1. 华北水利水电大学测绘与地理信息学院,郑州,450045
2. 黄河水利科学研究院, 水利部黄土高原水土保持重点实验室,郑州,450003
[ "王凯利(1997-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:2529500133@qq.com" ]
网络首发:2022-05-27,
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
王凯利, 王志慧, 肖培青, 等. 气候与下垫面变化对黄土高原蒸散发变化的影响评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):166-172.
WANG Kaili, WANG Zhihui, XIAO Peiqing, et al. Assessment on the Impact of Climate and the Changes of Underlying Surface on the Evapotranspiration in the Loess Plateau[J]. 2022, 36(3): 166-172.
王凯利, 王志慧, 肖培青, 等. 气候与下垫面变化对黄土高原蒸散发变化的影响评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):166-172. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.024.
WANG Kaili, WANG Zhihui, XIAO Peiqing, et al. Assessment on the Impact of Climate and the Changes of Underlying Surface on the Evapotranspiration in the Loess Plateau[J]. 2022, 36(3): 166-172. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.024.
为了揭示近20年黄土高原蒸散发(evapotranspiration
ET)时空变化规律
明晰气候和下垫面变化对蒸散发的影响作用。基于黄土高原295个气象站数据、PML_V2 ET产品及MOD13A1 EVI产品
采用趋势分析和多元回归分析等统计方法
分析了2000—2018年黄土高原蒸散发时空变化特征
并评估了降雨、温度、日照时间、饱和水汽压差、植被和非植被下垫面等影响要素的相对贡献率。结果表明:(1)2000—2018年黄土高原蒸散发年际变化率为4.47 mm/a
62.8%的区域蒸散发呈显著增加趋势
主要分布在山西、青海、陕西省北部地区;不同土地覆盖ET为森林>农田>草地>灌木。(2)植被显著增加是黄土高原ET变化的主导因子
其相对贡献率最大(32.1%);不同气象要素对黄土高原ET相对贡献率大小为降雨(14.6%)>饱和水汽压差(13.2%)>温度(12.4%)>日照时数(10.0%);非植被下垫面变化(水土保持工程措施等)对ET变化的影响作用不容忽视。(3)气象要素和增强型植被指数(enhanced vegetation index
EVI)对林草覆被ET影响作用>农田覆被ET
而非植被下垫面要素对农田覆被ET的影响作用较大。研究结果为黄土高原生态建设、水资源消耗恢复和水资源可持续性评价提供科学支撑。
This study aimed to reveal the spatial-temporal variation of evapotranspiration (ET) in the loess Plateau during the past two decades and clarify the effects of climate and underlying surface changes on ET. Based on the data of 295 meteorological stations on the Loess Plateau
PML_V2 ET products and MOD13A1 EVI products
this study used trend analysis and multiple regression statistical methods to study the spatial-temporal variation characteristics of ET from 2000 to 2018
and the relative contributions of rainfall
temperature
sunshine duration
vapor pressure difference
vegetation and non-vegetation underlying surface were also quantitatively evaluated. The results showed that:(1) From 2000 to 2018
the annual change rate of ET on the Loess Plateau was 4.47 mm/a. The ET increased significantly in Shanxi
Qinghai and northern Shaanxi Provinces
accounting for 62.8% of the total area. The contribution of different land covers to ET was forest
farmland
grassland and shrub in descending order. (2) The significant increase of vegetation was the leading factor of ET changes in the Loess Plateau
and its relative contribution rate was the largest (32.1%). The relative contribution rates of different meteorological factors to ET from high to low were rainfall (14.6%)
saturated vapor pressure difference (13.2%)
temperature (12.4%) and sunshine duration (10.0%). The influence of non-vegetation underlying surface change (such as soil and water conservation engineering measures) on ET change could not be ignored.(3) The effects of meteorological factors and enhanced vegetation index on ET of forest and grass cover were greater than that of farmland cover
while non vegetation underlying surface elements had a greater impact on ET of farmland cover. The research results are expected to provide scientific support for water resources consumption
restoration and sustainability evaluation of ecological construction in the Loess Plateau.
韩典辰,张方敏,陈吉泉,等.半干旱区草地站蒸散特征及其对气象因子和植被的响应[J].草地学报,2021,29(1):166-173.
刘晓燕,刘昌明,杨胜天,等.基于遥感的黄土高原林草植被变化对河川径流的影响分析[J].地理学报,2014,69(11):1595-1603.
李宗善,杨磊,王国梁,等.黄土高原水土流失治理现状、问题及对策[J].生态学报,2019,39(20):7398-7409.
赵广举,穆兴民,田鹏,等.黄土高原植被变化与恢复潜力预测[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):205-212.
Liu Y, Miao H T, Huang Z, et al. Soil water depletion patterns of artificial forest species and ages on the Loess Plateau (China)[J].Forest Ecology Management,2018,417(15):137-143.
Jin Z, Liang W, Yang Y T, et al. Separating vegetation greening and climate change controls on evapotranspiration trend over the Loess Plateau[J].Scientific Reports,2017,7(1):e8191.
He G H, Zhao Y, Wang J H, et al. Attribution analysis based on Budyko hypothesis for land evapotranspiration change in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Arid Land,2019,11(6):939-953.
Ning T T, Li Z, Liu W Z. Vegetation dynamics and climate seasonality jointly control the interannual catchment water balance in the Loess Plateau under the Budyko framework[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2017,21(3):1515-1526.
赵勇,何国华,李海红,等.基于Choudhury-Yong公式的泾河流域蒸散发归固分析[J].南水北调与水利科技,2019,17(1):8-14.
王雅舒,李小雁,石芳忠,等.退耕还林还草工程加剧黄土高原退耕区蒸散发[J].科学通报,2019,64(增刊):588-599.
Feng X M, Sun G, Fu B J, et al. Regional effects of vegetation restoration on water yield across the Loess Plateau, China[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2012,16(8):2617-2628.
Zastrow M. China's tree-planting drive could falter in a warming world[J].Nature,2019,573(7775):474-475.
袁瑞瑞,黄萧霖,郝璐.近40年中国饱和水汽压差时空变化及影响因素分析[J].气候与环境研究,2021,26(4):413-424.
Zhang Y Q, Kong D D, Gan R, et al. Coupled estimation of 500 m and 8-day resolution global evapotranspiration and gross primary production in 2002-2017[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2019,222(22):165-182.
尚雪,何钊全,张铜会.增强型植被指数时空变化特征及其驱动机理[J].森林与环境学报,2020,40(5):478-485.
赵一蕾,黄文婕,曹明,等.1961-2019年黄土高原植被潜在蒸散及影响因子[J].环境科学研究,2021,34(9):2208-2219.
林楠,姜然哲,刘强,等.近20年三江平原地表蒸散发时空特征及驱动因素分析[J].中国地质,2021,48(5):1392-1407.
金凯,王飞,韩剑桥,等.1982-2015年中国气候变化和人类活动对植被NDVI变化的影响[J].地理学报,2020,75(5):961-974.
Zhang B Q, He C S, Burnham M, et al. Evaluating the coupling effects of climate aridity and vegetation restoration on soil erosion over the Loess Plateau in China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,539:436-449.
Shen M G, Piao S L, Jeong S J, et al. Evaporative cooling over the Tibetan Plateau induced by vegetation growth[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2015,112(30):9299-9304.
Yang H B, Yang D W, Lei Z D, et al. New analytical derivation of the mean annual water-energy balance equation[J].Water Resources Research,2008,44(3):893-897.
邵蕊.黄土高原大规模植被恢复的区域蒸散耗水规律及其生态水文效应[D].兰州:兰州大学,2020.
Zhang M, Yuan X. Crucial role of natural processes in detecting human influence on evapotranspiration by multisource data analysis[J].Journal of Hydrology,2020,580(3):e124350.
郭晓彤,孟丹,蒋博武,等.基于MODIS蒸散量数据的淮河流域蒸散发时空变化及影响因素分析[J].水文地质工程地质,2021,48(3):45-52.
张宝庆,邵蕊,赵西宁,等.大规模植被恢复对黄土高原生态水文过程的影响[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2020,28(3):594-606.
0
浏览量
886
下载量
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621