Comparation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics and Flow Resistance Under Rill Erosion Between Saturated and Unsaturated Loess Soil

XING Hang; CHEN Xiaoyan; HAN Zhen; HUANG Yongchao; LI Yanhai

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.015

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics and Flow Resistance Under Rill Erosion Between Saturated and Unsaturated Loess Soil

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Comparation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics and Flow Resistance Under Rill Erosion Between Saturated and Unsaturated Loess Soil
- Vol. 32, Issue 3, Pages: 92-97(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  西南大学资源环境学院,重庆,400716
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.015
  CLC：
- Published：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
XING Hang, CHEN Xiaoyan, HAN Zhen, et al. Comparation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics and Flow Resistance Under Rill Erosion Between Saturated and Unsaturated Loess Soil[J]. 2018, 32(3): 92-97.
DOI：

XING Hang, CHEN Xiaoyan, HAN Zhen, et al. Comparation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics and Flow Resistance Under Rill Erosion Between Saturated and Unsaturated Loess Soil[J]. 2018, 32(3): 92-97. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.015.

摘要

近地表水文状况显著影响坡面土壤侵蚀过程。土壤饱和状态作为一种特殊的近地表水文状况，其细沟侵蚀特征较之非饱和状态存在明显的差异。以黄绵土为研究对象，采用限定性细沟模拟冲刷，对比研究了饱和与非饱和状态下黄绵土的水动力特征和侵蚀阻力。结果表明：饱和黄绵土径流流速与坡度、流量之间符合良好的幂函数关系，坡度对流速的影响更甚；饱和黄绵土径流流速约为非饱和黄绵土的1.17倍，其坡面摩擦阻力仅为非饱和黄绵土的70.3%；同种工况下，非饱和黄绵土的径流含沙量和细沟径流动能明显偏低，随着径流动能增大，2种土的径流含沙量均呈现对数型增长，径流含沙量峰值稳定在400，280 kg/m3内；饱和与非饱和黄绵土的细沟可蚀性参数分别为0.088，0.057 kg/（m2·s），相应的土壤临界剪切力分别为0.773，1.561 Pa，表明饱和黄绵土更易剥蚀、流失。

Abstract

The hydrological condition of the near surface plays a vital role in the slope soil erosion process. The characteristics of soil erosion in saturated soil were different from that in unsaturated loess soil. In the study

loess soil was adopted in the well-defined rill simulation scouring experiment to explore the different hydrodynamic characteristics and flow resistance between saturated and unsaturated soil conditions. Results showed that the rill flow velocity of saturated soil had good power function with slope gradient and flow rate

and the slope gradient had a greater impact on the velocity. The rill flow velocity of saturated soil was about 1.17 times that of unsaturated loess soil

while the friction resistance of slope surface under saturated state was only 70.3% compared with that in unsaturated condition. Under the same conditions

the rill flow energy and sediment concentration of unsaturated soil were much lower than those of saturated soil. With the increase of rill flow energy

the sediment concentration of both kinds of soil showed a logarithmic growth

and the peak value of rill flow sediment concentration was stable at about 400 and 280 kg/m3

respectively. Saturated and unsaturated loess soil erodibility parameters were 0.088 and 0.057 kg/(m2·s)

and the critical shear stress were 0.773 and 1.561 Pa correspondingly

indicating that saturated soil was much easier to be dispersed and eroded by water.

关键词

Keywords

references

赵晓光.黄土塬区坡面水蚀作用过程[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(3):122-124.

肖培青,郑粉莉,汪晓勇,等.黄土坡面侵蚀方式演变与侵蚀产沙过程试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):24-27.

Miao C Y, Ni J R, Borthwick A G L. Recent changes of water discharge and sediment load in the Yellow River basin, China[J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 2010, 34(4):541-561.

郑庆福,刘艇,赵兰坡,等.东北黑土耕层土壤黏粒矿物组成的区域差异及其演化[J].土壤学报,2010,47(4):734-746.

王旭艳,王志强,宋维念,等.东北典型黑土耕层颗粒组成与腐殖质层厚度的关系[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(1):39-44.

Shruthi R B V, Kerle N, Jetten V, et al. Quantifying temporal changes in gully erosion areas with object oriented analysis[J]. Catena, 2015, 128:262-277.

Wischmeier W H, Mannering J V. Relation of soil properties to its erodibility[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1969, 33(1):131-137.

陈云明,刘国彬,郑粉莉,等.RUSLE侵蚀模型的应用及进展[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(4):80-83.

肖培青,姚文艺.WEPP模型的侵蚀模块理论基础[J].人民黄河,2005,27(6):38-39,50.

Nouwakpo S K. Impact of vertical hydraulic gradient on rill erodibility and critical shear stress[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2010, 74(6):1914-1921.

Abdul S T, Al-Madhhachi A T, Hanson G J, et al. Deriving parameters of a fundamental detachment model for cohesive soils from flume and jet erosion tests[J]. Transactions of The Asabe, 2013, 56(2):489-504.

Singh H V, Thompson A M. Effect of antecedent soil moisture content on soil critical shear stress in agricultural watersheds[J]. Geoderma, 2016, 262:165-173.

蔡太义,贾志宽,黄耀威,等.不同秸秆覆盖量对春玉米田蓄水保墒及节水效益的影响[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(增刊1):238-243.

徐晗,朱以文,蔡元奇,等.降雨入渗条件下非饱和土边坡稳定分析[J].岩土力学,2005,26(12):1957-1962.

Bullock M S, Nelson S D, Kemper W D. Soil cohesion as affected by freezing, water content, time and tillage[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1988, 52(3):770-776.

Chen C, Ban Y, Wang X, et al. Measuring flow velocity on frozen and non-frozen slopes of black soil through leading edge method[J]. International Soil & Water Conservation Research, 2017, 5(3):180-189.

李永红,牛耀彬,王正中,等.工程堆积体坡面径流水动力学参数及其相互关系[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(22):83-88.

张乐涛,高照良,田红卫.工程堆积体陡坡坡面土壤侵蚀水动力学过程[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(24):94-102.

赵宇.黄土细沟侵蚀过程冲刷试验研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2015.

李鹏,李占斌,郑良勇.黄土坡面径流侵蚀产沙动力过程模拟与研究[J].水科学进展,2006,17(4):444-449.

张婧.土壤入渗与优先流测量方法研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2017.

米宏星,陈晓燕,赵宇,等.黄土坡面细沟径流流速的试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(1):66-69,110.

雷阿林,唐克丽.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀的动力条件[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1998,4(3):39-43,72.

赵宇,陈晓燕,米宏星,等.基于体积法对黄土细沟侵蚀沿程分布模拟的研究[J].土壤学报,2014,51(6):1234-1241.

Shainberg I, Laflen J M, Bradford J M, et al. Hydraulic flow and water quality characteristics in rill erosion[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994, 58(4):1007-1012.

Gilley J E, Elliot W J, Laflen J M, et al. Critical shear stress and critical flow rates for initiation of rilling[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1993, 142(1/4):251-271.

Huang C, Laflen J M, Bradford J M. Evaluation of the detachment transport coupling concept in the WEPP rill erosion equation[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1996, 60(3):734-739.

雷廷武,张晴雯,闫丽娟.细沟侵蚀物理模型[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:77-91.

Views

1531

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effects of 70-Year Conversion from Forest and Grassland to Cropland on Soil Properties and Erodibility in Black Soil Region of Northeast China

Research on the Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Erodibility Factors of the Loess Plateau

Effects of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Erodibility and Nutrients at Different Slope Sites in Northern Hebei Mountains

Response of Soil Erodibility on the Loess Plateau to the Grain to Green Program

Effects of

Related Author

ZHANG Zhuodong

CHEN Lei

ZHOU Zhengchao

LIU June

ZHU Qiming

YU Xinxiao

JIA Guodong

WU Yuxin

Related Institution

Faculty of Geographical Science， Beijing Normal University

College of Geography and Environmental Science， Northwest Normal University

School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xian

School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling

⁰