LIU Jingjing, MA Lan, XUE Mengjun, et al. Effect of Runoff and Sediment Reduction of Different Treatment by Litter of[J]. 2019, 33(4): 126-132.
DOI:
LIU Jingjing, MA Lan, XUE Mengjun, et al. Effect of Runoff and Sediment Reduction of Different Treatment by Litter of[J]. 2019, 33(4): 126-132. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.018.
Effect of Runoff and Sediment Reduction of Different Treatment by Litter of
Forest litter plays an important role in controlling soil erosion on slopes
but its control mechanism remains to be clarified. In this study
the effects of different litter cover on runoff and sediment yield on slopes were investigated by laboratory large-scale soil trough and artificial simulated rainfall test. The experiment was conducted under four rainfall intensities (30
60
90
120 mm/h) and three litter mulching treatments (bare slope control
direct laying of litter and net laying of litter). Setting up the net laying of litter
which is in order to study on litter reducing splash erosion with reducing kinetic energy of raindrops. Setting up the direct laying of litter
which is in order to study on blocking interception of litter increasing ground roughness. The results indicated that:(1) The initial runoff generation time of slopes was prolonged by 2.3~5.5 times with the existence of litter
and the net laying of litter was longer than that of direct laying.(2)Compared with bare soil slope
litter decreased the runoff velocity by 47.9%~62.3%
and the smaller the rainfall intensity
the more obvious the effect of litter on reducing the runoff velocity. (3) Litter significantly increases infiltration and decreases runoff
and the effect is more obvious when rainfall intensity is small. (4) litter can reduce runoff and sediment by more than 75%
and direct laying is more obvious
mainly because litter increases surface roughness and reduces flow velocity. This study provides a theoretical basis for the establishment of soil erosion model on vegetation slope
and provides a scientific basis for the construction of vegetation for soil erosion prevention and control.
Lowdermilk W C, Rowe P B. Still further studies on absorption of rainfall in its relations to surficial runoff and erosion[J]. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union,1934,15(2):509-515.
Miller J H, Allen H L, Zutter B R, et al. Soil and pine foliage nutrient responses 15 years after competing vegetation control and their correlation with growth for 13 loblolly pine plantations in the southern United States[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2006,36(10):2412-2425.
Anderson C J, Lockaby B G. Research gaps related to forest management and stream sediment in the United States[J]. Environmental Management,2011,47(2):303-313.
Yoshinobu S, Tomo'Omi K, Atsushi K, et al. Experimental analysis of moisture dynamics of litter layers:The effects of rainfall conditions and leaf shapes[J]. Hydrological Processes,2016,18(16):3007-3018.
Nagashima K, Yoshida S, Hosaka T. Patterns and factors in early-stage vegetation recovery at abandoned plantation clearcut sites in Oita, Japan:Possible indicators for evaluating vegetation status[J]. Journal of Forest Research,2009,14(3):135-146.