭山地丹江流域土地利用变化的土壤侵蚀效应评价[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(4):583-595.

杨波,王全九,董莉丽.榆林市还林还草后土壤保持功能和经济价值评价[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(6):1313-1322.

Li W, MacBean N, Ciais P, et al. Gross and net land cover changes in the main plant functional types derived from the annual ESA CCI land covermaps (1992-2015)[J].Earth System Science Data,2018,10(1):119-234.

Yang Y K, Xiao P F, Feng X Z, et al. Accuracy assessment of seven global land cover datasets over China[J].Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,2017,125:156-173.

阮宏威,于静洁.1992-2015年中亚五国土地覆盖与蒸散发变化[J].地理学报,2019,74(7):1292-1304.

Angulo-Martinez M, Begueria S. Estimating rainfall erosivity from daily precipitation records:A comparison among methods using data from the Ebro Basin (NE Spain)[J].Journal of Hydrology,2009,379(1/2):111-121.

史东梅,江东,卢喜平,等.重庆涪陵区降雨侵蚀力时间分布特征[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(9):16-21.

Sharpley A N, Williams J R. EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator:1. Model documentation. US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No.1768. Temple, TX:US Department of Agriculture, 1990.

张雪峰,牛建明,张庆,等.内蒙古锡林河流域草地生态系统土壤保持功能及其空间分布[J].草业学报,2015,24(1):12-20.

Van Remortel R D, Hamilton M E, Hickey R J. Estimating the LS factor for RUSLE through iterative slope length processing of digital elevation data within Arclnfo Grid[J].Cartography,2001,30(1):27-35.

蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):19-24.

黄凯旋,刘扬,董晓健,等.基于土地利用变化的三峡库区(湖北段)土壤侵蚀消长研究[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):1-6,20.

朱林富,谢世友,杨华,等.基于MODIS EVI的重庆植被覆盖变化的地形效应[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(12):2023-2033.

张园,袁凤辉,王安志,等.2001—2018年长白山自然保护区生长季NDVI变化特征及其对气候变化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(4):1213-1222.

庄大方,刘纪远.中国土地利用程度的区域分异模型研究[J].自然资源学报,1997,12(2):10-16.

普拉提·莫合塔尔,海米提·依米提.土地利用变化下的生态系统服务敏感性研究:以克里雅绿洲为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(11):1849-1858.

刘永强,龙花楼,李加林.长江中游经济带土地利用转型及其生态服务功能交叉敏感性研究[J].地理研究,2018,37(5):1009-1022.

柳冬青,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统土壤保持功能时空变异及其影响因子[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):98-103.

方广玲,香宝,赵卫,等.基于GIS和RUSLE的拉萨河流域土壤侵蚀研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):6-12.

吴盛海.2016年重庆市水土保持公报[M].重庆:重庆市水利局,2016:2-3.

冉凤维,罗志军,吴佳平,等.鄱阳湖地区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系的时空格局[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(3):995-1004.

Views

1424

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Multi-Scenario Prediction of Land Use Changes and Soil Erosion in Three Gorges Reservoir Region Based on PLUS-InVEST Model

Effects of China′s Land Use Changes on Regional Climate Based on RegCM 4.7

Analysis of Temporal and Spatial Changes of Soil Moisture and Its Driving Forces on the Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains

Response of Ecological Profit and Loss to Land Use Change in the Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northeast China

Response of Soil Microbial Diversity, Community Structure, and Functional Potential to Primary Forest Conversion in Northwestern Hunan Province

Related Author

HU Xinyi

XIAO Zuolin

QIN Chuan

CHENG Xin

CHEN Jilong

JÜ Jialing

HU Manli

ZHAO Zilong

Related Institution

Chongqing River Affairs Center

Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology， Chinese Academy of Sciences

Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Sciences for Monitoring and Evaluation of Rural Land Utilization， School of History and Geography， Chengdu Normal University

Chongqing Key Laboratory of GIS Application， School of Geography and Tourism， Chongqing Normal University

Jiangsu Jiawang Resource Exhausted Mining Area Land Restoration and Ecological Succession， Ministry of Education Field Scientific Observation and Research Station

⁰