LIU Yang, WANG Quanjiu, GOU Lina, et al. Effect of Air-Permeable and Water-Proof Buried Body on Soil Water Infiltration and Solute Transport[J]. 2020, 34(4): 152-157.
DOI:
LIU Yang, WANG Quanjiu, GOU Lina, et al. Effect of Air-Permeable and Water-Proof Buried Body on Soil Water Infiltration and Solute Transport[J]. 2020, 34(4): 152-157. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.023.
Effect of Air-Permeable and Water-Proof Buried Body on Soil Water Infiltration and Solute Transport
In order to analyze the effect of air-permeable and water-proof soil on water infiltration and solute transport
an one-dimensional vertical soil column infiltration test was carried out with different bulk densities (1.40
1.45
1.50
1.60 g/cm3). The results showed that the air-permeable and water-proof (weak permeable) buried body could increase the cumulative infiltration of soil and promote the migration of wetting front. In a certain range
with the increases of the bulk densities of the air-permeable and water-proof (weak permeable) buried body
both the infiltration rate and the migration rate of wetting front increased. When the infiltration time was 600 min
the cumulative infiltration of soil increased by 7.42%~29.17%
and the depth of wetting front reached 27 cm. The infiltration time decreased by 26.97%~64.27% correspondingly. Compared with the control group
the amount of solute migration to the deep soil was reduced by different bulk densities of the air-permeable and water-proof (weak permeable) buried body. Both Philip model and algebraic model could describe the infiltration process of soil water in the air-permeable and water-proof (weak permeable) buried body
and the permeability s in Philip model and the comprehensive shape coefficient α in the algebraic model were positively correlated with the volume weight ratio and the volume weight ratio inside and outside the air-permeable and water-proof (weak permeable) buried body. The results showed that the air-permeable and water-proof (weak permeable) buried body could improve the water infiltration capacity and solute transport by changing the suction distribution of the upper soil
and realize the regulation and purification of urban rainwater runoff.
Hsieh C, Davis A P. Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban storm water runoff[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering,2005,131(11):1521-1531.
National Research Council. Urban stormwater management in the United States[M]. USA:National Academies Press,2009.
Liaw C H, Tsai Y L, Cheng M S. Hydrologic analysis of distributed small-scale stormwater control systems[J].Journal of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering,2005,23(1):1-12.
Brown R A, Hunt Ⅲ W F. Impacts of media depth on effluent water quality and hydrologic performance of undersized bioretention cells[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2010,137(3):132-143.
Scholz M, Xu J. Performance comparison of experimental constructed wetlands with different filter media and macrophytes treating industrial wastewater contaminated with lead and copper[J].Bioresource Technology,2002,83(2):71-79.
Knight R L, Kadlec R H, Ohlendorf H M. The use of treatment wetlands for petroleum industry effluents[J].Environmental Science and Technology,1999,33(7):973-980.