Comparative Study of Sediment Particle Transport on Slopes of Two Disturbed Soil Engineering Accumulations

CHEN Zhuo; GAO Zhaoliang; LI Yonghong; NIU Yaobin; ZHAO Jing; ZHANG Heng and SU Yuan

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.005

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparative Study of Sediment Particle Transport on Slopes of Two Disturbed Soil Engineering Accumulations

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Comparative Study of Sediment Particle Transport on Slopes of Two Disturbed Soil Engineering Accumulations
- Vol. 34, Issue 1, Pages: 34-40(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  3. 生态环境部环境工程评估中心,北京,100012
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.005
  CLC： S157.1
- Published：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
CHEN Zhuo, GAO Zhaoliang, LI Yonghong, et al. Comparative Study of Sediment Particle Transport on Slopes of Two Disturbed Soil Engineering Accumulations[J]. 2020, 34(1): 34-40.
DOI：

CHEN Zhuo, GAO Zhaoliang, LI Yonghong, et al. Comparative Study of Sediment Particle Transport on Slopes of Two Disturbed Soil Engineering Accumulations[J]. 2020, 34(1): 34-40. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.005.

摘要

为探究不同土壤类型对工程堆积体坡面侵蚀泥沙搬运的影响，选取构筑堆积体的2种扰动土壤，设定4个放水梯度（8，12，16，20 L/min）在32°条件下进行野外冲刷试验。结果表明：2种坡面产流产沙率均随冲刷延时呈"多峰多谷"变化；较扰动风沙土堆积体，扰动红壤堆积体产流产沙率均随流量增加上升速率较缓；流量20 L/min时，重力在扰动风沙土堆积体坡面侵蚀中发挥主导作用；各放水梯度下2种堆积体坡面累积产沙量与累积径流量均呈极显著线性关系（P<0.01，R2>0.99）；随流量增大，搬运泥沙颗粒组成均接近原状土，扰动风沙土坡面径流搬运泥沙颗粒以砂粒为主（> 60%），扰动红壤坡面径流搬运泥沙颗粒各组分比例相对均匀（各组分含量为24%~41%）。该研究结果可为不同土壤类型堆积体坡面水土流失防控措施科学配置提供理论依据。

Abstract

In order to study the effects of different soils on sediments particle transport on slopes of engineering accumulation

a field scouring experiment was carried out under two kinds of disturbed soil

red and aeolian sandy soil

four flow gradients 8

16 and 20 L/min

and under the condition of 32°. The results showed that:(1) The runoff and sediment yield of the two accumulation slopes showed a "multi-peak and multi-valley" change process with time. (2) Compared with the disturbed aeolian sandy soil accumulation

the rate of sediment yield on the slope of disturbed red soil accumulation increased slowly with the increasing discharge flow rates. When the discharge flow rate was 20 L/min

the gravity factor played a leading role in the slope erosion of aeolian sandy soil accumulation. (3) The cumulative sediment yield of the two engineering accumulations was significantly correlated with the cumulative runoff

which could be described by linear function (P<0.01

R2>0.99). (4) With the increase of discharge rates

the proportion of sediment particles transported on the slope of the accumulation was close to the original soil. The main erosion sediment particles of the aeolian sandy soil were sand grains (> 60%)

the proportion of transportation of red soil particles was relatively uniform(the sediment transport contents ranged from 24% to 41% for each particle size). The difference in slope erosion of different accumulations was closely related to soil texture. These results could provide theoretical basis for the prevention and control measures for soil erosion on slopes of different soil types.

关键词

Keywords

references

李建明,牛俊,王文龙,等.不同土质工程堆积体径流产沙差异[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):187-194.

戎玉博,骆汉,谢永生,等.雨强对工程堆积体侵蚀规律和细沟发育的影响[J].泥沙研究,2016(6):12-18.

张振超,张琳琳,王冬梅,等.生产建设项目表土保护与利用[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(1):127-132.

杨帅.不同工程堆积体坡面水蚀过程及泥沙颗粒搬运机制研究[D].陕西杨凌:中国科学院研究生院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心,2018.

汪亚峰,李茂松,卢玉东等.试论退耕还林中对坡度标准的界定[J].水土保持科技情报,2004(6):25-27.

孙丽丽,査轩,黄少燕,等.不同降雨强度对紫色土坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):18-23.

王凯,王玉杰,王彬,等.黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(9):2114-2121.

李桂芳.典型黑土区坡面土壤侵蚀影响因素与动力学机理研究[D].陕西杨凌:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2016.

Walker P H, Kinnell P I A, Green P. Transport of a noncohesive sandy mixture in rainfall and runoff experiments[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1978,42(5):793-801.

胡传旺,王辉,刘常,等.南方典型土壤水力特征差异性分析[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):97-102.

李超.土壤根系含量对风蚀影响的风洞模拟研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2016.

王文龙,李占斌,李鹏,等.神府东胜煤田开发建设弃土弃渣冲刷试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(5):68-71.

赵暄,谢永生,景民晓,等.生产建设项目弃土堆置体下垫面仿真模拟标准化参数[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(5):229-234.

卞艳丽,曹惠提,张会敏,等.泥沙级配对浑水灌溉下土壤水分增长过程的影响分析[J].节水灌溉,2016(7):23-30,35.

罗榕婷,张光辉,沈瑞昌,等.染色法测量坡面流流速的最佳测流区长度研[J].水文,2010,30(3):5-9.

吴凤至.坡面侵蚀过程中泥沙颗粒特性研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2012.

Michael C S, Timothy P B. Particle size characteristics of suspended sediment in hillslope runoff and stream flow[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1997,22(8):705-719.

王玲.陡坡地水蚀过程与泥沙搬运机制[D].陕西杨凌:中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心,2016.

Martínez-Mena M, Castillo V, Albaladejo J, et al. Relations between interrill erosion processes and sediment particle size distribution in a semiarid Mediterranean area of SE of Spain[J]. Geomorphology, 2002,45(3):261-275.

Asadi H, Moussavi A, Ghadiri H, et al. Flow-driven soil erosion processes and the size selectivity of sediment[J]. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam),2011,406(1/2):73-81.

王剑.降雨驱动下侵蚀泥沙颗粒分选特征及搬运机制[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2015.

李德利,王瑄,邱野.天然降雨条件下裸坡、植被坡的产流产沙过程分析[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(35):21971-21974.

陈秀玲,李志忠,靳建辉,等.中国南方第四纪红土研究进展[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版),2009,25(5):118-124.

韩鹏,倪晋仁,王兴奎.黄土坡面细沟发育过程中的重力侵蚀实验研究[J].水利学报,2003(1):51-56,61.

张乐涛,高照良,李永红,等.模拟径流条件下工程堆积体陡坡土壤侵蚀过程[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(8):145-153.

Young R A. Characteristics of eroded sediment[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1980,23(5):1139-1142,1146.

吴发启,张洪江.土壤侵蚀学[M].北京:科学出版社,2012:209-239.

赵红梅.采矿塌陷条件下包气带土壤水分布与动态变化特征研究[D].北京:中国地质科学院,2006.

丁文斌,李叶鑫,史东梅,等.2种工程堆积体边坡模拟径流侵蚀对比研究[J].土壤学报,2017,54(3):558-569.

Views

1191

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Influence and Mechanisms of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Detachment Capacity in Red Soil Hilly Regions

Response of Erosion Processes and Hydrodynamic Indicators to Inflow Patterns on Engineering Accumulation Slopes

Effects of Coal Gangue and Microbial Inoculant Co-Amendment on Physicochemical Properties of Aeolian Sandy Soil and Alfalfa Growth

Small Watershed Erosion Model （SWEM）

Response of Soil Total Nitrogen Distribution to Erosion under Ecological Restoration in Qinling Water Source Area

Related Author

WU Jieling

ZHOU Qin

LIN Qiang

ZHOU Shiqi

XI Jie

HUANG Shaoyan

ZHA Xuan

CHEN Yueyan

Related Institution

School of Geographical Sciences， Fujian Normal University

Fujian Experimental Station of Soil and Water Conservation

Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Eco-Geographical Process of Ministry-of Education

College of Resources and Environment， Shanxi Agricultural University， Taigu

Soil Health Laboratory in Shanxi Province

⁰