网络首发:2022-05-27,
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
影响及其空间差异杨亚楠, 刘均阳, 王佩佩, 等. 黄土高原典型植被群落对土壤表面电化学性质的[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):345-351.
YANG Yanan, LIU Junyang, WANG Peipei, et al. Effects of Typical Vegetation Communities on Soil Surface Electrochemical Properties and Their Spatial Difference on the Loess Plateau[J]. 2022, 36(3): 345-351.
影响及其空间差异杨亚楠, 刘均阳, 王佩佩, 等. 黄土高原典型植被群落对土壤表面电化学性质的[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):345-351. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.049.
YANG Yanan, LIU Junyang, WANG Peipei, et al. Effects of Typical Vegetation Communities on Soil Surface Electrochemical Properties and Their Spatial Difference on the Loess Plateau[J]. 2022, 36(3): 345-351. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.049.
为探究黄土高原不同区域典型植被生长对土壤表面电化学性质的影响
以黄土高原自南向北的3个典型区域(永寿墚、坊塌、六道沟)及2种典型乡土草本植物(铁杆蒿(Artemisia gmelinii Web.)、长芒草(Stipa bungeanaTrin.))为研究对象
以退耕1年的撂荒地作为对照
通过土壤样品采集和土壤表面电化学性质的测定
研究典型植被群落对土壤表面电化学性质的影响及其空间差异。结果表明:(1)在黄土高原地区
相较于撂荒地
典型植被群落生长使土壤黏粒、粉粒、有机质含量增加
土壤pH、容重、砂粒含量减少;(2)同一区域内
相较于撂荒地
植被恢复促进了土壤阳离子交换量、比表面积的增加
减少了表面电荷密度和表面电场强度
其变化范围分别为6.69~24.34 cmol/kg
[JP]7.29~182.29 m2/g
0.08~2.04 C/m2
1.23~28.46 108 V/m;不同区域间
同一植被群落下永寿墚土壤阳离子交换量、比表面积的增量最高
而六道沟土壤表面电化学性质的变化率最高
说明典型植被群落对土壤表面电化学性质的影响具有空间差异性;(3)典型植物群落下土壤粉粒含量和有机质含量与土壤表面电化学性质具有显著的相关性
其变化是影响黄土高原地区土壤电化学性质变化的主要原因
解释率分别为61.0%
11.1%。研究结果为认识黄土高原地区植被恢复及其调控作用提供参考。
In order to investigate the influence of typical vegetation growth to the soil surface electrochemical properties of soil surface in different regions of loess Plateau
Taking three typical regions from south to north on the Loess Plateau (Yongshouliang
Fangta
Liudaogou) and two typical herbaceous plants (Artemisia gmelinii Web.
Stipa bungeana Trin.) as research objects
and the abandoned land for one year as the control
the effect of two typical herbaceous plants on soil surface electrochemical properties and their spatial difference were analyzed based on collecting soil samples and measuring the soil surface electrochemical properties. The results showed that:(1) On the Loess Plateau
compared with the abandoned land
the growth of typical vegetation communities increased the contents of clay
silt and organic matter in soil
while decreased the content of pH
bulk density and sand. (2) In the same region
Soil cation exchange capacity and specific surface area increased and surface charge density and surface electric field intensity decreased with vegetation restoration
varying in the range of 6.69~24.34 cmol/kg
7.29~182.29 m2/g
0.08~2.04 C/m2
1.23~28.46 108V/m. In different regions
with the influence of the same plant species
soil cation exchange capacity and specific surface area increased the most in Yongshouliang
and the rates of soil surface electrochemical properties change were the greatest in Liu daogou. It indicated that the influence of typical herbaceous plants on soil surface electrochemical properties has spatial heterogeneity
which may be attributed to the climate
soil texture
and other factors. (3) Silt content and organic matter content were the main contributors to soil surface electrochemical properties on the Loess Plateau due to their significant correlation and the change was the main reason for the change of soil electrochemical properties on the Loess Plateau
explaining 61.0% and 11.1% of the changes
respectively.
李小雁.干旱地区土壤-植被-水文耦合、响应与适应机制[J].中国科学:地球科学,2011,41(12):1721-1730.
Hu F N, Liu J F, Xu C Y, et al. Soil internal forces initiate aggregate breakdown and splash erosion[J].Geoderma,2018,320:43-51.
Yu Z H, Li H, Liu X M, et al. Influence of soil electric field on water movement in soil[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2016,155:263-270.
Li H, Hou J, Liu X M, et al. Combined determination of specific surface area and surface charge properties of charged particles from a single experiment[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2011,75(6):2128-2135.
Liu J F, Wang Z L, Hu F N, et al. Soil organic matter and silt contents determine soil particle surface electrochemical properties across a long-term natural restoration grassland[J].Catena,2020,190:e104526.
陈晶晶.基于表面电场驱动土壤侵蚀理论下的植物篱措施水力侵蚀控制过程研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2014.
刘均阳,周正朝,苏雪萌.植物根系对土壤团聚体形成作用机制研究回顾[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):267-273,298.
Deng L, Liu G B, Shangguan Z P. Land-use conversion and changing soil carbon stocks in China's Grain-for-Green Program:A synthesis[J].Global Change Biology,2014,20(11):3544-3556.
于天仁.土壤的电化学性质及其研究法[M].北京:科学出版社,1976.
Fu B J, Liu Y, Lü Y H, et al. Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Ecological Complexity,2011,8(4):284-293.
李玉进,胡澍,焦菊英,等.黄土丘陵区不同侵蚀环境下土壤有机碳对植被恢复的响应[J].生态学报,2017,37(12):4100-4107.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
马任甜,胡斐南,刘婧芳,等.黄土高原植被恢复过程中土壤表面电化学性质演变特征[J].土壤学报,2020,57(2):392-402.
Wang H, Zhang G H, Li N N, et al. Soil erodibility influenced by natural restoration time of abandoned farmland on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Geoderma,2018,325:18-27.
Ghafoor A, Poeplau C, Kätterer T. Fate of straw-and root-derived carbon in a Swedish agricultural soil[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2017,53(2):257-267.
龚燕.土壤电场与机械组成耦合作用下的土壤水入渗[D].重庆:西南大学,2018.
黄学茹,李航,李嵩,等.土壤电场与有机大分子的耦合对土壤团聚体稳定性的影响[J].土壤学报,2013,50(4):734-742.
Deng L, Shangguan Z P. Afforestation drives soil carbon and nitrogen changes in China[J].Land Degradation and Development,2016,28:151-165.
杨宁,邹冬生,杨满元,等.衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地不同恢复阶段植被特征与土壤性质的关系[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(1):90-96.
余正洪,刘新敏,李航.红壤黄壤及紫色土表面电荷性质的研究[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013,38(3):62-66.
李俊超,郭胜利,党廷辉,等.黄土丘陵区不同退耕方式土壤有机碳密度的差异及其空间变化[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(6):1167-1173.
吕渡,杨亚辉,赵文慧,等.不同恢复类型植被细根分布及与土壤理化性质的耦合关系[J].生态学报,2018,38(11):3979-3987.
孙龙,张光辉,栾莉莉,等.黄土丘陵区表层土壤有机碳沿降水梯度的分布[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(2):532-538.
葛楠楠,石芸,杨宪龙,等.黄土高原不同土壤质地农田土壤碳、氮、磷及团聚体分布特征[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(5):1626-1632.
高宇,樊军,彭小平,等.水蚀风蚀交错区典型植被土壤水分消耗和补充深度对比研究[J].生态学报,2014,34(23):7038-7046.
0
浏览量
957
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621