Soil and Water Loss on the Tilled Bare Land with Steep Slope in Rainfall-Erosion Processes

ZHAO Longshan1; 2

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.01.012

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Soil and Water Loss on the Tilled Bare Land with Steep Slope in Rainfall-Erosion Processes

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Soil and Water Loss on the Tilled Bare Land with Steep Slope in Rainfall-Erosion Processes
- Vol. 32, Issue 1, Pages: 74-79(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 贵州大学林学院,贵阳,550025
  2. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院，陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.01.012
  CLC： S157.2
- Published：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
ZHAO Longshan1, 2. Soil and Water Loss on the Tilled Bare Land with Steep Slope in Rainfall-Erosion Processes[J]. 2018, 32(1): 74-79.
DOI：

ZHAO Longshan1, 2. Soil and Water Loss on the Tilled Bare Land with Steep Slope in Rainfall-Erosion Processes[J]. 2018, 32(1): 74-79. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.01.012.

摘要

在坡耕地上，农业耕作措施改变了地表微地形，对坡地土壤侵蚀过程产生影响。深入了解耕作措施对坡地土壤侵蚀的影响，以便为开展陡坡耕地退耕还林（草）工程的水土保持效益评价提供科学依据。以30°陡坡耕地为研究对象，采用室内人工模拟降雨试验方法，对采用人工锄耕、人工掏挖和等高耕作的裸坡地土壤侵蚀特征进行研究。用相同坡度平整坡地作为对照措施。降雨强度为60，90，120 mm/h，降雨历时80 min。结果表明：（1）在陡坡耕地上，在雨强为60，90 mm/h时，3种耕作措施都具有延缓坡地产流的作用，但在雨强为120 mm/h时，人工锄耕和人工掏挖坡地产流开始时间与平整坡地无显著差异（P>0.05）；（2）对采用等高耕作的陡坡地，在3个降雨强度下，累计产流量均低于平整坡地，但采用人工锄耕和人工掏挖的陡坡地与平整坡地相比并无明显规律；（3）在降雨强度为120 mm/h时，耕作陡坡地地表径流含沙量较高，土壤侵蚀量是平整坡地的2~5倍。因此，在裸露陡坡耕地上，当降雨强度偏大时，采用农业耕作措施不仅不能降低土壤侵蚀发生，反而会增加。

Abstract

Tillage practices

which change the soil surface structure

lead to different soil erosion characteristics on the tilled surfaces compared to the smooth surface. The objective of this study was to analyze soil and water loss on the tilled surfaces in rainfall-erosion processes based on the simulated rainfall experiments. Experiment results would be used for evaluating the soil and water conservation benefit of the projects of return steep slope land to forestry. Tillage practices in this study included shallow hoeing (SH)

deep hoeing (DH) and contour ploughing (CP). A smooth surface (SS) was served as control measure. Rainfall intensities were 60

90 and 120 mm/h and rainfall duration was 80 min for three rainfall intensities. Results showed that: （1) On the tilled steep slope

three tillage practices delayed the beginning of surface runoff during the rainfall of 60 and 90 mm/h intensities

but no significant difference was found in surface runoff initiation time between SH and SS

and between DH and SS during the rainfall of 120 mm/h intensity; （2) The cumulative production flow of CP was lower than the SS under three rainfall intensities

but no obvious regularity in size of the cumulative production flow for SH and DH treatments compared with SS; （3) In rainfall of 120 mm/h intensity

the flow sediment concentration of slope with tillage practices was higher than SS

leading soil sediment from three tilled slopes was 2 ~ 5 times of SS. Therefore

on the tilled and bare steep slope

when the rainfall intensity is larger

the tillage practices not only fail to reduce soil erosion

instead will increase.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

1271

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effects of Erosive Rainfall on Soil Erosion Characteristics of Black Sloping Farmland

Effects of Slope Gradient on Soil and Water Conservation Benefit of Tillage Practices in Agricultural Lands

Small Watershed Erosion Model （SWEM）

Response of Soil Total Nitrogen Distribution to Erosion under Ecological Restoration in Qinling Water Source Area

Response of Slope Runoff Hydrodynamic Characteristics to Gravel Coverage in Alpine Regions under Artificial Rainfall Simulation

Related Author

DING Guihui

REN Zhongzheng

HU Wei

CHEN Yuan

ZHANG Xingyi

FU Suhua

LIU Baoyuan

Related Institution

School of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University

State Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shannxi

State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Disaster Risk Reduction， Faculty of Geographical Science， Beijing Normal University

Faculty of Arts and Sciences， Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai

⁰