Slope Distribution and Water Holding Characteristics of Typical Vegetation Litter on the Loess Plateau

WANG Jianfang; WANG Bing; WANG Zhongyu; LI Zhaosong; XIAO Jing

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.022

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Slope Distribution and Water Holding Characteristics of Typical Vegetation Litter on the Loess Plateau

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Slope Distribution and Water Holding Characteristics of Typical Vegetation Litter on the Loess Plateau
- Vol. 32, Issue 4, Pages: 139-144(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
  3. 中国科院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.022
  CLC：
- Published：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
WANG Jianfang, WANG Bing, WANG Zhongyu, et al. Slope Distribution and Water Holding Characteristics of Typical Vegetation Litter on the Loess Plateau[J]. 2018, 32(4): 139-144.
DOI：

WANG Jianfang, WANG Bing, WANG Zhongyu, et al. Slope Distribution and Water Holding Characteristics of Typical Vegetation Litter on the Loess Plateau[J]. 2018, 32(4): 139-144. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.022.

摘要

选取黄土高原丘陵沟壑区刺槐、柠条、铁杆蒿、白羊草4种典型植被样地，系统研究枯落物蓄积量、持水量和拦蓄量变化情况。结果表明：（1）枯落物地表蓄积量（0.14~0.83 kg/m2）和土壤中混入量（0.18~0.66 kg/m2）均表现为林地>灌木林地>草地，而土壤中枯落物所占比重（44.1%~73.5%）则表现为草地>灌木林地>林地；林地（刺槐和柠条）地表枯落物和土壤中枯落物沿坡长均表现为增加—减少交替的周期性变化，草地（白羊草和铁杆蒿）则随坡长的增大而增加。（2）枯落物持水量可表示为浸泡时间的对数函数（R2≥0.89，p<0.01）；白羊草样地地表枯落物持水量最高，刺槐林地土壤中枯落物持水量最高；土壤中枯落物最大持水量均不同程度地高于地表枯落物（1.9~2.5倍）。（3）土壤中枯落物有效拦蓄量校正系数为0.34~0.48，普遍小于地表枯落物；地表和土壤中枯落物有效拦蓄量分别为2.4~12.5 t/hm2和1.6~5.8 t/hm2，其中林地土壤中枯落物有效拦蓄量低于地表枯落物，而草地则高于地表枯落物。总体而言，刺槐样地枯落物总有效拦蓄量最大（16.4 t/hm2），是其他样地的1.5~4.1倍。研究结果为评价黄土高原典型植被枯落物持水特征、深入理解植被恢复水文效应提供重要依据。

Abstract

Influenced by vegetation types

there are significant differences in the distribution and water holding characteristics of litter. This study selected four typical vegetation plots of Robinia psendoacacia

Caragana intermedia

Artemisia gmelinii and Bothriochlo aischaemum in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau

and studied the changes of litter volume

water holding capacity and storage capacity. The results showed that:(1) The surface litter volume (0.14~0.83 kg/m2) and soil litter volume (0.18~0.66 kg/m2) were both followed the order of forest land>shrub land>grassland

while the proportion of soil litter to total litter volume (44.1%~73.5%) was grassland>shrub land>forest land. Surface litters and soil litters in both R. psendoacacia and C. intermedia forest lands showed an alternate cycle of increasing and decreasing along the slope. However

the surface litter and soil litter increased with the increasing of slope length. (2) The water holding capacity of the litter was a logarithmic function of soaking time (R2 ≥ 0.89

p<0.01). The water holding capacity of the surface litter of B. aischaemum was the highest

and the water holding capacity of the soil litter of R. psendoacacia forest was the highest. The maximum water holding capacity of soil litter was higher than that of surface litter in varying degrees

which was 1.9~2.5 times higher than that of surface litter. (3) The correction coefficient of effective interception of soil litter was 0.34~0.48

which was generally less than that of surface litter. The effective storage capacity of ground litter and soil litter was 2.4~12.5 t/hm2 and 1.6~5.8 t/hm2

respectively. The effective storage capacity of soil litter was lower than that of surface litter in forest land

while the opposite trend was found in the grassland. In general

the total effective interception of litter in R. pseudoacacia plot was the maximum (16.4 t/hm2)

which was 1.5~4.1 times that of other plots. The results provided an important basis for evaluating the water-holding characteristics of litter in typical vegetation and understanding the hydrological effects of vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau.

关键词

Keywords

references

Bray J R, Gorham E. Litter production in forests of the world[J]. Advance in Ecological Research,1964,2(8):101-157.

郝占庆,王力华.辽东山区主要森林类型林地土壤蓄水性能研究[J].应用生态学报,1998,9(3):237-241.

栾莉莉,张光辉,孙龙,等.黄土丘陵区典型植被枯落物持水性能空间变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):225-230.

王谦,孙保平,丁国栋,等.陕西榆林樟子松人工林土壤及枯落物水文效应[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(8):123-132.

Mcculloch J S G, Robinson M. History of forest hydrology[J]. Journal of Hydrology,1993,150(2/4):189-216.

剪文灏,李淑春,陈波,等.冀北山区3种典型森林类型枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):144-147.

施爽,郭继勋.松嫩草原3种主要植物群落枯落物层生态水文功能[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(8):1722-1726.

牛勇,刘洪禄,张志强,等.北京地区典型树种及非生物因子对枯落物水文效应的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(8):183-189.

张振明,于新晓,牛健值,等.不同林分枯落物层的水文功能[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):139-143.

王金建,崔培学,刘霞,等.小流域水土保持修复区森林枯落物的持水性能[J].中国水土保持科学,2005,8(3):48-52.

丁绍兰,杨乔媚,赵串串,等.黄土丘陵区不同林分类型枯落物层及其林下土壤持水能力研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):104-108.

Dunkerley D. Percolation through leaf litter:What happens during rainfall level of varying intensity[J].Journal of Hydrology,2015,525:737-746.

杨吉华,张永涛,李红云,等.不同林分枯落物持水性能及对表层土壤理化性状的影响[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):141-144.

Foster G R. Advances in wind and water erosion prediction[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,46(1):27-29.

马雪华,杨茂瑞,胡星弼.亚热带杉木、马尾松人工林水文功能的研究[J].林业科学,1993,29(3):199-206.

赵鸿雁,吴钦孝,刘国彬.黄土高原人工油松林枯枝落叶层的水土保持功能研究[J].林业科学,2003,29(1):168-172.

Williams J R, Sharply A N.EPIC-Erosion productivity impact calculator I.Model documentation[M].Washington D C:US Department of Agriculture,1990:1768.

叶海英,赵廷宁,赵陟峰.半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区几种不同人工水土保持林枯落物储量及持水特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(1):121-125.

时忠杰,王彦辉,徐丽宏,等.六盘山主要森林类型枯落物的水文功能[J].北京林业大学学报,2009,31(1):91-99.

薛志婧.黄土丘陵区草地生态系统典型植物枯落物分解特征研究.陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2015.

Tsukamoto J. Downhill movement of litter and its implication for ecological studies in three types of forest in Japan[J]. Ecological Research,1991,6(3):333-345.

樊登星,余新晓,岳永杰.北京西山不同林分枯落物层持水特性研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,30(2):177-181.

李超,董希斌,李芝茹.大兴安岭低质林皆伐改造后枯落物持水性能的研究[J].东北林业大学学报,2012,40(4):92-96.

Views

1316

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Characteristics of Soil Water Percolation and Conservation in Different Aged Paddy Field

Comparison of Water Holding Capacities of Litter in Different Types of

Related Author

ZHANG Jun1

YI Jun1

LIU Muxing1

LI Shenglong1

YUAN Xiujin

Related Institution

Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis＆Simulation of Hubei Province

College of Urban and Environmental Sciences,Central China Normal University

Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment, State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forest Ecological, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry

Hubei Academy of Forestry

Key Laboratory of Forest Silviculture, State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry

⁰