1. 湖南农业大学资源与环境学院,长沙,410128
2. 湖南省土壤肥料研究所,长沙,410125
[ "赵杭(1998-),女,汉族,四川广元人,硕士研究生,主要从事农业面源污染防控与农业环境生态研究。E-mail:zh3245643@163.com" ]
网络首发:2022-05-27,
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
赵杭, 周旋, 王艺哲, 等. 芦荻生物质炭基肥研制及其对水稻土氮损失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):319-326.
ZHAO Hang, ZHOU Xuan, WANG Yizhe, et al. Effects of Biochar Fertilizers Prepared by Reeds with Different Techniques on Nitrogen Loss in Paddy Soil[J]. 2022, 36(3): 319-326.
赵杭, 周旋, 王艺哲, 等. 芦荻生物质炭基肥研制及其对水稻土氮损失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):319-326. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.045.
ZHAO Hang, ZHOU Xuan, WANG Yizhe, et al. Effects of Biochar Fertilizers Prepared by Reeds with Different Techniques on Nitrogen Loss in Paddy Soil[J]. 2022, 36(3): 319-326. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.045.
为实现秸秆资源化利用和强化生物质炭基肥生产应用
以洞庭湖芦荻秸秆热解生物质炭为基质
采用包膜和混合造粒技术
以改性淀粉为黏合剂
辅以膨润土、腐殖酸等材料制备包膜炭基肥(CT)和混合炭基肥(MT)。以生物质炭占比10%(T1)
15%(T2)
20%(T3)
25%(T4)和30%(T5)
从微观形态结构、养分释放速率、粒径及抗压强度等基本性质进行择优筛选
将筛选后的炭基肥处理(CT2、CT3、CT4和MT1、MT2、MT3)与普通复合肥(NPK)、不施肥(CK)共8个处理进行室内水稻盆栽试验
对比不同研制方式及生物质炭添加量下水稻土氨挥发及氮素渗漏流失差异。结果表明:炭肥比越大
肥料结构愈紧密
累积氮素释放率愈低
但过量的生物质炭的添加会造成肥料粒径不均匀、抗压强度不达标。包膜生物质炭基肥以15%~25%的生物质炭添加量较适宜;混合生物质炭基肥以10%~20%的生物质炭添加量较适宜。与NPK处理相比
CT2、CT3、CT4处理氨累积挥发量分别降低12.95%
27.96%
23.82%
氨挥发损失率分别降低16.56%
35.67%
30.57%
以CT3效果最好;MT1、MT2、MT3处理氨累积挥发量分别降低33.72%
41.48%
16.06%
氨挥发损失率分别降低43.31%
53.18%
20.38%
以MT2效果最好。2种炭基肥均可减少盆面水铵氮平均浓度
与NPK处理相比
最高降幅分别达20.74%(CT4)和39.90%(MT2);混合造粒炭基肥中以MT2处理的全氮、硝氮浓度降幅最大
分别达5.50%
5.09%
而包膜炭基肥各处理间差异均不显著。与NPK处理相比
施包膜炭基肥处理的渗漏水中铵氮与全氮平均浓度分别显著降低8.93%~14.00%
8.84%~16.38%
而各处理间硝氮平均浓度均无显著性差异。施混合炭基肥可降低铵氮、硝氮和全氮平均浓度
分别达11.16%~12.42%
3.22%~22.29%
11.14%~15.86%。此外
炭肥比越高
生物质炭的氮减排效应越明显
但添加量过大其氮减排量并无显著性增加。总体而言
2种工艺制备生物质炭基肥均能有效降低氨挥发损失以及减缓氮素径流渗漏损失风险。其中
包膜炭基肥以20%~25%生物炭添加量效果最优
混合炭基肥以15%最优。
For the dual purposes of the straw resource utilization and strengthening the biomass carbon basal application
the rushes straw in the Dongting Lake was pyrolysised as biomass substrate. Using the coated and mix granulation technologies
the coated (CT) and mixed (MT) biochar fertilizers were prepared
with modified starch as adhesive
and bentonite
humic acid as supplementary. The ratios of biochar in fertilizers were 10% (T1)
15% (T2)
20% (T3)
25% (T4) and 30% (T5) respectively. All the fertilizers were screened considering the microstructure
nutrient release rate
particle size and compressive strength and other basic properties. A pot experiment was carried out with the screened biochar fertilizers (CT2
CT3
CT4 and MT1
MT2 and MT3)
taking common compound fertilizer (NPK) and no fertilizer as the control (CK). The differences of ammonia volatilization and nitrogen leaching and loss in paddy soil were analyzed. The results showed that the larger ratio of biochar resulted in the compacted fertilizer structure and the lower cumulative nitrogen release rate. However
the excessive addition of biochar would cause the uneven particle size and non-standard compressive strength of fertilizer. For CT
15%~25% biochar was suitable. For MT
10%~20% biochar was suitable. Compared with NPK
CT2
CT3 and CT4 reduced ammonia volatilization accumulation by 12.95%
27.96% and 23.82%
and ammonia volatilization loss rate by 16.56%
35.67% and 30.57%
respectively
among which CT3 had the best effect. The cumulative amount of ammonia volatilization was reduced by 33.72%
41.48% and 16.06% respectively in MT1
MT2 and MT3
and the loss of ammonia volatilization was reduced by 43.31%
53.18% and 20.38% respectively. The average concentration of ammonium and nitrogen in surface water decreased by 20.74% (CT4) and 39.90% (MT2)
respectively
compared with NPK. Total nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen concentration of MT decreased by 5.50% and 5.09% respectively in MT2
while the difference of CT was not significant. Compared with NPK
CT significantly reduced the average concentration of ammonium nitrogen and total nitrogen by 8.93%~14.00% and 8.84%~16.38%
respectively
while there was no significant difference in nitrate nitrogen treatments. The average concentrations of ammonium nitrogen
nitrate nitrogen and total nitrogen were reduced by 11.16%~12.42%
3.22%~22.29% and 11.14%~15.86%
respectively. The higher the ratio of biochar was
the more obvious the emission reduction of biochar was. But the effect was not obvious when the excessive biochar was added. In general
the two methods could effectively reduce the loss of ammonia volatilization and reduce the loss risk of nitrogen. Among them
the CT with 20%~25% biochar content was the best
and the MT with 15% was the best.
张继宁,周胜,陈桂发,等.基于文献统计的农业领域生物炭研究现状[J].环境科学与技术,2015,38(增刊2):240-245,250.
王志鹏,陈蕾.秸秆生物炭的研究进展[J].应用化工,2019,48(2):444-447.
张祥,王典,姜存仓,等.生物炭对我国南方红壤和黄棕壤理化性质的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(8):979-984.
卢广远,张艳,王祥福,等.炭基肥料种类对土壤物理性质及玉米产量的影响[J].河北农业科学,2011,15(5):50-53.
刘善良,常春丽,蒲加军,等.生物炭基肥料在水稻上的应用效果研究[J].现代农业科技,2019(15):5-6.
黄劭理,徐茂华.生物炭基有机肥的优势及其在广西烤烟上的应用探析[J].现代农业科技,2020(14):41-42.
钱湘群,陈腾蛟,盛奎川,等.玉米/木薯淀粉基竹炭成型燃料的品质特性[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(增刊1):157-161.
国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
彭春辉,任奕林,李宝军.生物炭基肥挤压成型工艺参数优化[J].中国农业科技导报,2019,21(5):74-84.
吕娟,任永志,王明峰,等.淀粉胶生物质炭基氮肥制备及其缓释特性分析[J].农机化研究,2019,41(6):175-180.
Qiao D L, Liu H S, Yu L, et al. Preparation and characterization of slow-release fertilizer encapsulated by starch-based superabsorbent polymer[J].Carbohydrate Polymers,2016,147:146-154.
陈剑秋.几种新型缓控释肥工艺及养分释放特征研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2012.
牛智有,刘鸣,牛文娟,等.炭肥比和膨润土粘结剂对炭基肥颗粒理化及缓释特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(2):219-227.
蒋恩臣,张伟,秦丽元.粒状生物质炭基尿素肥料制备及其性能研究[J].东北农业大学学报,2014,45(11):89-94.
González M, Cea M, Medina J, et al. Evaluation of biodegradable polymers as encapsulating agents for the development of a urea controlled-release fertilizer using biochar as support material[J].Science of the Total Environment,2015,505:446-453.
Spokas K A, Novak J M, Venterea R T. Biochar's role as an alternative N-fertilizer:Ammonia capture[J].Plant and Soil,2012,350(1/2):35-42.
Chen C R, Phillips I R, Condron L M, et al. Impacts of greenwaste biochar on ammonia volatilisation from bauxite processing residue sand[J].Plant and Soil,2013,367(1/2):301-312.
L.) and nitrogen and phosphorus losses[J].Industrial Crops and Products,2019,131:96-105.
王思源,宁建凤,王荣辉,等.黏土矿物混合生物炭包膜尿素的制备及其氮素污染减排潜力[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(5):151-157.
周旻旻.水稻秸秆生物质炭基缓释肥的制备与应用研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2013.
郑小龙,吴家森,陈裴裴,等.不同施肥与生物质炭配施对水稻田面水氮磷流失及产量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):39-43.
Manolikaki I, Mangolis A, Diamadopoulos E. The impact of biochars prepared from agricultural residues on phosphorus release and availiability in two fertile soils[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2016,181:536-543.
Mandal S, Thangarajan R, Bolan N S, et al. Biochar-inducedconcomitant decrease in ammonia volatilization and increase in nitrogen use efficiency by wheat[J].Chemosphere,2016,142:120-127.
Qin J H, Niu A Y, Li Q W et al. Effect of soluble calcium on enhancing nitrate retention by biochar[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2020,274:e111133.
Puga A P, Grutzmacher P, Pellegrino Cerri C E, et al. Biochar-based nitrogen fertilizers:Greenhouse gas emissions, use efficiency, and maize yield in tropical soils[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,704:e135375.
付嘉英,乔志刚,郑金伟,等.不同炭基肥料对小白菜硝酸盐含量、产量及品质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(34):162-165.
张伟.水稻秸秆炭基缓释肥的制备及性能研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2014.
0
浏览量
750
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621