Effect of Different Types Humic Acid Class on Erosion

WU Junhu1; ZHU Duanduan1; WANG Haiyang2; YANG Ting1; LIU Yewei3

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.01.005

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effect of Different Types Humic Acid Class on Erosion

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Effect of Different Types Humic Acid Class on Erosion
- Vol. 31, Issue 1, Pages: 24-29(2017)
- 作者机构：
  
  西安理工大学西北旱区生态水利工程国家重点实验室培育基地,西安,710048
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.01.005
  CLC： S157.2
- Published：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
WU Junhu1, ZHU Duanduan1, WANG Haiyang2, et al. Effect of Different Types Humic Acid Class on Erosion[J]. 2017, 31(1): 24-29.
DOI：

WU Junhu1, ZHU Duanduan1, WANG Haiyang2, et al. Effect of Different Types Humic Acid Class on Erosion[J]. 2017, 31(1): 24-29. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.01.005.

摘要

在陕西省长武县黄土高原农业生态试验站进行了在相同的上方来水量18 L/min条件下3种不同腐殖酸类（NHA、BFA、FA）的黄土坡面侵蚀和养分流失的试验，分析了不同腐殖酸类及不同量的同一腐殖酸对土壤侵蚀和养分流失的影响。结果表明：不同量的NHA处理下，径流量均随时间的增加而增加，NHA浓度150，300 g/㎡的坡面径流量是500g/㎡的坡面径流量的1.14，1.08倍，含沙率和Br-浓度均随时间的增加而减少，累积径流量、累积泥沙量、累积流失量均随用量的增加而减少，150，300g/㎡的坡面累积泥沙量是用量500g/㎡的2.16，1.87倍，累积Br-流失量是用量500g/㎡的1.38，1.23倍，用量500g/㎡HA对防止土壤侵蚀和养分流失的效果最佳；不同浓度FA处理下，径流量随时间的增加而增加，FA浓度为0.1，0.03%的累积径流量是浓度0.05%的1.19，1.33倍，含沙率和Br-浓度大体随时间的增加而减少，累积径流量、累积泥沙量、累积流失量均随浓度的增加先减少后增加，浓度0.1，0.03%的累积泥沙流失量是浓度0.05%的3.03，4.09倍，累积Br-流失总量是0.05%Br-流失总量的1.1，1.26倍，浓度0.5%FA对防止土壤侵蚀和养分流失的效果最佳；不同浓度BFA处理下，径流量随时间的增加而增加，BFA浓度0.1，0.05%的坡面累积径流量是浓度0.03%的1.15，1.1倍，含沙率和Br-浓度随时间的增加而减少，累积径流量、累积泥沙量随浓度的增加而增加，累积流失量随浓度的增加先减少后增加，浓度0.1，0.05%累积泥沙量是0.03%累积泥沙总量的1.36，0.49倍，Br-流失总量是0.05%Br-流失总量的4.06，3.5倍，浓度0.5%BFA对防止土壤侵蚀和养分流失的效果最佳；综合考虑3种不同腐殖酸类防止坡面侵蚀和养分流失效果BFA＞FA＞NHA。

Abstract

Under the conditions of three different types humic acid on erosion and nutrient loss on loess slope experiment above the same amount of 18 L/min in the Chinese academy of sciences agricultural ecological experimental station of the loess plateau

analyzed the impact of different types humic acid (NHA

FA and BFA) and humic acid in different amount on soil erosion and nutrient loss. Results showed that the different amount of NHA treatment

runoff increased with time. Compared with the slope runoff of 500 g/㎡

NHA content of 150 g/㎡ and 300 g/㎡was 1.14 times

1.08 times respectively. Sand content and concentration of Br- both decreased with the increase of time

cumulative runoff

sediment accumulation

the cumulative loss both decreased with the increase of dosage

slope cumulative runoff of 150 g/㎡

300 g/㎡was 2.16 times

1.87 times as much as 500 g/㎡

Br- cumulative loss was 1.38 times

1.23 times as much as 500 g/㎡. Dosage of 500 g/㎡ NHA to prevent soil erosion and nutrient loss was the best. Under different concentrations of FA

runoff increased with time

the cumulative runoff of concentration of 0.1%，0.03% was 1.19 times，1.33 times of 0.05% concentration

Br- concentration and rate of sand containing substantially reduced with increasing time

cumulative runoff

accumulated sediment and cumulative loss decreased firstly and then increased with increasing concentration

the sediment loss of the concentration of 0.1%

0.03% was 3.03 times

4.09 times as much as 0.05%

cumulative Br- loss was 1.1 times，1.26 times to the total loss of 0.05%Br-

and the effect of 0.5% FA concentration on soil erosion and nutrient loss was the best. Under different concentrations of BFA

runoff increased with time

slope cumulative runoff of BFA concentration of 0.1%

0.05% was 1.15 times

1.1times as much as 0.03%

sandy rate and Br- concentration decreased with increasing time. Cumulative runoff

sediment accumulation increased with the increase of the concentration

?however

cumulative runoff increased firstly and then decreased with the increase of concentration

the cumulative sediment of concentration of 0.1%

0.05% was 1.36 times

0.49 times as much as 0.03%. The total loss of 0.01%Br- and 0.03% Br-was 4.06 times

3.5 times as much as 0.05%Br-

and the effect of 0.5% BFA concentration on soil erosion and nutrient loss was the best. Comprehensive consideration of the effect of three different types of humic acid to prevent erosion and nutrient loss on the slope was BFA>FA>NHA.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

1276

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effects of Straw Incorporation Methods on Runoff， Sediment， Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses in Purple Soil Sloping Land of Southern Sichuan

Effects of Biochar Combined with Nitrification/Urease Inhibitor and Straw Mulching on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Leaching in Red Soil Tea Plantations

Effects of Interplanting Medicinal Herbs on Runoff, Sediment and Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses in Young Oil Tea Plantation on Red Soil Sloping Field

Effects of Tillage Practices on Erosion and Winter Wheat Yield on Sloping Dryland

Research on Nutrient Loss from Loessial Soil under Different Slope

Related Author

ZENG Xiewei

LI Renyu

DING Weifeng

HU Bangyou

HU Huaizhou

LI Tianyang

HE Binghui

LIAO Qiyuan

Related Institution

Yibin Natural No-tillage Research Institute

College of Resources and Environment， Southwest University

Yibin Academy of Southwest University

Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region， Institute of Subtropical Agriculture， Chinese Academy of Sciences

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation，State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources， College of Forestry， Guangxi University

⁰