Water and Nitrogen Utilization and Apparent Budget of Soil Nitrogen under Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Different Application Rates in Summer Maize

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Water and Nitrogen Utilization and Apparent Budget of Soil Nitrogen under Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Different Application Rates in Summer Maize

更新时间：2024-11-07

- Water and Nitrogen Utilization and Apparent Budget of Soil Nitrogen under Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Different Application Rates in Summer Maize
- Issue 1, Pages: 63-67(2006)
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC：
- Published：2006
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Water and Nitrogen Utilization and Apparent Budget of Soil Nitrogen under Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Different Application Rates in Summer Maize[J]. 2006, (1): 63-67.
DOI：

Water and Nitrogen Utilization and Apparent Budget of Soil Nitrogen under Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Different Application Rates in Summer Maize[J]. 2006, (1): 63-67. DOI：

摘要

以两个夏播玉米品种为材料，研究了不同类型氮肥与不同施氮量下华北平原夏玉米的水分与氮素利用及土壤氮素表观盈亏．结果表明：（1）随施氮量增大．产量、耗水量及水分生产效率（WPE）增大，氮肥利用率（NUE）降低；（2）夏玉米WPE与NUE具有较明显的基因型差异。WPE郑单958较大。NUE农大108较大；（3）wPE与NUE均受到氮肥类型的影响．WPE郑单958复合肥〉普通尿素〉包膜尿素．农大108处理间差异较小，以复合肥略大，普通尿素和包膜尿素相当。与普通尿素相比，包膜尿素与复合肥利用率较高，郑单958施N90kg／hm^2与农大108施N180kg／hm^2时，两者对NUE的提高尤为明显；（4）本试验条件下，经过夏玉米生长季，两品种各处理均出现土壤氮素表观亏缺，亏缺量随施氮量增大而降低，各条件下郑单958亏缺量较农大108大；氮肥类型间土壤氮素表观亏缺量表现为复合肥〉包膜尿素〉普通尿素。

Abstract

Two summer maize cultivars

Zhengdan958 and Nongda108

were used

and the effect of different types of nitrogen fertilizer(NF) and different application rates on water and nitrogen utilization and apparent budget of soil nitrogen were studied.The main results are as follows:(1)With the increment of N application rate

yield

water use amount and water produce efficiency(WPE) increased but nitrogen use efficiency(NUE) decreased.(2)There existed obvious genotype difference in WPE and NUE in summer maize.WPE of Zhengdan958 was bigger than that of Nongda108

and NUE of Nongda108 was bigger.(3)WPE and NUE were affected by type of NF.As for WPE of Zhengdan958

compound fertilizer>common urea>coated urea

but the difference among treatments of Nongda108 was smaller

that of compound fertilizer was bigger and that of the other two type of NF was equal nearly.Compared with common urea

NUE of coated urea and compound fertilizer was bigger

especially when 90 kg N/hm~2 for Zhengdan958 and 180 kg N/hm~2 for Nongda108.(4)After summer maize season

all treatments of two cultivars showed soil N deficit(SND) and the amount of SND decreased with the increment of N application rate.In common

amount of SND of Zhengdan958 was bigger than that of Nongda108.The amount of soil N apparent deficit of three type NF showed compound fertilizer>coated urea>common urea.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Water and Nitrogen Utilization and Apparent Budget of Soil Nitrogen under Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Different Application Rates in Summer Maize

Effect of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Physiological and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Summer Maize and Its Optimized Combination of Agronomic Techniques

Effects of Deep Storage Irrigation on Soil Moisture Dynamics of Summer Maize Farmland

Effect of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Physiological and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Summer Maize and Its Optimized Combination of Agronomic Techniques

Grain Yield and Soil Water Content of Super-high-yield Summer Maize Under Straw Mulching

Related Author

YI Zhen-xie

WANG Pu

LIU Ming

WEI Feng-tong

魏凤桐

WEI Feng-tong

Lü Li-hua

LIU Ming

Related Institution

Hydrological and Water Resources Survey Centre of Shaanxi, Xian

Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling

WANG Hui,LIU Quan-ru,ZHANG Sheng-yong,SHEN Jia-yin,ZHAO Dan-dan,YU Jing-ping,LI Quan-qi(Water Conservancy Civil Engineering Institute,Shandong Agricultural University,Taian,)

College of Resources and Environment Science, Hebei Agricultural University

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources,Yangling

⁰