Physiological Responses of Zelkova schneideriana ‘Hentiangao’ to Different Drought Stresses During Seedling Stage and its Evaluation of Drought Resistance

ZENG Yan1; JIN Xiaoling1

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.01.044

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Physiological Responses of Zelkova schneideriana ‘Hentiangao’ to Different Drought Stresses During Seedling Stage and its Evaluation of Drought Resistance

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Physiological Responses of Zelkova schneideriana ‘Hentiangao’ to Different Drought Stresses During Seedling Stage and its Evaluation of Drought Resistance
- Vol. 32, Issue 1, Pages: 280-285(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中南林业科技大学风景园林学院,长沙,410004
  2. 湖南省环境资源植物开发与利用工程技术研究中心,长沙,410000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.01.044
  CLC： Q945.78
- Published：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
ZENG Yan1, JIN Xiaoling1. Physiological Responses of Zelkova schneideriana ‘Hentiangao’ to Different Drought Stresses During Seedling Stage and its Evaluation of Drought Resistance[J]. 2018, 32(1): 280-285.
DOI：

ZENG Yan1, JIN Xiaoling1. Physiological Responses of Zelkova schneideriana ‘Hentiangao’ to Different Drought Stresses During Seedling Stage and its Evaluation of Drought Resistance[J]. 2018, 32(1): 280-285. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.01.044.

摘要

以大叶榉新品种‘恨天高’及普通大叶榉的幼苗为供试材料，采用盆栽控水人工模拟轻度、中度和重度干旱胁迫环境的方法，研究了供试材料对不同程度干旱胁迫的生理响应，筛选出了适合评价大叶榉的抗旱性生理指标，并结合隶属函数值对供试材料的抗旱性进行了综合评价。结果表明：（1）随着干旱胁迫程度的加剧，2种供试材料的Rec、MDA含量、WSD和Pro含量呈持续上升趋势；2种供试材料的POD活性、SOD活性和Chl含量随着干旱胁迫程度的加深，呈现先上升后下降的“抛物线”趋势；（2）‘恨天高’其SS含量随着干旱胁迫的加剧而逐渐升高，但普通大叶榉其SS含量呈先上升后下降的趋势；（3）Rec、MDA、WSD、Pro和POD这5个生理指标的含量变化与大叶榉的抗旱性密切相关，可以作为大叶榉抗旱性评价指标；通过对大叶榉的8项抗旱生理指标的隶属函数值进行计算，以及与主成分分析结果对各指标进行合成的综合指数表明“恨天高”（0.58）的抗旱性稍强于普通大叶榉（0.56）；（4）‘恨天高’其抗旱能力与侧柏等景观绿化树种相当，从抗旱性来看符合城市景观绿化及高速公路绿化的应用要求。

Abstract

To examine the physiological responses of Z. schneideriana seedlings to drought stress and to screen out the physiological indexes of drought resistance

a pot water control test was conducted. The drought resistance was also evaluated based on the membership function values. Two materials (Z.schneiderana ‘Hentiangao’and common Z.schneideriana grafted seedlings) were studied under three water conditions: light drought (LD)

moderate drought (MD) and severe drought (SD). The results showed that with the increase of drought stress

the contents of the relative electric conductivity (Rec)

malondialdehyde (MDA)

water saturation deficit (WSD) and free proline (Pro) of the two testing materials were increased. And their peroxidase (POD) activity

superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and chlorophyll (Chl) contents also increased with the changed drought stress

as a 'parabola' trend. The SS contents increased with the increase of drought stress for Z. schneideriana ‘Hentiangao’

but increased first and then decreased for Z. schneiderian. Principal component analysis based on 8 drought stress indexes hinted that Rec

MDA

WSD

Pro and POD had the close relationships with the drought resistance of Z.schneideriana

and could be used to evaluate its drought resistance. The calculated membership function values of the 8 physiological indexes and the comprehensive index from the principal component analysis indicted that the drought resistance of ‘Hentiangao’ (0.58) is stronger than the common Z. schneideriana’s (0.56). Considering the drought resistance of ‘Hentiangao’ is match with oriental arborvitae

it can meet the application requirements of urban landscape and highway greening from the point of drought resistance.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

1490

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effect of Drought Stress on Root Growth and Rhizosphere Nutrients of Maize (Zea mays L.)

Response of Water Use Strategies of Vegetation Community to Drought Stress in the Loess Hilly Region

Effect of Drought Stress on Root Growth and Rhizosphere Nutrients of Maize (Zea mays L.)

Effects of Drought Stress on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Pioneer Plant Neyraudia reynaudiana on Soil and Water Conservation

Related Author

SONG Feng-bin

HAN Xi-ying

ZHAO Xining

MA Nanfang

AN Qingrong

ZHAO Lianhao

GAO Xiaodong

LUO Lijiao

Related Institution

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS & MWR, Yangling

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling

College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A & F University, Yangling

Li-ping1,2,3,WU Peng-fei1,HOU Xiao-long1,MA Xiang-qing1,ZHANG Yun1,2(1.College of Forestry,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,2.Insititute of Forestry and Environment,3.Chinese Fir Research Center of Fujian,Fuzhou )

⁰