Physiological Responses and Resistances of Ardisia crenata and A.mamillatato the Treatments of Cadmium Stress[J]. 2017, 31(5): 321-327.
DOI:
Physiological Responses and Resistances of Ardisia crenata and A.mamillatato the Treatments of Cadmium Stress[J]. 2017, 31(5): 321-327. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.05.050.
Physiological Responses and Resistances of Ardisia crenata and A.mamillatato the Treatments of Cadmium Stress
To clarify the physiological responses and compare the resistance intensities of two Ardisias pecies to the treatments of cadmium stress
hydroponic experiment was carried out with 2 years old seedlings of Ardisia crenata Sims. and Ardisia mamillata Hance. In the experiment
the cadmium concentrations were designed as 0
0.025
0.05
0.1
0.2
and 0.4 mmol/L. Several physiological indicators including plant height
superoxide dismutase (SOD)
peroxidase (POD)
and catalase (CAT) activities
proline (Pro)
content malondialdehvde (MDA) content
photosynthetic characteristics
and fluorescence characteristics were measured. The following results were obtained: (1) Plant height
SOD
POD
and CAT activities of A. crenata and A. mamillata first increased with the increase of incubation time
and then the first two indicators decreased significantly; (2) After 20 days treatment
the accumulation of Pro content in the two plant species was induced for low cadmium concentration treatment (T2)
especially significant for A. mamillata
which was up to 149.24%; (3) After 20 days treatment
MDA contents increased
with the highest increases of 169.07% and 122.70%
respectively; (4) An obvious increase of photosynthetic electron transfer efficiency (ETR) of A. mamillata was observed for low cadmium concentration treatment (T2)
while qP (photochemical quenching coefficient) had no significant change
indicating that A. crenata startes the energy dissipation pathways sufficiently to avoid the damage of photosynthetic mechanism; (5) Both ETR and qP of A. mamillata decreased significantly after treatment with high concentration of cadmium (T4)
indicating that PSII of A. mamillata has been hurt under the high concentrations of cadmium stress with the increasing of SOD and the damage of chloroplast structure; (6) ETR fluorescence parameters of A. crenata descended even in early stage of cadmium stress
and the decrease was much more significant in the later stage. After comprehensive analyses
it is supposed that both A. crenata and A. mamillata increase their antioxidant enzyme activities to resist stress for treatments with low cadmium concentrations
whereas high concentrations of cadmium destroye antioxidant enzyme and photosynthetical systems and thus decrease plant resistance. It is found that A. mamillata had higher resistance to cadmium than Ardisia crenata Sims
and has high potential for cultivation under the environment with high concentrations of cadmium.