Dynamic Characteristics of Soil Light and Heavy Fraction Organic Carbon During Vegetation Degradation in Gahai Wetland

XU Yanzhao; MA Weiwei; LI Guang; WU Jiangqi; SUN Wenying

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.032

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Dynamic Characteristics of Soil Light and Heavy Fraction Organic Carbon During Vegetation Degradation in Gahai Wetland

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Dynamic Characteristics of Soil Light and Heavy Fraction Organic Carbon During Vegetation Degradation in Gahai Wetland
- Vol. 32, Issue 3, Pages: 205-211(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  甘肃农业大学林学院,兰州,730070
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.032
  CLC：
- Published：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
XU Yanzhao, MA Weiwei, LI Guang, et al. Dynamic Characteristics of Soil Light and Heavy Fraction Organic Carbon During Vegetation Degradation in Gahai Wetland[J]. 2018, 32(3): 205-211.
DOI：

XU Yanzhao, MA Weiwei, LI Guang, et al. Dynamic Characteristics of Soil Light and Heavy Fraction Organic Carbon During Vegetation Degradation in Gahai Wetland[J]. 2018, 32(3): 205-211. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.032.

摘要

以甘肃省甘南尕海湿地内的沼泽化草甸为研究对象，采用野外取样和室内测试相结合的方法，研究植被退化过程中土壤轻重组有机碳含量及动态变化。结果表明：不同植被退化阶段0—20 cm土壤轻组有机碳含量差异显著（P<0.05），表现为未退化>轻度退化>重度退化>中度退化；20—100 cm土壤轻组有机碳受植被影响较小。整个土壤剖面重组有机碳含量表现为中度和重度退化显著高于未退化和轻度退化（P<0.05）。土壤轻重组有机碳含量均随土壤剖面下降显著降低（P<0.05）。各退化阶段沼泽化草甸土壤轻重组有机碳均呈现出明显的时间变化，在0—20 cm土层，未退化阶段轻组有机碳表现为"降—升—降"的变化趋势，即5月最高，7月和9月最低，其他各退化阶段则在6月降低并趋于稳定；20—100 cm土层轻组有机碳变化幅度较小。各退化阶段土壤重组有机碳动态变化较为一致，均随时间延长呈线性下降，不同月份之间差异显著（P<0.05）。说明植被退化导致轻组有机碳含量下降，重组有机碳增加，而在植被生长过程中主要消耗轻组有机碳，重组有机碳相对稳定。相关分析表明，地下生物量与土壤含水量的变化对土壤轻重组有机碳影响显著。

Abstract

In order to study the contents and dynamic characteristics of soil light and heavy fraction organic carbon during the vegetation degradation process

the filed and laboratory experiments were conducted in marsh meadow of Gahai wetland in Gannan state

Gansu province. The main results were as follows:The soil light fraction organic carbon contents in 0-20 cm layers varied in different stages of vegetation degradation of marsh meadow

following the order of UD (undegraded) > LD (lightly degraded) > HD (heavily degraded) > MD (moderately degraded). The soil light fraction organic carbon in 20-100 cm layer was less effected by vegetation degradation. The soil heavy fraction organic carbon contents HD and MD stages of vegetation degradation were significant higher than UD and LD in entire soil layer (P<0.05). With the increasing soil layers

all the soil light and heavy fraction organic carbon contents significantly decreased. The soil light and heavy fraction organic carbon showed the obvious dynamic characteristics with time in all stages of vegetation degradation. The soil light fraction organic carbon contents gave a trend of "down-up-down" in UD stages of vegetation degradation in 0-20 cm soil layer

i.e.

the highest in May

the lowest in July and September. But the contents were reduced and stabilized in June in the other stages of vegetation degradation. The variations of soil light fraction organic carbon contents was small in 20-100 cm soil layers. The variations of soil heavy fraction organic carbon contents were consistent in all stages

giving linear decreases with time

the significant difference occurred between different months (P<0.05). These findings indicated that vegetation degradation could result in the decreases of soil light fraction organic carbon

and the increases of heavy fraction organic carbon. However

the main consumption of soil organic carbon is the light fraction

and the heavy fraction is relatively stable. Correlation analysis showed that the changes of underground biomass and soil moisture contents had significant influence on soil light and heavy fraction organic carbon.

关键词

Keywords

references

IPCC.Climate change 2001:The scientific basis[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001.

潘根兴,赵其国.我国农田土壤碳库演变研究:全球变化和国家粮食安全[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(4):384-393.

高菲,姜航,崔晓阳.小兴安岭两种森林类型土壤有机碳库及周转[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(7):1913-1920

王发刚,王启基,王文颖,等.土壤有机碳研究进展[J].草业科学,2008,25(2):48-52.

Christensen B T. Physical fractionation of soil and organic matter in primary particle size and density separates[J]. Advances in Soil Science,1992,20:1-90.

Hassink J. Decomposition rate constants of size and density fraction of soil organic matter[J]. Soil Science Society of Am Journal,1995,59:1631-1635.

张文敏,吴明,王蒙,等.杭州湾湿地不同植被类型下土壤有机碳及其组分分布特征[J].土壤学报,2014,51(6):1351-1360.

黎明,李伟.湿地碳循环研究进展[J].华中农业大学学报,2009,28(1):116-123.

O'connell M J. Detecting, measuring and reversing changes to wetland[J].Wetlands Ecology and Management,2003,11:397-401.

Lal R, Fausey N R, Eckert D J. Land use and soil management effects on emissions of radiatively active gases from two soils in Ohio[C]//Lal R, Kimble J, Kimble J, et al. Soil management and Greenhouse Effect. Florida:CRC Press,1995:41-59.

逄好胜.大兴安岭南坡植被退化对土壤微生物群落多样性的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2016.

连树清,王辉,马维伟.尕海湿地泥炭土土壤理化性质[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2009,44(3):128-132.

刘帆,刘晖,徐凌翔,等.青藏高原东部尕海湿地种子库沿水位梯度的分布格局[J].科学通报,2013,58(14):1332-1339.

马维伟,王辉,王跃思,等.甘南尕海泥炭沼泽地退化过程土壤特征和水源涵养功能的变化[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(9):1531-1541.

黄蓉,王辉,马维伟,等.尕海洪泛湿地退化过程中土壤理化性质的变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(5):221-227.

魏文彬,李婷,李俊臻.尕海湿地生态系统的保护与管理[J].湿地科学与管理,2010,6(3):32-34.

马维伟,王辉,李广,等.甘南尕海湿地不同植被退化阶段土壤有机碳含量及动态[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):254-259.

Janzen H H, Campbell C A, Brandt S A, et al. Light-fraction organic matter in soils from long-term crop rotations[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1992,56(6):1799-1806.

王合云,董智,郭建英,等.不同放牧强度对大针茅草原土壤全土及轻组碳氮储量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):101-106,207.

林丽,曹广民,李以康,等.人类活动对青藏高原高寒矮嵩草沼泽化草甸碳过程的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(15):4012-4018.

刘育红,魏卫东,温小成,等.三江源退化高寒草原土壤有机碳组分分布研究[J].土壤通报,2014,45(6):1370-1376.

王文颖,王启基,鲁子豫.高寒草甸土壤组分碳氮含量及草甸退化对组分碳氮的影响[J].中国科学(D辑:地球科学),2009,39(5):647-654.

蔡晓布,彭岳林,于宝政,等.不同状态高寒草原主要土壤活性有机碳组分的变化[J].土壤学报,2013,50(2):315-323.

魏朝富,谢德体,陈世正.紫色水稻土有机无机复合与土粒团聚的关系[J].土壤学报,1996,33(1):70-77.

雷利国,江长胜,郝庆菊.缙云山土地利用方式对土壤轻组及颗粒态有机碳氮的影响[J].环境科学,2015,36(7):2669-2677.

陈芙蓉,程积民,刘伟,等.不同干扰对黄土高原典型草原土壤有机碳的影响[J].草地学报,2012,20(2):298-311.

Barrios E, Buresh R J, Sprent J I. Organic matter in soil particle size and density fractions from maize and legume cropping systems[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1996,28(2):185-193.

李洁,盛浩,周萍,等.亚热带丘陵几种林地土壤剖面有机碳和轻组有机碳的分布[J].土壤通报,2013,44(4):851-857.

谢锦升,杨玉盛,杨智杰,等.退化红壤植被恢复后土壤轻组有机质的季节动态[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(3):557-563.

Barrio E, Kwesiga F, Buresh R J, et al. Light fraction soil organic matter and available nitrogen following trees and maize[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1997,61(3):826-831.

马维伟,王辉,王修华,等.甘南尕海不同湿地类型土壤物理特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):194-198,220.

Jobbag E G, Jackson R B. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation[J].Ecological Applications,2000,10(2):423-436.

黄小娟,郝庆菊,吴艳.紫色水稻土轻组有机质的季节动态研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(12):1579-1585.

侯翠翠,宋长春,李英臣,等.不同水分条件下小叶章湿地表土有机碳及活性有机碳组分季节动态[J].环境科学,2011,32(1):290-297.

Views

1532

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effect of Long-term Different Fertilizer Management on Soil Carbon Stock Characteristics in Paddy Soil

Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon Mineralization During Vegetation Degradation in the Gahai Wetland, China

Related Author

LIAO Min

PENG Ying

CHEN Yi

谢晓梅

XIE Xiao-mei

WU Chun-yan

TANG Xu

LIU Yu-xue

Related Institution

LIAO Min1,PENG Ying1,CHEN Yi2,3,XIE Xiao-mei1,WU Chun-yan2,TANG Xu2,LIU Yu-xue2,YANG Sheng-mao2,3(1.Department of Resource Science,College of Environmental and Resource Science,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,2.Institute of Environmental Resources and Soil Fertilizer,Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science,Hangzhou 310021,3.Key Field Station for Monitoring of Eco-Environment of Paddy Soil in Hangzhou,the Ministry of Agriculture,Haining,)

浙江省农业科学院环境资源与土壤肥料研究所

农业部杭州水稻土生态环境重点野外科学观测实验站

⁰