WANG Xingfu, HUANG Xianfei, HU Jiwei, et al. Relationship Among Soil Organic Carbon and Small Environment and Lithology in the Rocky Desertification Process in Different Karst Landforms[J]. 2020, 34(4): 295-303.
DOI:
WANG Xingfu, HUANG Xianfei, HU Jiwei, et al. Relationship Among Soil Organic Carbon and Small Environment and Lithology in the Rocky Desertification Process in Different Karst Landforms[J]. 2020, 34(4): 295-303. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.043.
Relationship Among Soil Organic Carbon and Small Environment and Lithology in the Rocky Desertification Process in Different Karst Landforms
In order to investigate the relationship among soil organic carbon and small environment and lithology in different karst landforms that the Karst plateau (KG)
Karts peak-cluster depression (KF)
Karst canyon (KX)
Karst virgin forests (KY) and Karst trough valley (KC) were taken from Puding
Xingyi
Guanling
Libo and Yinjiang in Guizhou province
respectively. The content of soil organic carbon in soil horizons (0-10
10-20
20-30 and 30-40 cm) and organic carbon in the critical surface between bottom soil layer and bedrock were was tested by the method of potassium dichromate
and then counting out the density and storage of Soil organic carbon
the spatial distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon in different karst landforms was analyzed. The results showed that the content
density and storage of soil organic carbon in different rocky desertification class were 113.18~163.98 g/kg
1.08~7.32 kg/m3 and 4.07~24.29 kg
respectively. The soil organic carbon is gradually reduce with the increasing of kasrt rocky desertification degree
and then the soil organic carbon concentration in stone trough is higher than other small environment types
and the content of soil organic carbon in the soil above on Limestone and Marl are more than other Lithology types as well. There is a large discrepancy of soil organic carbon among different karst landforms
in same ecology environment the soil organic carbon storage in KY and KC are more than other landform types. The soil organic carbon move along the evolution chain of Karst rocky desertification process
and the change of Small environment and Lithology in different karst landforms are play an important role in the spatial rebuild of soil organic carbon. The ecology environment of karst mountainous area is complex. If we want to get a more sensitive method to estimate the soil organic carbon in different karst landforms
further studies concerning soil organic carbon among different karst landforms were required.
关键词
Keywords
references
Eleanor H, Garry R W, Silvia F B, et al. Stability and storage of soil organic carbon in a heavy-textured karst soil from south-eastern Australia[J].Soil Research,2014,52(5):47-51.
Singh S K, Singh A K, Sharma B K, et al. Carbon stock and organic carbon dynamics in soils of rajasthan, india[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2007,68(3):408-421.
Yan J H, Zhou G Y, Zhang D Q, et al. Chang of water content, organic matter and exchangeable cation in soil along with a forest successional gradient in southern China[J].Pedosphere,2007,17(3):397-405.
Hansen E M, Christensen B T, Jensen L S, et al. Carbon sequestration in soil beneath long-term Miscanthus plantations as determined by
13
C abundance[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2004,26(2):97-105.
Scharlemann J P, Tanner E V, Hiederer R, et al. Global soil carbon:Understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool[J].Carbon Management,2014,5(1):81-91.
Schwendenmann L, Salmond J A, Weissert L F. Variability of soil organic carbon stocks and soil CO
2
efflux across urban land use and soil cover types[J].Geoderma,2016,271:80-90.
Akpa I C, Odeh O A, Bishop F A, et al. Total soil organic carbon and carbon sequestration potential in Nigeria[J].Geoderma,2016,271:202-215.
Taghizadeh-Toosi A, Olesen J E. Modeling soil organic carbon in Danish agricultural soils suggests low potential for future carbon sequestration[J].Agricultural Systems,2016,145:83-89.
Yuan D X. Carbon cycle in earth system and its effects on environment and resources[J].Quatern Science,2001,21(3):223-232.
Zhang Z M, Zhou Y C, Wang S J. Patterns and influencing factors of spatio-temporal variability of soil organic carbon in karst catchment[J].International Journal of Global Warming,2019,17(1):89-104.
Zhang Z M, Zhou Y C, Wang S J, et al. Change in SOC content in a small karst basin for the past 35 years and its influencing factors[J].Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science,2018,64(14):19-29.
Wang Y G, Li Y, Ye X H, et al. Profile storage of organic/inorganic carbon in soil:From forest to desert[J].Science of the Total Environment,2010,408(8):1925-1931.
Wang H, Gao J B, Hou W J. Quantitative attribution analysis of soil erosion in different geomorphological types in karst area:Based on the geodetector method[J].Journal of Geographical Sciencens,2019,29(2):271-286.
Xiao K C, Xu J M, Tang C X, et al. Differences in carbon and nitrogen mineralization in soils of differing initial pH induced by electro kinesis and receiving crop residue amendments[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2013,67:70-75.
Huang X F, Wang S J, Zhou Y C. Soil organic carbon change relating to the prevention and control of rocky desertification in Guizhou Province, SW China[J].International Journal of Global Warming,2018,15(3):315-332.