Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on Phosphorus (P) Loss by Surface Runoff and Apparent P Balance in the Vegetable-Rice Rotation Fields of Taihu Lake Region, China
|更新时间:2025-03-12
|
Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on Phosphorus (P) Loss by Surface Runoff and Apparent P Balance in the Vegetable-Rice Rotation Fields of Taihu Lake Region, China
GUO Zhi, LIU Hongjiang, ZHANG Yuefang, et al. Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on Phosphorus (P) Loss by Surface Runoff and Apparent P Balance in the Vegetable-Rice Rotation Fields of Taihu Lake Region, China[J]. 2019, 33(4): 102-109.
DOI:
GUO Zhi, LIU Hongjiang, ZHANG Yuefang, et al. Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on Phosphorus (P) Loss by Surface Runoff and Apparent P Balance in the Vegetable-Rice Rotation Fields of Taihu Lake Region, China[J]. 2019, 33(4): 102-109. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.015.
Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on Phosphorus (P) Loss by Surface Runoff and Apparent P Balance in the Vegetable-Rice Rotation Fields of Taihu Lake Region, China
We performed a field plot experiment (2015-2016) to study the effects of different fertilization modes on phosphorus (P) losses by surface runoff
the apparent P balance
and vegetable and rice yield in a vegetable-rice rotation field in Taihu Lake Basin
China under natural rainfall conditions. The results showed that surface runoff events were mainly distributed in the rice growing season with heavy rainfall (rainy and typhoon season)
which showed a significant positive linear correlation between the quantity of surface runoff water and rainfall capacity. And
phosphorus (TP) loss by surface runoff was also mainly distributed in the rice growing season
which accounted for 74.75%~81.46% of TP loss during the whole monitoring period including the vegetable and rice growing seasons. In T1 (conventional fertilizer application)
the average TP concentration of surface runoff water in the vegetable growing season (0.55 mg/L) was significantly higher than that of rice growing season (0.29 mg/L)
but TP loss (0.49 kg/hm2) was significantly lower than that of rice growing season (2.13 kg/hm2). Compared with T1
T2 (reducing application 31.17% of P compared with T1) and T3 (reducing application 49.75% of P compared with T1
in which
no P application during the rice growing season
and wheat straw biochar application during the vegetable growing season) could significantly reduce TP losses by surface runoff by 22.48% and 45.66% during the whole monitoring period
respectively. Furthermore
P surplus reached up to 260.90 kg/hm2
which showed significant fertilization mode dependence and growing season dependence. In which
P surplus mainly occurred in the vegetable growing season
which accounted for 70.63% of that in the whole monitoring period. Compared with T1
P surplus in T2 and T3 decreased significantly by 38.47% and 64.87%
respectively. Moreover
compared with T1
vegetable yield decreased significantly under T2 and/or T3
but no significant difference was found between T2 and T3 in vegetable yield
rice grain yield
and annual yield of vegetable and rice grain. These results suggested that no P application during rice growing season and appropriate wheat straw biochar application during the vegetable growing season had synergistic effect of phosphorus reduction
maintaining stable crop yield and apparent P balance in the vegetable-rice rotation field.
Heckrath G, Brookes P C, Poulton P R, et al. Phosphorus leaching from soils containing different phosphorus concentrations in the broadbalk experiment[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,1995,24(5):904-910.
Jordan C, Mcgucki N S O, Smith R V. Increased predicted losses of phosphorus to surface water from soils with high Olsen-P concentration[J].Soil Use and Management,2000,16(1):27-35.
Boesch D F, Brinsfield R B, Magnien R E. Chesapeake bay eutrophication:Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2000,30(2):303-320.
Sharpley A N, Daniel T, Sims T, et al. Agricultural phosphorus and eutrophication[M].Second Edition. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, ARS 149, 2003.
Tabuchi T. Consideration of water quality conservation of lakes[M]. Tokyo, Japan:Gihodoshuppan Co. Ltd.,2005.
Daniels R B, Gilliam J W. Sediment and chemical load reduction by grass and riparian filters[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1993,60:246-251.
Guo Z, Liu H J, Zhou W, et al. Characteristics of phosphorus losses due to surface runoff in a peach orchard and the effects of inter-planting white clover (
Trifolium Repens
L.) on fruit yield and qualit[J].Fresenius Environmental Bulletin,2016,25(12):5516-5527.
Sharpley A N, Menzer R G. The impact of soil and fertilizer phosphorus on the environment[J].Advances in Agronomy,1987,41:297-324.
Rees F, Simonnot M O, Morel J L. Short-term effects of biochar on soil heavy metal mobility are controlled by intra-particle diffusion and soil pH increase[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2014,65(1):149-161.
Lenmann J, Da Silva J P J, Steiner C, et al. Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological anthrosol and a ferralsol of the central amazon basin:Fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments[J].Plant and Soil,2003,249(2):343-357.
Laird D, Fleming P, Wang B Q, et al. Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil[J].Geoderma,2010,158(3):436-442.