滇池流域不同植被覆盖土壤的入渗特征及其影响因素

何苗苗; 刘芝芹; 王克勤; 雷祖团

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.026

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

滇池流域不同植被覆盖土壤的入渗特征及其影响因素

更新时间：2026-04-09

- 滇池流域不同植被覆盖土壤的入渗特征及其影响因素
- Soil Infiltration Characteristics and Influencing Factors Under Different Vegetation Cover Types in Dianchi Lake Basin
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第3期页码：181-187
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "何苗苗(1999-),女,本科生,主要从事森林水文研究。E-mail:1076009148@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(20200015);国家自然科学基金项目(41761098);云南省高校优势特色重点学科(生态学)建设项目
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.026
  中图分类号：
- 网络首发：2022-05-27，
  
  纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
何苗苗, 刘芝芹, 王克勤, 等. 滇池流域不同植被覆盖土壤的入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):181-187.

HE Miaomiao, LIU Zhiqin, WANG Keqin, et al. Soil Infiltration Characteristics and Influencing Factors Under Different Vegetation Cover Types in Dianchi Lake Basin[J]. 2022, 36(3): 181-187.
何苗苗, 刘芝芹, 王克勤, 等. 滇池流域不同植被覆盖土壤的入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):181-187. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.026.

HE Miaomiao, LIU Zhiqin, WANG Keqin, et al. Soil Infiltration Characteristics and Influencing Factors Under Different Vegetation Cover Types in Dianchi Lake Basin[J]. 2022, 36(3): 181-187. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.026.

摘要

为掌握滇中高原滇池流域周边不同植被覆盖类型对土壤入渗性能的影响

选用双环入渗法探究土壤入渗特性。以滇池流域典型植被覆盖类型(华山松+云南油杉混交林、云南松纯林、旱冬瓜+麻栎混交林、桉树人工林、灌木林)为研究对象

通过野外调查和试验测定

揭示土壤入渗特性及影响入渗的特征因子。结果表明:(1)华山松+云南油杉混交林与云南松纯林、旱冬瓜+麻栎混交林、桉树人工林、灌木林相比

[JP]土壤容重最小

有机质含量最高

水稳性团聚体最多

孔隙度和非毛管孔隙度比例明显优于其他林地。(2)5种植被覆盖类型下入渗性能有明显差别

具体入渗性能表征为华山松+云南油杉混交林＞旱冬瓜+麻栎混交林＞灌木林＞云南松纯林＞桉树人工林。(3)选择Kostiakov公式、Horton公式、Philip公式

模拟5种典型植被类型覆盖下林地土壤入渗过程

Philip模型对滇池流域土壤入渗过程的拟合效果最佳。(4)5种典型植被类型覆盖下

林地土壤入渗特征与土壤容重均呈显著负相关(P＜0.05)

初始入渗速率与非毛管孔隙度、＞5 mm水稳性团聚体、＞2 mm水稳性团聚体均呈极显著正相关(P＜0.01);土壤入渗的5个主要影响因子为＞2 mm水稳性团聚体、＞5 mm水稳性团聚体、容重、有机质、非毛管孔隙度。研究结果为该研究区水土流失治理和土壤侵蚀防治提供基础依据。

Abstract

In order to master the effects on soil infiltration performance of different vegetation cover types around Dianchi Lake Basin in Central Yunnan Plateau

double ring infiltration method was used to explore soil infiltration characteristics. Taking the typical vegetation cover types ofPinus armandiiFranch.+ Keteleeria evelynianaMast.mixed forest

Pinus yunnanensispure forest

Alnus nepalensisD. Don + Quercus acutissimaCarruth.mixed forest

Eucalyptus robustaSmith artificial forest and shrub forest in Dianchi Lake Basin as the research objects

soil infiltration characteristics and its influencing were studied through field investigation and experimental measure. The results showed that:(1) Compared with P. yunnanensis pure forest

A. nepalensisD. Don + Q. acutissimaCarruth.mixed forest and E. robustaSmith artificial forest and shrub forest

P. armandiiFranch.+ K. evelynianaMast.mixed forest had the lowest soil bulk density

the highest content of organic matter

the most water stable aggregates

and the proportion ofporosity and non capillary porosity. (2) Soil infiltration performance significantly differed under different vegetation cover types

which listed in the following order:P. armandiiFranch.+ K. evelynianaMast. mixed forest > A. nepalensisD. Don+ Q. acutissimaCarruth.mixed forest > shrub forest > P. yunnanensispure forest > E. robustaSmith artificial forest. (3) Kostiakov formula

Horton formula

and Philip formula were selected to simulate the soil infiltration process of forest land under five typical vegetation types. Through data comparison

it could be seen that Philip model had the best fitting effect on the soil infiltration process of Dianchi Lake Basin. (4) Correlation analysis showed that there was a significant negative correlation between soil infiltration characteristics and soil bulk density under five typical vegetation types (P<0.05)

and there were significant positive correlations between initial infiltration rate and non-capillary porosity

>5 mm water stable aggregate content

and >2 mm water stable aggregate content (P<0.01). Principal component analysis showed that the five main influencing factors of soil infiltration were >2 mm water stable aggregate content

>5 mm water stable aggregate content

bulk density

organic matter

and non-capillary porosity. The research results could provide a basis for soil erosion control and soil erosion control in the study area.

关键词

Keywords

references

王珊珊,毕华兴,刘俊,等.晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):231-237,243.

Rossi M J,Ares J O,Jobbagy E G,et al. Vegetation and terrain drivers of infiltration depth along a semiarid hillslope[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,644:1399-1408.

宋爱云,董林水,刘世荣,等.不同亚高山草甸群落类型的土壤入渗特征及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):41-45.

陈娟,陈林,宋乃平,等.荒漠草原不同土壤类型水分入渗特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):18-23.

刘芝芹,黄新会,王克勤.金沙江干热河谷不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):57-62.

侯鹏飞.城镇化背景下滇池叶绿素a浓度时空变化特征研究[D].昆明:云南师范大学,2020.

杨建辉.晋陕黄土高原沟壑型聚落场地雨洪管控适地性规划方法研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2020.

陈楚楚,刘芝芹,王克勤,等.高原湿地碧塔海周边典型植被类型的土壤水分特征[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):222-226,232.

赵丽芳,于晓菲,于军,等.有机肥料中有机质的测定及影响因素[J].石化技术,2018,25(5):31-33.

Mohammadzadeh H J, Khalili D. Development of the Green-Ampt infiltration rate model and relationship of the GA model parameters with soil hydraulic parameters[J].Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,2021,26(11):e2130.

冯锦萍.区域尺度上土壤入渗模型特征参数传输函数的研究[D].太原:太原理工大学,2017.

孙娜.河套灌区畦田土壤水分入渗特性及入渗模型参数预测[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2019.

桑非凡,宋孝玉.黄土高原沟壑区土壤水分入渗模型适用性探讨[J].灌溉排水学报,2014,33(增刊1):183-185.

阿茹·苏里坦,常顺利,张毓涛,等.天山林区不同群落土壤水分入渗特性的对比分析与模拟[J].生态学报,2019,39(24):9111-9118.

张莉.杉木-厚朴人工混交林与杉木纯林生物量对比[J].安徽农学通报,2019,25(9):55-56.

赵洛琪,付登高,吴晓妮,等.滇中不同植物群落土壤养分及其计量比的变化特征[J].土壤,2020,52(6):1248-1255.

王日敏.桉树人工林于环境的作用及其生长因素的影响探讨[J].科学之友,2013(10):162-163.

林代杰,郑子成,张锡洲,等.不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(1):33-36.

何相宜.江西大岗山杉木人工林和毛竹林土壤肥力特征及影响因素[D].北京:北京林业大学,2019.

王佳坤.砒砂岩土壤水分入渗特征及适用模型研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2020.

赖坡,程圣国,陈勇,等.降雨入渗模型的研究方法综述[J].山西建筑,2016,42(26):71-73.

浏览量

1100

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土丘陵沟壑区植物根系对土壤优先流的影响机理

基于MDS的滇池流域5种典型林分土壤质量评价

喀斯特槽谷区岩层倾向对土壤入渗特性的影响

黄河中游典型流域近60年水沙变化趋势及影响因素

山东石灰岩山地不同林分类型土壤入渗特征研究