

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 萍乡学院材料与化学工程学院,江西,萍乡,337055
2. 江西环境工程职业学院林业学院,江西,赣州,341002
Published:2020
移动端阅览
LI Yi, SONG Dunfu, WANG Zongli, et al. Research on Water Storage of Litter and Soil Layer in the Rare Earth Ore Mining Site in Southern Jiangxi[J]. 2020, 34(2): 153-158.
LI Yi, SONG Dunfu, WANG Zongli, et al. Research on Water Storage of Litter and Soil Layer in the Rare Earth Ore Mining Site in Southern Jiangxi[J]. 2020, 34(2): 153-158. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.022.
为探究赣南废弃稀土矿区土壤水源涵养功能,对其采矿迹地枯落物层和土壤层贮水功能采用环刀法进行研究。结果表明,不同采矿迹地0—30 cm土层土壤含水量平均值表现为天然林地(180.37 g/kg) > 堆积地(170.67 g/kg) > 挖矿地(86.36 g/kg);土壤容重平均值表现为堆积地(1.54 g/cm3) > 挖矿地(1.31 g/cm3) > 天然林地(1.20 g/cm3);土壤毛管孔隙度平均值表现为天然林地(44.08%) > 堆积地(37.89%) > 挖矿地(35.82%);土壤毛管蓄水量平均值表现为天然林地(440.77 t/hm2) > 堆积地(378.94 t/hm2) > 挖矿地(358.20 t/hm2)。土壤最大蓄水量的表现与土壤毛管蓄水量相似。不同采矿迹地涵养水源能力天然林地最强,其单位面积蓄水量为(561.34±44.32) t/hm2,挖矿地最差,其值为(431.65±53.66) t/hm2。由此可见,天然林地土壤水源涵养功能强于各采矿迹地,稀土矿区采矿作业对枯落物层和土壤层贮水功能影响较大。
In order to explore the soil water conservation function of abandoned rare earth mining area in southern Jiangxi
the water storage function of litter and soil layer of the mining site were studied through the ring knife method. The results showed that the average soil water content of 0-30 cm soil layer in different mining sites followed the order of natural forest land (180.37 g/kg) > stacked ground (170.67 g/kg) > mining land (86.36 g/kg). The average value of soil bulk density followed the order of stacked ground (1.54 g/cm3) > mining land (1.31 g/cm3) > natural forest land (1.20 g/cm3). The average value of soil capillary porosity followed the order of natural forest land (44.08%) > stacked ground (37.89%) > mining land (35.82%). The average value of soil capillary storage followed the order of natural forest land (440.77 t/hm2) > stacked ground (378.94 t/hm2) > mining land (358.20 t/hm2). The trend of soil maximum water storage was similar to that of soil capillary storage. The natural forest land had the strongest water conservation capacity among the different mining sites
and the water storage capacity per unit area was (561.34±44.32) t/hm2
and that in the mining area was the worst with the value of (431.65±53.66) t/hm2. The water conservation of natural forest land was stronger than that of other mining sites
and the mining operations in the rare earth mining area had a great influence on the water storage of litter and soil layer.
刘培娟,杨吉华,李申安.三里庄水库上游水源涵养林不同林分枯落物水容量研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(1):239-245.
周传艳,周国逸,闫俊华,等.鼎湖山地带性植被及其不同演替阶段水文学过程长期对比研究[J].植物生态学报,2005,29(2):208-217.
刘世荣,温远光,王兵,等.中国森林生态系统水文生态规律[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1996:335.
杨海龙,朱金兆,毕利东.三峡库区森林流域生态系统土壤渗透性能的研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):63-65.
梁惕平,陈韬.赣南某稀土矿矿山恢复治理措施[J].中国科技博览,2013(27):555.
邹国良,陈富生.赣南矿产资源综合开发与利用研究[J].采矿技术,2006(4):13-15.
王勤,张宗应,徐小牛.安徽大别山库区不同林分类型的土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):59-62.
张万儒,许本彤.森林土壤定位研究方法[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1986.
孙艳红,张洪江,程金花,等.缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):106-109.
王贵霞,李传荣,许景伟,等.沙质海岸5种植被类型土壤物理性状及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2):142-146.
李淑春.冀北山地华北落叶松、桦木林土壤水分物理性质研究[J].河北林果研究,2017,32(1):142-146.
林佳慧,曾曙才.不同林分类型土壤水分及物理性质对比研究[D].武汉:华南农业大学,2016.
李奕,满秀玲,蔡体久,等.大兴安岭山地樟子松天然林土壤水分物理性质及水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(2):87-96.
赵磊,王兵,蔡体久,等.江西大岗山不同密度杉木林枯落物持水和土壤贮水能力研究[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):203-208.
刘西刚,王勇辉,焦黎.夏尔希里自然保护区典型植被土壤水源涵养功能探究[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):121-128.
王勇,杨瑞,瞿爽,等.楠杆自然保护区不同植被类型土壤物理特性及涵养水源功能分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):183-188.
马国飞,满苏尔·沙比提,张雪琪.托木尔峰国家级自然保护区台兰河上游不同海拔草地土壤持水能力研究[J].草地学报,2017,25(5):966-972.
陈琦,刘苑秋,刘士余,等.杉木取代阔叶林后林下水源涵养功能差异评价[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):244-250.
刘顺,盛可银,刘喜帅,等.赣南毛竹林土壤的渗透性特征[J].安徽农业大学学报,2018,45(2):252-257.
张引,黄永梅,周长亮,等.冀北山地5个海拔梯度油松林枯落物与土壤水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):126-131.
杨侨,赵龙,侯红,等.土壤改良剂对赣南废弃稀土尾矿的改良效应[J].应用化工,2018,47(2):211-214.
周彩云.赣南离子型稀土矿区损毁土壤不同改良剂应用效应研究[D].南昌:江西农业大学,2018.
0
Views
896
下载量
3
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621