炭基肥添加对蜜柚果园酸性土壤pH和交换性能的影响

赵琳; 刘桂珍; 钱笑杰; 郭豪; 方熊; 王飞; 李清华; 易志刚

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.035

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

炭基肥添加对蜜柚果园酸性土壤pH和交换性能的影响

更新时间：2026-04-09

- 炭基肥添加对蜜柚果园酸性土壤pH和交换性能的影响
- Effects of Biochar-based Fertilizer on pH and Exchange Capacity of Acidic Soil in Pomelo Orchard
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第3期页码：244-251
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 福建农林大学机电工程学院,福州,350002
  2. 福建省农业科学院土壤肥料研究所,福州,350013
  3. 福建农林大学资源与环境学院,福州,350002
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "赵琳(1997-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事农业生物环境与能源研究。E-mail:zhaolin_97@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  5511协同创新工程项目(XTCXGC2021009);福建省属公益项目(2018R1022-1);福建省农科院科技创新团队项目(CXTD2021015-1)[JP]
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.035
  中图分类号： S156.6
- 网络首发：2022-05-27，
  
  纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
赵琳, 刘桂珍, 钱笑杰, 等. 炭基肥添加对蜜柚果园酸性土壤pH和交换性能的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):244-251.

ZHAO Lin, LIU Guizhen, QIAN Xiaojie, et al. Effects of Biochar-based Fertilizer on pH and Exchange Capacity of Acidic Soil in Pomelo Orchard[J]. 2022, 36(3): 244-251.
赵琳, 刘桂珍, 钱笑杰, 等. 炭基肥添加对蜜柚果园酸性土壤pH和交换性能的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):244-251. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.035.

ZHAO Lin, LIU Guizhen, QIAN Xiaojie, et al. Effects of Biochar-based Fertilizer on pH and Exchange Capacity of Acidic Soil in Pomelo Orchard[J]. 2022, 36(3): 244-251. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.035.

摘要

为研究炭基肥添加对蜜柚果园酸性土壤pH和交换性能的影响

设不添加肥料空白(CK)、只添加尿素(N)、水稻秸秆炭基肥(rice straw biochar-based fertilizer

BR)和竹屑炭基肥(bamboo biochar-based fertilizer

BB)各4个用量梯度(2.5

20 g/kg)且配施尿素处理

开展60天室内培养试验。结果表明:随着培养进行

BR和BB处理土壤pH均先升高后降低

交换性酸和交换性盐基离子含量呈上升趋势。培养60天时

随着BR和BB施用量增加

对提升土壤pH、CEC及盐基饱和度

降低交换性酸、交换性铝等效果越明显

且BR效果优于BB。与N处理相比

BR和BB使土壤pH分别提升0.24~3.43和0.21~3.40个单位

交换性酸分别降低45.55%~97.25%和34.01%~96.70%

[JP]交换性铝分别降低46.95%~99.75%和38.99%~99.00%

CEC分别提升7.02%~170.74%和6.52%~134.90%

盐基饱和度分别增加29.40%~51.61%和32.08%~53.90%。施用炭基肥可以提高蜜柚果园酸性土壤pH

减少土壤交换性酸

大幅度降低交换性铝含量

同时提升土壤CEC和盐基饱和度。蜜柚果园土壤酸化治理炭基肥适宜用量为2.5~5.0 g/kg

水稻秸秆炭基肥效果优于竹屑炭基肥。研究结果为蜜柚果园酸化土壤治理提供科学依据。

Abstract

This experiment explored the effects of the application of biochar-based fertilizer on the pH and exchange capacity of the acidic soil in pomelo orchard

and the laboratory culture experiments were conducted for 60 days. In the experiment

no fertilizer control (CK)

single application of urea (N)

rice straw biochar-based fertilizer (BR) and bamboo biochar-based fertilizer (BB) at four dosage gradients (2.5

10 and 20 g/kg) were set up

and urea was applied in all treatments. The results showed that with the development of culture experiment

the soil pH value of BR and BB increased first and then decreased

and the contents of exchangeable acid and base ions increased. After 60 days of culture

the improving effects of BR and BB on soil pH

exchangeable acid

exchangeable aluminum

CEC and base saturation became more obvious with the increasing of the dosage of BR and BB

and the effect of BR was better than that of BB. Compared with N treatment

in the BR and BB treatments

the soil pH increased by 0.24~3.43 and 0.21~3.40 units

the exchangeable acid decreased by 45.55%~97.25% and 34.01%~96.70%

the exchangeable aluminum decreased by 46.95%~99.75% and 38.99%~99.00%

the soil CEC increased by 7.02%~170.74% and 6.52%~134.90%

the base saturation increased by 29.40%~51.61% and 32.08%~53.90%

respectively. The application of biochar-based fertilizer could improve the pH of acidic soil

reduce exchangeable acid

greatly reduce exchangeable aluminum

and improve soil CEC and base saturation. Therefore

the optimum amount of biochar-based fertilizer for the acid soil of pomelo orchard was about 2.5~5.0 g/kg

and the effect of rice straw biochar-based fertilizer was better than bamboo biochar-based fertilizer. This experiment provided a scientific basis for the treatment of the acidified soil in pomelo orchard.

关键词

Keywords

references

Wang H, Xu R K, Wang N, et al. Soil acidification of Alfisols as influenced by tea cultivation in eastern China[J].Pedosphere,2010,20(6):799-806.

徐仁扣,李九玉,周世伟,等.我国农田土壤酸化调控的科学问题与技术措施[J].中国科学院院刊,2018,33(2):160-167.

李歆博,林伟杰,李湘君,等.琯溪蜜柚园土壤酸化特征研究[J].经济林研究,2020,38(1):169-176.

Shetty R, Vidya C S, Nagabovanalli P, et al. Aluminum toxicity in plants and its possible mitigation in acid soils by biochar:A review[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,756:e142744.

赵娟,杨耐德,周亮.牡蛎壳资源开发利用综述[J].安徽农学通报,2015,21(21):79-80.

武际,郭熙盛,王文军,等.施用白云石粉对黄红壤酸度和油菜产量的影响[J].中国油料作物学报,2006,28(1):55-58.

田冬,高明,黄容,等.油菜/玉米轮作农田土壤呼吸和异养呼吸对秸秆与生物炭还田的响应[J].环境科学,2017,38(7):2988-2999.

Miheretu B. Soil acid management using biochar:Review[J].Industrial Engineering and Management,2021,10(5):1-6.

赵秋芳,赵青云,王辉,等.生物炭改良土壤机理及其在我国热区应用前景综述[J].热带农业科学,2014,34(10):57-66.

索龙,潘凤娥,胡俊鹏,等.秸秆及生物质炭对砖红壤酸度及交换性能的影响[J].土壤,2015,47(6):1157-1162.

李昌娟,杨文浩,周碧青,等.生物炭基肥对酸化茶园土壤养分及茶叶产质量的影响[J].土壤通报,2021,52(2):387-397.

Jiang S J, Duan L X, Dai G L, et al. Immobilization of heavy metal (loid) s in acid paddy soil by soil replacement-biochar amendment technology under normal wet condition[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2021,28(48):68886-68896.

Prasetyo T B, Naspendra Z, Maulana A, et al. Potential of biochar bamboo and sub-bituminous coal as amendment of acid mineral soils for improving the growth of arabica coffee seedlings[J].IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science,2021,741(1):658-669.

Jia M Y, Yu J P, Li Z, et al. Effects of biochar on the migration and transformation of metal species in a highly acid soil contaminated with multiple metals and leached with solutions of different pH[J].Chemosphere,2021,278:372-383.

Yan P, Shen C, Zou Z H, et al. Biochar stimulates tea growth by improving nutrients in acidic soil[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2021,283:234-246.

喻成龙,汤建,郑琴,等.紫云英翻压条件下生物炭基肥配施量对水稻Cd迁移累积的影响[J].2020,39(11):2554-2560.

Wya B, Cla B, Swa B, et al. Influence of biochar and biochar-based fertilizer on yield, quality of tea and microbial community in an acid tea orchard soil[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2021,166:e104005.

罗煜,赵立欣,孟海波,等.不同温度下热裂解芒草生物质炭的理化特征分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(13):208-217.

Keiluweit M, Nico P S, Johnson M G, et al. Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar)[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2010,44(4):1247-1253.

鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M]北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.

李昂,王旭,范洪黎.4种土壤调理剂改良红壤铝毒害的效果研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2014(4):7-11.

Chintala R, Schumacher T E, Mcdonald L M, et al. Phosphorus sorption and availability from biochars and soil/biochar mixtures[J].Clean-Soil,Air,Water,2014,42(5):626-634.

Yuan J H, Xu R K, Wang N, et al. Amendment of acid soils with crop residues and biochars[J].Pedosphere,2011,21(3):302-308.

Li J Y, Wang N, Xu R K, et al. Potential of industrial byproducts in ameliorating acidity and aluminum toxicity of soils under tea plantation[J].Pedosphere,2010,20(5):645-654.

吴道铭,傅友强,于智卫,等.我国南方红壤酸化和铝毒现状及防治[J].土壤,2013,45(4):577-584.

Uchimiya M, Wartelle L H, Klasson K T, et al. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on biochar property and function as a heavy metal sorbent in soil[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2011,59(6):2501-2510.

浏览量

732

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

东北黑土地保护成效、土壤酸化问题及其对策建议

不同物料蚓粪对土壤酸度和Cu、Pb化学形态的影响

电渗析与酸淋洗模拟紫色土酸化的效果比较

生物炭对不同酸化水平稻田土壤性质和重金属Cu、Cd有效性影响