Control Model of Soil Erosion in Zuli River Basin Using GIS Method

JIAO Jinyu1; GUI Lide2

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2016.05.016

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Control Model of Soil Erosion in Zuli River Basin Using GIS Method

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Control Model of Soil Erosion in Zuli River Basin Using GIS Method
- Vol. 30, Issue 5, Pages: 95-101(2016)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 1．定西师范高等专科学校地理系,甘肃,定西,743000
  2. 2．定西市水土保持科学研究所,甘肃,定西,743000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2016.05.016
  CLC： S157.1
- Published：2016
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
JIAO Jinyu1, GUI Lide2. Control Model of Soil Erosion in Zuli River Basin Using GIS Method[J]. 2016, 30(5): 95-101.
DOI：

JIAO Jinyu1, GUI Lide2. Control Model of Soil Erosion in Zuli River Basin Using GIS Method[J]. 2016, 30(5): 95-101. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2016.05.016.

摘要

借助RS图像信息提取技术，对祖厉河流域遥感影像进行校正与信息提取。利用GIS栅格数据空间分析功能，将研究区空间化为30 m×30 m的栅格单元。根据土壤流失方程RUSLE生成各因子栅格图，借助GIS空间分析功能，实现该区土壤侵蚀评估模拟。结果表明：祖厉河流域1995年、2005年、2015年土壤侵蚀模数分别为2 877，3 372，3 713 t/(km2·a）；从侵蚀量变化来看，1995年总土壤流失总量为29 608 397 t/a，2005年总土壤流失总量为34 694 588 t/a，2015年总土壤流失总量为38 202 817 t/a，年平均流失模数为3 713 t/(km2·a）。从土壤侵蚀空间分布和侵蚀量变化来看，研究区土壤侵蚀度呈现南北低、中部高；河流深切区低，高山林立区高的特点。针对研究区，提出4种模拟治理并进行验证，分析得出完全采取人工提升林区植被增长速度，主要包括全力发展坡地退耕还林还草的高效治理模式是该区最佳治理模式，可有效改善土壤流失状况，使平均土壤流失模数降为2 656 t/(km2·a）。

Abstract

This study used quantitative remote sensing method

in combination with RUSLE model

and GIS software

utilizing a series of data such as digital elevation model (DEM)

rainfall and soil properties

the characteristics of spatial-temporal differentiation of soil erosion of Zuli river basin from 1995 to 2015 was estimated. By analysis of the temporal variation of the erosion modulus

temporal variation of erosion intensity and spatial pattern of erosion intensity

the results of this research were summed as follows: The erosion modulus was 2 877.87 t/(km2·a）in 1995

3 372.24 t/(km2·a） in 2005

and 3 713.23 t/(km2·a） in 2015

respectively

suggesting the increasing erosion rates. In the case of the spatial pattern of soil erosion

the erosion modulus was high value on the high side place in the middle of the study area and low value in the south and north. Besides

the soil erosion mounts was high on the side in the mountains and low near the river valley. Four types of simulation were proposed according to the characteristics of study area. The results showed that the efficient governance model (EGM) was the best governance model area

which could effectively control soil loss

the average modulus properties was 2 656. t/(km2·a）.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

2048

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Spatiotemporal Variability of Soil Erosion in Yangling District Based on GIS and RS

Synergistic Evolution and Interaction of Soil Erosion and Rocky Desertification in Karst Area

Quantitative Attribution Analysis of Driving Factors of Soil Erosion in Xiaolangdi Reservoir Area of the Yellow River

Sensitivity Assessment of Soil Erosion and Its Spatial Pattern Evolution in Dianchi Lake Basin Based on GIS and RUSLE

Sensitivity Analysis of Gravity Erosion to Topography Factors on the Loess Plateau, China

Related Author

ZHANG Yang'an

ZHANG Xin

JIANG Shirong

HE Maolin

ZHANG Yushan

GAO Jiayong

WU Qinglin

LI Rui

Related Institution

Yangling Vocational and Technical College, Yangling

Northwest A & F University, Yangling

Guizhou Normal University, School of Karst Science

State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control

College of Forestry, Guizhou University

⁰