Seasonal Variation of Soil Soluble Nitrogen Fractions in Plantation in Loess Hilly Region

ZHAO Manxing; BAI Erlei; LIU Hui; CAO Yangyang; WANG Wenqiang; XING Yingying

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.02.040

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Seasonal Variation of Soil Soluble Nitrogen Fractions in Plantation in Loess Hilly Region

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Seasonal Variation of Soil Soluble Nitrogen Fractions in Plantation in Loess Hilly Region
- Vol. 33, Issue 2, Pages: 257-263(2019)
- 作者机构：
  
  延安大学生命科学学院,陕西,延安,716000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.02.040
  CLC：
- Published：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
ZHAO Manxing, BAI Erlei, LIU Hui, et al. Seasonal Variation of Soil Soluble Nitrogen Fractions in Plantation in Loess Hilly Region[J]. 2019, 33(2): 257-263.
DOI：

ZHAO Manxing, BAI Erlei, LIU Hui, et al. Seasonal Variation of Soil Soluble Nitrogen Fractions in Plantation in Loess Hilly Region[J]. 2019, 33(2): 257-263. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.02.040.

摘要

为探究黄土丘陵区退耕还林后土壤可溶性氮养分积累的季节动态变化特征，以志丹县永宁镇沙棘和山杏林地为研究对象，采集0-10，10-20，20-30 cm土壤样品，分析土壤可溶性氮组分含量和比例的季节动态变化。结果表明：退耕还林可显著增加土壤硝态氮、铵态氮和可溶性有机氮含量，尤其是0-10 cm土层增加明显。0-10，10-20，20-30 cm土层间差异显著，沙棘林和山杏林间也达到显著差异水平。总体来看，硝态氮含量随季节变化明显，3月最高，3-6月下降，6-9月上升，9-11月又下降，11月最低。各样地间0-30 cm土层铵态氮含量变化幅度较小。可溶性有机氮含量随季节变化明显，6月最高，11月最低，3-6月上升，6-9月下降，9-11月又上升。可溶性有机氮含量季节变化规律与硝态氮变化规律相反。沙棘林地土壤可溶性氮含量较杏树林地高，且阳坡高于阴坡。0-30 cm土层可溶性氮组分以可溶性有机氮为主，占73.3%~99.0%，其次是硝态氮，占0.9%~24.3%；铵态氮所占比例最少，在2%以下。退耕还林措施可显著增加0-10 cm土层土壤可溶性氮含量，不同林分土壤可溶性氮含量增加不同，沙棘林地高于杏树林地。

Abstract

In order to investigate the seasonal dynamics of soil soluble nitrogen after returning farmland to forest in loess hilly region

the Hippophae rhamnoides forestland and Armeniaca vulgaris Lam. forestland in Yongning Town of Zhidan County were taken as the research object. Soil samples were collected in 0-10 cm

10-20 cm and 20-30 cm soil layers

and seasonal dynamic variation of the density and proportion of soil soluble nitrogen component were analyzed. The results showed that the measures of returning farmland to forest significantly increased the density of soil nitrate nitrogen

ammonium nitrogen and soluble organic nitrogen

especially in the 0-10 cm soil layer. There were significant differences in the above indexes among different soil layers and between H. rhamnoides forestland and A. vulgaris Lam. forestland. On the whole

nitrate nitrogen density varied significantly with seasons

the value was the highest in March

declined from March to June

increased from June to September

declined from September to November

and was the lowest in November. The ammonium nitrogen content in 0-30 cm soil layer varied little. The soluble organic nitrogen content varied significantly with seasons

and the highest and lowest value was found in June and November

respectively

and the content increased from March to June

declined from June to September and rised from September to November. The seasonal variation of soluble organic nitrogen density was opposite to that of nitrate nitrogen. The content of soluble nitrogen in H. rhamnoides forestland was higher than that in A. vulgaris Lam. forestland. The soluble nitrogen content of sunny slope was higher than that of shady slope. In 0-30 cm soil layer

the soluble nitrogen was mainly soluble organic nitrogen

accounting for 73.3%~99.0%

followed by nitrate nitrogen accounted for 0.9%~24.3%

and the proportion of ammonium nitrogen was the least

which was below 2%. The conversion of farmland to forest significantly increased the density of soluble nitrogen in 0-10 cm soil layer. The soluble nitrogen density increased differently in different forestlands

the value in H. rhamnoides forestland was higher than that in A. vulgaris Lam. forestland.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘苑秋,王芳,柯国庆,等.江西瑞昌石灰岩山区退耕还林对土壤有机碳的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(4):885-890.

Zhao F Z, Kang D, Han G H, et al. Soil stoichiometry and carbon storage in long-term afforestation soil affected by under story vegetation diversity[J].Ecological Engineering,2015,74:415-422.

韩新辉,杨改河,佟小刚,等.黄土丘陵区几种退耕还林地土壤固存碳氮效应[J].农业环境科学学报,2012,31(6):1172-1179.

高英志,汪诗平,韩兴国,等.退化草地恢复过程中土壤氮素状况以及与植被地上绿色生物量形成关系的研究[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(3):285-293.

章宪,范跃新,罗茜,等.凋落物和根系处理对杉木人工林土壤氮素的影响[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2014,9(2):39-44.

丁咸庆.亚热带典型森林土壤有机氮、可溶性和溶解性有机氮(SON/DON)特征研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2016.

肖好燕,刘宝,余再鹏,等.亚热带典型林分对表层和深层土壤可溶性有机碳、氮的影响[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(4):1031-1038.

赵路红,李昌珍,康迪,等.黄土丘陵区退耕地土壤可溶性氮组分季节变化与水热关系[J].生态学报,2018,38(2):689-697.

张彪,高人,杨玉盛,等.万木林自然保护区不同林分土壤可溶性有机氮含量[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(7):1635-1640.

杨绒.土壤中可溶性有机氮含量及影响因素研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2006.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:14-38.

Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning:Current knowledge and future challenges[J].Science,2001,294(5534):804-808.

王春阳,周建斌,董燕婕,等.黄土区6种植物凋落物与不同形态氮素对土壤微生物量碳氮含量的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(24):7092-7100.

Pajuste K, Frey J. Nitrogen mineralisation in podzol soils under boreal Scots pine and Norway spruce stands[J].Plant and Soil,2003,257(1):237-247.

陈哲,杨世琦,张晴雯,等.冻融对土壤氮素损失及有效性的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(4):1083-1094.

Wei X R, Shao M A, Fu X L, et al. The effects of land use on soil N mineralization during the growing season on the northern Loess Plateau of China[J].Geoderma,2011,160(3/4):590-598.

Uri V, Lõhmus K, Kund M, et al. The effect of land use type on net nitrogen mineralization on abandoned agricultural land:Silver birch stand versus grassland[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2008,255(1):226-233.

赵路红,李昌珍,康迪,等.黄土丘陵区植被恢复对土壤可溶性氮组分的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(10):3533-3542.

马红亮,闫聪微,高人,等.林下凋落物去除与施氮对针叶林和阔叶林土壤氮的影响[J].环境科学研究,2013,26(12):1316-1324.

寇萌,焦菊英,尹秋龙,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区主要草种枯落物的持水能力与养分潜在归还能力[J].生态学报,2015,35(5):1337-1349.

McKinley D C, Rice C W, Blair J M. Conversion of grassland to coniferous woodland has limited effects on soil nitrogen cycle processes[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2008,40(10):2627-2633.

Gelfand I, Yakir D. Influence of nitrite accumulation in association with seasonal patterns and mineralization of soil nitrogen in a semi-arid pine forest[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2008,40(2):415-424.

宋飘,张乃莉,马克平,等.全球气候变暖对凋落物分解的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(6):1327-1339.

王新源,赵学勇,李玉霖,等.环境因素对干旱半干旱区凋落物分解的影响研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(11):3300-3310.

Views

791

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Soil Moisture Dynamics of Armeniaca sibirica Plantation at Different Time Scales in Loess Hilly Region of Ningxia and the Influencing Factors

Response of Forest Stand Types to Soil Stoichiometric Characteristics, Microorganisms and Their Seasonal Dynamics in Liziping Nature Reserve

Vertical Characteristics and Seasonal Dynamics of Soil Nitrogen Components at Different Elevations in Liziping Nature Reserve, Sichuan

Characteristics of Soil Water Stable Aggregates and Relationship with Soil Properties During Vegetation Rehabilitation in Ningxia Loess Hilly Region

Characteristics and Main Influencing Factors of Rainfall Partitioning in Two Typical Forests in the Loess Hilly Region

Related Author

HAN Xinsheng

XU Hao

LIU Guangquan

CAO Yang

LU Qiwei

TUO Yunfei

FENG Yongyu

LI Jianqiang

Related Institution

College of Forestry， Northwest A&F University， Yangling

China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research， State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin

Institute of Forestry and Grassland Ecology， Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences， Ningxia Key Laboratory of Desertification Control and Soil and Water Conservation， Research Center for Ecological Restoration and Multi-Functional Forestry of Ningxia

Sichuan Liziping National Nature Reserve Management Bureau, Shimian

Key Laboratory of Forestry Resources Protection and Utilization in Yunnan Province

⁰