Hydrologic Effects of Different Forest Types Shelterbelt Litter in Yudaokou Ranch

HAO Wanwan; ZHAO Peng; LI Siwei; GU Jiancai

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.028

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Hydrologic Effects of Different Forest Types Shelterbelt Litter in Yudaokou Ranch

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Hydrologic Effects of Different Forest Types Shelterbelt Litter in Yudaokou Ranch
- Vol. 33, Issue 6, Pages: 197-204(2019)
- 作者机构：
  
  河北农业大学林学院,河北,保定,071000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.028
  CLC：
- Published：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
HAO Wanwan, ZHAO Peng, LI Siwei, et al. Hydrologic Effects of Different Forest Types Shelterbelt Litter in Yudaokou Ranch[J]. 2019, 33(6): 197-204.
DOI：

HAO Wanwan, ZHAO Peng, LI Siwei, et al. Hydrologic Effects of Different Forest Types Shelterbelt Litter in Yudaokou Ranch[J]. 2019, 33(6): 197-204. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.028.

摘要

以承德市围场县御道口牧场4种不同类型（落叶松、樟子松、落叶松和樟子松混交林、樟子松和榆树混交林）防护林为研究对象，采用样地调查和室内浸泡法，对其枯落物的水文效应进行研究。结果表明：各种类型防护林的枯落物蓄积量的范围为5.42~24.59 t/hm2，其中落叶松蓄积量最大，为24.59 t/hm2，樟子松和榆树混交林蓄积量最小，为5.42 t/hm2，且4种林分类型的半分解层蓄积量均大于未分解层；平均最大持水量规律为落叶松（16.61 t/hm2） > 樟子松和落叶松混交林（14.80 t/hm2） > 樟子松（10.22 t/hm2） > 樟子松和榆树混交林（9.99 t/hm2）；平均最大持水率大小依次为落叶松（427.02%） > 樟子松和榆树混交林（396.30%） > 樟子松和落叶松混交林（360.88%） > 樟子松（303.13%）；有效拦蓄量规律为樟子松和落叶松混交林（74.65 t/hm2） > 落叶松（71.21 t/hm2） > 樟子松（48.82 t/hm2） > 樟子松和榆树混交林（17.66 t/hm2）；有效拦蓄率规律为落叶松（344.99%） > 樟子松和榆树混交林（326.66%） > 樟子松和落叶松混交林（286.27%） > 樟子松（215.49%）。综合结果表明落叶松的枯落物层持水能力最好，该地区落叶松防护林的枯落物层涵养水源功能优于其他类型的林分。

Abstract

In this paper

four different forest stands (larch pine forest

camphor pine forest

mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine

and mixed forest of camphor pine and elm) of yudaokou pasture in weichang County

Chengde city were chosen as objects and their hydrologic effect of litter was studied by sample survey and indoor soaking method. The results showed that the amount of litter in various forest stands was 5.42~24.59 t/hm2

of which larch pine forest had the largest amount

24.59 t/hm2

and the amount of mixed forests of camphor pine and elm was the smallest

5.42 t/hm2. The contents of the semi-partition layer of the four stands of forest were all larger than the undecomposed layer. The average maximum water holding capacity was larch pine forest (16.61 t/hm2) > mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine (14.80 t/hm2) > camphor pine forest (10.22 t/hm2) > mixed forest of camphor pine and elm (9.99 t/hm2). The average maximum water holding rate was larch pine forest (427.02%) > mixed forest of camphor pine and elm (396.30%) > mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine (360.88%) > camphor pine forest (303.13%). The effective retaining content was mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine (74.65 t/hm2) > larch pine forest (71.21 t/hm2) > camphor pine forest (48.82 t/hm2) > mixed forest of camphor pine and elm (17.66 t/hm2). The effective retaining rate was larch pine forest (344.99%) > mixed forest of camphor pine and elm (326.66%) > mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine (286.27%) > camphor pine forest (215.49%). The comprehensive results showed that larch pine forest has the best water holding capacity in litter layer

and the function of retaining water in litter layer of larch shelter forest in this area is better than other types of forest stand.

关键词

Keywords

references

杜金鸿,刘方正,周越,等.自然保护地生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].环境科学研究,2019,32(9):1475-1482.

曹恒.青海高寒区不同人工林地土壤和枯落物的水文功能研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2014.

张更权.大通县退耕还白桦林枯枝落物和土壤持水效应[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(31):107-110.

景贯阳.陇东黄土高原人工刺槐林枯落物层和土壤层生态水文功能研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2017.

常红娟,张治昊.华北地区不同林分类型枯落物层持水性能研究[J].河北林业科技,2016(5):25-28.

刘斌,鲁绍伟,李少宁,等.北京西山6种天然纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):73-78.

彭云莲,金兆梁,吕刚,等.浑河源头水源涵养林枯落物持水能力研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2018,49(5):613-620.

敖特根其木格,秦富仓,周佳宁,等.内蒙古自治区多伦县不同林地枯落物持水性能研究[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(4):114-118.

邢晓光,沈会涛,马文才,等.冀西北山地华北落叶松和白桦林下枯落物水文特征[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):126-130.

郭宇嘉,牛庆花,陆贵巧,等.承德市第三乡林场不同林分类型枯落物和土壤的持水特性[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(3):38-44.

柳晓娜,贾国栋,余新晓.不同密度杨树人工林的林地涵养水源功能研究[J].环境科学与技术,2017,40(10):8-13.

杨龙.梵净山黔稠林的结构与动态[J].植物生态学与地植物学丛刊,1983(3):204-214.

饶良懿,朱金兆,毕华兴.重庆四面山森林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,27(1):33-37.

宣立辉,佟彦国,张军,等.冀北山区油松人工林林分密度对枯落物层和土壤层水文特征的影响[J].林业与生态科学,2019,34(1):15-23.

宣立辉,康凡,谷建才,等.冀北地区典型林分枯落物层与土壤层的水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):86-91.

周福成.塞罕坝3种林分类型枯落物持水特性研究[J].林业与生态科学,2018,33(4):381-386.

徐洪亮,满秀玲,盛后财.大兴安岭不同类型落叶松天然林水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):92-96.

刘艳,孙向阳,范俊岗,等.辽宁省森林枯落物现存量及其持水性能[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2017,25(4):689-699.

何斌,黄承标,秦武明,等.不同植被恢复类型对土壤性质和水源涵养功能的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(2):71-74.

马正锐,程积民,班松涛,等.宁夏森林枯落物储量与持水性能分析[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):199-203.

肖洋,满秀玲,范金凤.公别拉河流域主要森林类型的土壤肥力与涵养水源功能[J].东北林业大学学报,2006,34(1):28-30.

杨良辰,张楠.沿坝地区3种混交林枯落物层与土壤层水源涵养能力[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):253-258.

孙立博,余新晓,陈丽华,等.坝上高原杨树人工林的枯落物及土壤水源涵养功能退化[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):104-110.

Views

1444

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Hydrological Effects of Litter in Different Forest Types in the Typical Areas of Taihang Mountains

Vegetation Growth Characteristics of Typical Plant Communities in Gully System in the Hilly and Gully Region of Loess Plateau

Effects on Soil Carbon Sink of Vegetation Succession in the Ziwuling Area

Hydrological Effects of Litter in Forest Parks Under Multi

Related Author

ZHAO Peng

MA Jiaming

LI Yanru

MA Ziqi

GU Jiancai

HUANG Dongmei

SU Xufei

ZHANG Guanghui

Related Institution

College of Science, Hebei Agricultural University

State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology

Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Beijing Normal University

Beijing Forestry University,Key Lab of Soil and Water Conservation andDesertification Combation of Ministry of Education

北京林业大学水土保持与荒漠化防治教育部重点实验室

⁰