1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 草业生态系统教育部重点实验室, 甘肃省草业工程实验室, 中-美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心,兰州,730070
2. 甘肃省草原技术推广总站,兰州,730000
[ "李强(1990-),男,在读博士研究生,主要从事草地资源与生态研究。E-mail:1245524440@qq.com" ]
网络首发:2022-05-27,
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
李强, 何国兴, 刘志刚, 等. 东祁连山高寒草甸土壤“固-液-气”三相组成对海拔和坡向的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):195-200.
LI Qiang, HE Guoxing, LIU Zhigang, et al. Response of Three-Phase Composition of Soil "Solid-Liquid-Gas" to Altitude and Slope Aspects in Alpine Meadow of the Eastern Qilian Mountains[J]. 2022, 36(3): 195-200.
李强, 何国兴, 刘志刚, 等. 东祁连山高寒草甸土壤“固-液-气”三相组成对海拔和坡向的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):195-200. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.028.
LI Qiang, HE Guoxing, LIU Zhigang, et al. Response of Three-Phase Composition of Soil "Solid-Liquid-Gas" to Altitude and Slope Aspects in Alpine Meadow of the Eastern Qilian Mountains[J]. 2022, 36(3): 195-200. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.028.
为探究不同海拔和坡向下高寒草甸土壤"固—液—气"三相组成变化特征
以东祁连山高寒草甸为研究对象
分析了不同海拔(2 800
3 000
3 200
3 400
3 600
3 800
4 000 m)、坡向(阳坡、阴坡)高寒草甸的植被特征和土壤物理特征
结合植被指标拟合探讨高寒草甸"固—液—气"三相的最佳组成比例。结果表明:植被盖度、草层高度和地上生物量均随海拔升高呈先升高后降低
在海拔3 200 m处达最大值
同一海拔的阴坡植被盖度、草层高度、地上生物量均高于阳坡;土壤容重随海拔和坡向的变化规律与植被盖度相反
而土壤含水量、孔隙度和持水性变化规律与植被盖度类似;经方程拟合发现
土壤"固—液—气"三相比例为31∶33∶36时
高寒草甸生产力最优。综上所述
在海拔3 200 m处是东祁连山高寒草甸分布的中心典型区域
海拔和坡向是影响高寒草甸土壤物理质量和"固—液—气"三相组成的重要环境因子
且该区域高寒草甸土壤"固—液—气"最佳比例为31∶33∶36。
In order to explore the variation characteristics of the three phase composition of soil "solid-liquid-gas" in alpine meadow at different altitudes and slope aspects
the alpine meadow in eastern Qilian Mountain was taken as the research object
and the vegetation characteristics and soil physical characteristics of alpine meadow at the different altitudes (2 800
3 000
3 200
3 400
3 600
3 800 and 4 000 m) and aspects (sun slope
shady slope) were analyzed. Combined with vegetation index fitting
the optimal composition ratio of the "solid-liquid-gas" three phase of alpine meadow was explored. The results showed that the vegetation coverage
grass layer height and aboveground biomass increased first and then decreased with the increasing of altitude
and reached the maximum at 3 200 m. At the same altitude
the vegetation coverage
grass layer height and aboveground biomass on the shady slope were higher than those on the sunny slope. The variation law of soil bulk density with altitude and slope aspect was opposite to that of vegetation coverage
while the variation laws of soil water content
porosity and water holding capacity were similar to that of vegetation coverage. After equation fitting
the productivity of the alpine meadow was the best when the soil "solid-liquid-gas" three phase ratio was 31:33:36. In conclusion
3 200 m was the central typical area of the distribution of alpine meadow in the eastern Qilian Mountains. The altitude and slope aspect were important environmental factors affecting the soil physical quality of the alpine meadow and the "solid-liquid-gas" three-phase composition. The optimum ratio of "solid-liquid-gas" in meadow soil in this area was 31:33:36.
李慧,高志强,薛建福.夏闲期耕作对旱地麦田土壤物理质量的影响[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,38(2):15-21.
祁泽伟,张慧芋,李娜娜,等.不同秋耕措施对黄土高原春玉米田土壤物理质量的影响[J].土壤,2021,53(4):826-832.
刘玉祯,刘文亭,董全民,等.坡向和海拔对高寒山地草甸植被分布格局特征的影响[J].草地学报,2021,29(6):1166-1173.
李强,柳小妮,张德罡,等.祁连山自然保护区不同草地类型地上生物量和土壤微量元素特征分析[J].草原与草坪,2021,41(3):48-56.
Li Q, Yang J Y, Liu X N, et al. Soil fertility evaluation and spatial distribution of grasslands in Qilian Mountains Nature Reserve of eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].Peer J,2021(9):e10986.
Fang Y P, Zhao C, Ding Y J, et al. Impacts of snow disaster on meat production and adaptation:An empirical analysis in the yellow river source region[J].Sustainability Science,2016,11(2):249-260.
张玉琪,吴玉鑫,李强,等.东祁连山不同退化程度高寒草甸土壤氮素与团聚体特征及关系研究[J].草地学报,2021,29(10):2286-2293.
李红琴,吴夏璐,张法伟,等.高寒草甸冬季牧场土壤持水能力对草地封育的响应[J].中国草地学报,2021,43(8):1-8.
马海霞.不同利用方式和坡位变化对高寒草甸保水固土的影响[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2021.
孟泽昕.不同海拔高度青藏高寒草地生态系统多功能性评估[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021.
申新山,魏志玲,向宇宸,等.不同海拔梯度高寒草甸土基本理化指标及氮素的变化动态[J].中国水土保持,2020(10):57-59.
吕宸,龚伟,车明轩,等.海拔和坡向对高寒灌丛草甸凋落物水源涵养功能的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(6):219-225,243.
中国科学院南京土壤研究所物理研究室.土壤物理性质测定法[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.
Chen H Y H, Biswas S R, Sobey T M, et al. Reclamation strategies for mined forest soils and overstory drive under story vegetation[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2018,55(2):926-936.
Busch V, Klaus V H, Penone C, et al. Nutrient stoichiometry and land use rather than species richness determine plant functional diversity[J].Ecology and Evolution,2018,8(1):601-616.
金章利,刘高鹏,周明涛,等.喀斯特山地草地群落多样性海拔特征及土壤理化性质特征[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(4):661-668.
王彦龙,王晓丽,马玉寿.坡向对长江源区高寒草地植被生长和土壤养分特征的影响[J].草业科学,2018,35(10):2336-2346.
刘西刚,王勇辉,焦黎,等.夏尔希里自然保护区草地表层土壤理化性质与海拔高度的关系[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(6):773-780.
马国飞,满苏尔·沙比提,靳万贵.天山南坡台兰河上游草地土壤理化性质与海拔的关系研究[J].土壤通报,2017,48(3):597-603.
Javid A D, Sundarapandian S. Altitudinal variation of soil organic carbon stocks in temperate forests of Kashmir Himalayas, India[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2015,187(2):e11.
Shamsher A, Hussain I, Hussain S, et al. Effect of altitude on forest soil properties at Northern Karakoram[J].Eurasian Soil Science, 2019,52(10):1159-1169.
Ai Z M, He L R, Xin Q, et al. Aspect affects the nonstructural carbohydrates and C:N:P stoichiometry of Artemisia sanctorum on the Loess Plateau in China[J].Catena,2017,152:9-17.
Zhou X J, Ke T, Li S G, et al. Induced biological soil crusts and soil properties varied between aspect, aspect gradient and plant canopy in the Hobq desert of China[J].Catena,2020,190:e104559.
吴建国.高产麦田土壤固、液、气三相变化初步测定[J].河南农林科技,1981(1):9-11.
牛钰杰.青藏高原东缘高寒草地裂缝分布、发生机理及生态学效应研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2020.
0
浏览量
778
下载量
12
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621