Effects of Surface Relief on Runoff and Sediment Yield Under Simulated Rainfall Experiments

LI Hemou; LIANG Xinlan; ZHAO Xiaodong; JIN Hongjie; WU Rongwen; CHEN Yuxi

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.014

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effects of Surface Relief on Runoff and Sediment Yield Under Simulated Rainfall Experiments

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Effects of Surface Relief on Runoff and Sediment Yield Under Simulated Rainfall Experiments
- Vol. 33, Issue 6, Pages: 99-104(2019)
- 作者机构：
  
  四川农业大学水利水电学院,四川,雅安,625014
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.014
  CLC：
- Published：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
LI Hemou, LIANG Xinlan, ZHAO Xiaodong, et al. Effects of Surface Relief on Runoff and Sediment Yield Under Simulated Rainfall Experiments[J]. 2019, 33(6): 99-104.
DOI：

LI Hemou, LIANG Xinlan, ZHAO Xiaodong, et al. Effects of Surface Relief on Runoff and Sediment Yield Under Simulated Rainfall Experiments[J]. 2019, 33(6): 99-104. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.014.

摘要

揭示地表起伏形态对产流和产沙的影响及作用机理，为蓄水保土、调节径流和控制径流提供参考依据。通过野外人工模拟降雨试验，在3种降雨强度（60，90，120 mm/h）下，分析了5种起伏的地表（单凸起、单凹陷、凹凸相间、凹凸相连、光滑）坡面的产流产沙情况。结果表明：（1）在3种雨强下，5种地形的初始产流时间表现为：光滑地表 < 单凸起地表 < 单凹陷地表 < 凹凸相间地表 < 凹凸相连地表，且产流越早的地表其产流量和径流系数也越高；（2）在3种雨强下，5种地表的次降雨产沙量和产沙强度由小到大依次为：凹凸相连地表 < 凹凸相间地表 < 单凹陷地表 < 光滑地表 < 单凸起地表，产沙强度越大的地表其产沙过程越不稳定；（3）与光滑地表相比，地表凸起会加剧土壤流失，地表凹陷会减轻土壤流失，且凸起和凹陷组合的地表其减轻土壤流失的效应更显著；（4）降雨强度的增大会削弱不同地表起伏对产流产沙的影响。研究结论为地表起伏类型对坡面产流产沙有重要影响，光滑地表最易产生径流，凸起地表土壤流失最严重，凹凸相连地表蓄水保土效益最好。

Abstract

In order to study the effects of different surface relief forms on runoff and sediment yield during slope erosion process

five kinds of surface relief treatments (mounds

depressions

Intervals mound and depression

continuous mound and depression

smooth) were set up. The runoff and sediment yield of each treatment under three rainfall intensities (60 mm/h

90 mm/h

120 mm/h) by field artificial rainfall experiments were analyzed. The results showed that:(1) Under three rain intensities

the initial runoff time of the smooth surface was the shortest

while the continuous mound and depression surface was the longest. The initial runoff time of intervals mound and depression surface was close to continuous mound and depression surface

while mounds surface was just a little longer than the smooth one. The runoff time of depression surface was in the middle. The shorter the initial runoff time was

the bigger the runoff volume and runoff coefficient were. (2) Under the same rain intensity

the sediment volume and sediment yield intensity of different treatments ranked as:continuous mound and depression surface < intervals mound and depression surface < depressions surface < smooth surface < the mound surface. The greater the sediment yield intensity was

the more unstable the sediment yield process was. (3) Compared to the smooth surface

the mound aggravated soil loss

while the depression reduced soil loss. When mounds and depressions were combined

the reduction of soil loss was more significant. (4) Increasing rainfall intensities weakened the effect of different surface reliefs on runoff and sediment yield. The conclusion was that the different types of surface relief affected the runoff and sediment yield significantly. Runoff occurred most easily on smooth surface

and soil loss was most serious on mound surface

as well as the conservation of soil and water was best on continuous mound and depression surface.

关键词

Keywords

references

Zheng Z C, He S Q, Wu F Q. Changes of soil surface roughness under water erosion process[J].Hydrological Processes, 2014,28(12):3919-3929.

张青峰,王健,赵龙山,等.基于M-DEM黄土人工锄耕坡面微地形特征研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(9):149-153.

郑子成,秦凤,李廷轩.不同坡度下紫色土地表微地形变化及其对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(8):168-175.

Morbidelli R, Saltalippi C, Flammini A, et al. Infiltration on sloping surfaces:Laboratory experimental evidence and implications for infiltration modeling[J].Journal of Hydrology,2015,523:79-85.

Rai R K, Upadhyay A, Singh V P. Effect of variable roughness on runoff[J].Journal of Hydrology,2010,382(1):115-127.

Vermang J, Marco A, Da S, et al. Characterization of soil surface roughness effects on runoff and soil erosion rates under simulated rainfall[J].Soilence Society of America Journal,2010,79(3):903-916.

罗键,尹忠,郑子成,等.不同降雨条件下紫色土横垄坡面地表微地形变化特征[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(16):3162-3173.

梁心蓝.水蚀过程中地表糙度变化及侵蚀响应[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2015.

Fox D M, Le Bissonnais Y, Quétin P. The implications of spatial variability in surface seal hydraulic resistance for infiltration in a mound and depression microtopography[J].Catena,1998,32(2):101-114.

Zhao L S, Huang C H, Wu F Q. Effect of microrelief on water erosion and their changes during rainfall[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2016,41(5):579-586.

Fox D M, Le Bissonnais Y, Bruand A. The effect of ponding depth on infiltration in a crusted surface depression[J].Catena,1998,32(2):87-100.

Darboux F, Davy P, Gascuel-Odoux C, et al. Evolution of soil surface roughness and flowpath connectivity in overland flow experiments[J].Catena,2002,46(2):125-139.

郑子成,何淑勤,吴发启.降雨条件下地表糙度对片蚀的影响及其变化[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(增刊1):139-145.

王林华,汪亚峰,王健,等.地表粗糙度对黄土坡面产流机制的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(5):120-128.

唐辉,李占斌,李鹏,等.模拟降雨下坡面微地形量化及其与产流产沙的关系[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):127-133.

郑子成,吴发启,何淑勤,等.地表糙度对径流和产沙影响的室内试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(10):19-24.

Darboux F, Huang C. Does soil surface roughness increase or decrease water and particle transfers?[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2005,69(3):748.

吴发启,赵西宁,佘雕.坡耕地土壤水分入渗影响因素分析[J].水土保持通报,2003,23(1):16-18.

张梦,李冬杰,周玥.雨强和坡度对黄土坡面土壤侵蚀及氮磷流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):85-90.

张佳琪,王红,张瑞芳,等.雨强对片麻岩坡面径流养分流失规律的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):42-45.

张会茹,郑粉莉.不同降雨强度下地面坡度对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):40-43.

李桂芳.典型黑土区坡面土壤侵蚀影响因素与动力学机理研究[D].陕西杨凌:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2016.

肖培青,郑粉莉,姚文艺.坡沟系统坡面径流流态及水力学参数特征研究[J].水科学进展,2009,20(2):236-240.

Views

1383

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effect of Surface Land Fluctuation on Overland Flow in Sloping Farmland

Characteristics of Surface Confluence Network in Different Micro-topography Types of Purple Soil Slope Farmland

Related Author

LI Zhigang

LIANG Xinlan

HUANG Hongliang

LI Hemou

ZHAO Xiaodong

ZHOU Cangning

WANG Qingzhen

TANG Kai

Related Institution

No data

⁰