Distribution and Yield of Spring Wheat Under Drip Irrigation in Xinjiang

WAN Wenliang; GUO Pengfei; HU Yuyan; ZHANG Xiaoqian; ZHANG Kun; DIAO Ming

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.025

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Distribution and Yield of Spring Wheat Under Drip Irrigation in Xinjiang

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Distribution and Yield of Spring Wheat Under Drip Irrigation in Xinjiang
- Vol. 32, Issue 6, Pages: 166-174(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 石河子大学农学院,新疆,石河子,832000
  2. 新疆生产建设兵团绿洲生态农业重点实验室,新疆,石河子,832000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.025
  CLC： S275.6;S512.1
- Published：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
WAN Wenliang, GUO Pengfei, HU Yuyan, et al. Distribution and Yield of Spring Wheat Under Drip Irrigation in Xinjiang[J]. 2018, 32(6): 166-174.
DOI：

WAN Wenliang, GUO Pengfei, HU Yuyan, et al. Distribution and Yield of Spring Wheat Under Drip Irrigation in Xinjiang[J]. 2018, 32(6): 166-174. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.025.

摘要

2017年和2018年在北疆滴灌春小麦栽培中，额定施氮量为纯氮300 kg/hm2，设置3个调亏灌水量（水分不调亏E1：100% ET0；水分中度调亏E2：80% ET0；水分重度调亏E3：60% ET0）和2个小麦品种（水分敏感型X1：新春22；水分不敏感型X2：新春44），灌溉频率为7天1次。研究不同处理对滴灌春小麦土壤水分、硝态氮分布及产量的影响。结果表明：（1）水分重度调亏（E3）可以缓解0—40 cm土壤水分和土壤硝态氮向深层流失，减少作物耗水量，提高水分利用效率。（2）新春22和新春44在土壤质量含水量、土壤硝态氮含量指标上无显著的品种间差异，小麦品种对于土壤理化性质的影响较小。（3）在水分中度调亏（E2）处理下，新春44（X2）能在节约大量灌水同时，提高水分利用效率，保持最适的氮素营养指数（NNI），进而使产量得到了显著的补偿，而新春22（X1）通过中度和重度调亏不能使产量得到有效的补偿。（4）在同一灌溉频率、施氮量水平下，品种对滴灌春小麦水分利用效率的影响大于调亏灌溉水平对滴灌春小麦水分利用效率的影响。（5）水分不敏感型品种新春44（X2）更适合在北疆地区采用调亏灌溉模式生产，综合考虑氮素营养指数（NNI）、耗水量、水分利用效率及产量，其最适的调亏灌溉水平为E2。

Abstract

In 2017 and 2018

a field experiment with three regulated deficit irrigation amounts (non-deficit E1:100% of ET0

moderate deficit E2:80% of ET0

severe deficit E3:60% of ET0) and two wheat varieties (water-sensitive type X1:Xin Chun 22

water-insensitive type X2:Xin Chun 44) were conducted with drip irrigation for spring wheat in northern Xinjiang. The same nitrogen level of 300 kg/hm2 and same irrigation frequency of one irrigation every 7 days were implemented. The soil moisture

nitrate nitrogen distribution and yield of spring wheat were studied. The results showed that:(1) These water deficit (E3) could alleviate soil water and nitrate nitrogen loss from 0-40 cm to the deep

it also reduced crop water consumption and improved water use efficiency. (2) There was no significant difference in soil mass moisture contents and soil nitrate nitrogen contents between Xin Chun 22 and Xin Chun 44

and wheat varieties had little influence on soil physical and chemical properties. (3) In moderate water deficit (E2)

Xin Chun 44 (X2) saved a lot of water

and simultaneously

it improved water use efficiency and maintained the optimum nitrogen nutrition index (NNI).And consequently

the output was significantly compensated. But Xin Chun 22 (X1) could not be effectively compensated by moderate and severe water deficit. (4) With the same level of the nitrogen application and irrigation frequency

the wheat varieties had greater effects than the levels of regulated deficit irrigation on drip irrigation water use efficiency of spring wheat. (5)Taking into account NNI

water consumption

water utilization efficiency and yield

Xin Chun 44 (X2) was more suitable plant with regulated deficit irrigation model in northern Xinjiang

and its optimal regulated deficit irrigation treatment was E2.

关键词

Keywords

references

Hui Y A, Tasheng D. Improved water use efficiency and fruit quality of greenhouse crops under regulated deficit irrigation in northwest china[J].Agricultural Water Management,2017,79:193-204.

张磊,李福生,王连喜,等.不同灌水处理对春小麦生长和产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(4):46-49.

成雪峰,张凤云,柴守玺,等.不同灌溉模式对春小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2007,26(2):80-82.

管建慧,张永平,蒋阿宁.不同灌溉对春小麦水分消耗特性和产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(8):272-276.

胡相明,赵艳云.小麦调亏灌溉研究及其应用前景展望[J].山东农业科学,2010,11(14):47-50.

Pandey R K, Maraville J W, Admou A. Tropical wheat response to irrigation and nitrogen in a Sahelian environment.I. Gain yield, yield components and water use efficiency[J].European Journal of Agronomy,2001,15(2):93-105.

孟兆江,段爱旺,王景雷,等.调亏灌溉对冬小麦根冠生长影响的试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2012,31(4):37-41.

Chalmers D J, Burge G, Jerie P H, et al. The mechanism of regulation of Bartlett pear fruit and vegetative growth by irrigation with holding and regulated deficit irrigation[J].Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,1986,111(6):904-907.

Dioufa O, Broub Y C, Dioufa M, et al. Response of pearl millet to nitrogen as affected by water deficit[J].Agronomie,2004,24(2):77-84.

彭新新,刘琪,刁明,等.基于临界氮浓度的滴灌春小麦氮素营养诊断[J].麦类作物学报,2015,35(7):1009-1015.

黄高宝,张恩和.调亏灌溉条件下春小麦玉米间套农田水、肥与根系的时空协调性研究[J].农业工程学报,2002,18(1):53-57.

张步翀,赵文智,张炜.春小麦调亏灌溉对土壤氮素养分的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,16(5):1095-1099.

王冀川,徐翠莲,韩秀锋.不同土壤水分对滴灌春小麦生长、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].农业现代化研究,2011,32(1):115-119.

蒋光昱,杨培岭,任树梅.调亏滴灌对土壤水盐分布与河套蜜瓜产量的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2015,20(6):198-204.

魏雅芬,张春满.不同灌溉方式下果园土壤水分分布规律及合理灌溉研究[J].北方园艺,2017,41(3):178-181.

薛丽华,胡锐,赛力汗,等.滴灌量对冬小麦耗水特性和干物质积累分配的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2013,33(1):78-83.

孟维伟,张微,张永丽.灌水对不同小麦品种耗水特性和土壤硝态氮运移的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2011,31(6):1123-1129.

张伟,李鲁华,吕新,等.不同灌水量对滴灌春小麦根系时空分布、水分利用率及产量的影响[J].西北农业学报,2016,25(3):361-371.

孟兆江,段爱旺,王景雷.调亏灌溉对冬小麦不同生育阶段水分蒸散的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):198-202.

张步翀,李凤民.调亏灌溉对春小麦土壤水分动态的影响研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2006,25(4):52-55.

杜军,杨培岭,李云开,等.灌溉、施肥和浅水埋深对小麦产量和硝态氮淋溶损失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(2):57-64.

石玉,于振文,何建宁,等.不同测墒补灌水对小麦水氮利用及土壤硝态氮淋溶的影响[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(2):445-452.

栗丽,洪坚平,王宏庭,等.氮素和灌溉互作对冬小麦氮素吸收和分布以及土壤中硝酸盐的积累的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(3):138-148.

刘新宇,张丽娟,袁金丽,等.耕层水氮调控对小麦利用土壤深层累积硝态氮的影响[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(17):3564-3571.

李国安,蒋静,马娟娟,等.咸水灌溉对土壤水盐分布和小麦产量的影响[J].排灌机械工程学报,2018,36(6):544-552.

李卫民,周凌云.水肥(氮)对小麦生理生态的影响[J].土壤通报,2004,35(2):136-142.

王小燕,张永丽,于振文.水氮互作对济麦20籽粒蛋白质品质及氮素和水分利用效率的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2010,30(2):318-325.

山仑.旱地农业技术发展趋向[J].中国农业科学,2002,35(7):848-855.

郭相平,康绍忠,索丽生.苗期调亏处理对玉米根系生长影响的试验研究[J].灌溉排水,2001,20(1):25-27.

霍东亮,孔维萍.调亏灌溉对作物土壤含水量及生长特性的影响[J].农艺农技,2017,22(4):72-73.

魏虹,林魁,李凤民,等.有限灌溉对半干旱区春小麦根系发育的影响[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(1):106-110.

吴金芝,王志敏,李友军.干旱胁迫下不同抗旱性小麦品种产量形成与水分利用特征[J].中国农业大学学报,2015,20(6):25-35.

董宝娣,师长海,乔匀周,等.不同灌溉条件下不同类型冬小麦产量水分利用效率差异原因分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2011,19(5):1096-1103.

Panda R K, Behera S K, Kashyap P S. Effective management of irrigation water for wheat under stressed conditions[J].Agricultural Water Management,2004,66(3):181-203.

Li F M, Liu X L, Guo A H. Effects of early soil moisture distribution on the dry matter partition between root and shoot of winter wheat[J].Agricultural Water Management,2001,49(2):163-171.

Views

1285

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effects of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Growth and Yield of

Effects of Regulated Deficit Micro-sprinkler Irrigation on the Yield, Quality and Water Utilization of Artificial Grassland in Alpine Desert Area

Effects of Heterotrophic Ammonia-oxidizing Bacteria on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Dryland Maize

Effects of Organic Manure and Other Nitrogen Substitutes on Spring Maize Growth, Yield, and Water and Fertilizer Utilization Efficiency

Micro-rainwater Catchment and Planting Technique of Ridge Film Mulching and Furrow Seeding of Corn in Dryland

Related Author

ZHOU Chenli

ZHANG Hengjia

BA Yuchun

LI Fuqiang

WANG Lu

WANG Jinghai

LI Guang

YU Xiaoxiong

Related Institution

College of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University

Administration of Hongshuihe River, Minle

College of Forestry of Gansu Agricultural University

College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering of Gansu Agricultural University

Gansu Water Resources and Hydroelectric Investigation, Design & Research Institute Corporation Limited

⁰