1. 陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,西安,710119
2. 西安科技大学测绘科学与技术学院,西安,710054
[ "王玉丹(1998-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤保持服务研究。E-mail:wangyd0216@163.com" ]
网络首发:2022-05-27,
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
王玉丹, 李晶, 周自翔, 等. 无定河流域土壤保持服务供需关系及服务流模拟[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):138-145.
WANG Yudan, LI Jing, ZHOU Zixiang, et al. Simulation and Analysis of Supply, Demand and Flow of Soil Conservation Service in the Wuding River Basin, China[J]. 2022, 36(3): 138-145.
王玉丹, 李晶, 周自翔, 等. 无定河流域土壤保持服务供需关系及服务流模拟[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):138-145. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.020.
WANG Yudan, LI Jing, ZHOU Zixiang, et al. Simulation and Analysis of Supply, Demand and Flow of Soil Conservation Service in the Wuding River Basin, China[J]. 2022, 36(3): 138-145. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.020.
土壤保持服务是生态系统服务中调节服务的一项重要内容
无定河流域水土流失严重
土壤保持服务成为其首要的生态系统服务。利用SWAT模型和GIS对无定河流域土壤保持服务供需平衡和空间流动路径进行探究分析
揭示无定河流域土壤保持服务供需空间匹配特征及其空间流转机制。结果表明:(1)无定河流域土壤保持服务供给量与需求量变化趋势具有较强的一致性
两者都呈波动上升的趋势
均与降水具有较强的相互对应关系。其中
2001年8月、2013年7月、2017年7月供给量及需求量达到了2000—2020年所有月份中的较大值
供给量均超过2.5×108 t
需求量则均超过了3.5×108 t。相应地
月均降水量在这3个月也达到了较大值。(2)2000—2020年无定河流域亏损月份多于盈余月份
且亏损量呈增加趋势。中上游地区为盈余状态
供略大于需
中下游地区表现为亏损
且需远大于供;(3)对减沙服务空间流动路径模拟
在此基础上获取了各子流域减沙服务流量及受益量。2000—2020年流域内减沙服务流量波动性增多
尤其2020年在下游地区增长明显;减沙服务受益量在流域内具有累加效益
研究期间总体呈上升趋势。研究结果为流域水土流失治理提供新的视角
对生态修复和水土流失防治政策制定具有重要参考价值。
Soil and water loss is serious in the Wuding River Basin
so soil conservation service becomes the primary ecosystem service. Based on SWAT model and GIS
the balance between supply and demand of soil conservation service and spatial flow path were analyzed to reveal the spatial matching characteristics and spatial flow mechanism of soil conservation service in the Wuding River Basin. The results showed that there was a strong consistency between the supply and the demand of soil conservation service in the Wuding River Basin
and both of them showed a trend of fluctuant increase and had a strong correlation with precipitation. The supply and demand in August 2001
July 2013 and July 2017 reached the larger value in all the months from 2000 to 2020
with the supply exceeding 2.5×108 t and demand exceeding 3.5×108 t. Correspondingly
the monthly average precipitation also reached a large value in these three months. From 2000 to 2020
the deficit months were more than the surplus months
and the deficit was increasing. The middle and upper reaches were in surplus
with the supply slightly greater than the demand
while the middle and lower reaches were in deficit
with the demand far greater than the supply. The spatial flow path of sediment reduction service was simulated. On this basis
the flow and benefit of sediment reduction service in each subbasin were obtained. The fluctuation of sediment reduction service flow increased from 2000 to 2020
especially in the downstream area in 2020. The benefit of sediment reduction service had accumulative benefit in the basin and showed an increasing trend during the study period. The results could provide a new perspective for the control of soil erosion in watershed
and have important reference value for ecological restoration and policy making of soil and water loss control.
Daily G C. Nature's services:Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M].Washington D C, USA:Island Press,1997,12:3-6.
陈登帅,李晶,张渝萌,等.延河流域水供给服务供需平衡与服务流研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(1):112-122.
Zhang C, Li J, Zhou Z X, et al. Application of ecosystem service flows model in water security assessment:A case study in Weihe River Basin, China[J].Ecological Indicators,2021,120:e106974.
易丹,肖善才,韩逸,等.生态系统服务供给和需求研究评述及框架体系构建[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(11):3942-3952.
刘月,赵文武,贾立志.土壤保持服务:概念、评估与展望[J].生态学报,2019,39(2):432-440.
Villamagna A M, Angermeier P L, Bennett E M. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow:A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery[J].Ecological Complexity,2013,15:114-121.
杨丽雯,王大勇,王勇智,等.涑水河流域土壤保持服务供需关系量化评估[J].资源科学,2020,42(12):2451-2462.
徐彩仙,巩杰,燕玲玲,等.甘肃白龙江流域土壤保持服务供需风险时空变化[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(5):1397-1408.
刘立程,刘春芳,王川,等.黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究:以兰州市为例[J].地理学报,2019,74(9):1921-1937.
肖玉,谢高地,鲁春霞,等.基于供需关系的生态系统服务空间流动研究进展[J].生态学报,2016,36(10):3096-3102.
李双成.生态系统服务地理学[M].北京:科学出版社,2014.
赵文武,刘月,冯强,等.人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(1):139-151.
Zheng T, Zhou Z X, Zou Y F, et al. Analysis of spatial and temporal characteristics and spatial flow process of soil conservation service in Jinghe Basin of China[J].Sustainability,2021,13(4):1794-1794.
王勇智.基于服务路径属性网络模型的土壤保持服务空间流动模拟[D].山西临汾:山西师范大学,2019.
梁丽丽.基于SPANs模型土壤保持服务和洪水调控服务供给、需求和服务流的量化评估与制图[D].山西临汾:山西师范大学,2018.
郭姗姗.基于SWAT模型的细河流域土壤侵蚀研究[D].辽宁大连:辽宁师范大学,2019.
荣易,秦成新,杜鹏飞,等.基于模型研究质量评价的SWAT模型参数取值特征分析[J].环境科学,2021,42(6):2769-2777.
Gao H D, Li Z B, Jia L L, et al. Capacity of soil loss control in the Loess Plateau based on soil erosion control degree[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2016,26(4):457-472.
中华人民共和国水利部.土壤侵蚀分类分级标准:SL 190-2007[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.
Tarboton D G. A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models[J].Water Resources Research,1997,33(2):309-319.
Bai J Z, Zhou Z X, Zou Y F, et al. Watershed drought and ecosystem services:Spatiotemporal characteristics and gray relational analysis[J].International Journal of Geoinformation,2021,10(2):1-21.
刘宇,赵亮.基于过程-效应-功能-服务级联机制的森林减沙服务传输研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(4):883-892.
李宗梅,魏锦旺,满旺,等.基于D8算法和Dinf算法的水系提取研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2016,27(5):42-45.
赵阳,刘冰,张晓明,等.极端降雨条件下黄河典型流域水沙变化特性研究[J].泥沙研究,2020,45(6):47-52.
姚海芳,师长兴,邵文伟,等.基于SWAT的内蒙古西柳沟孔兑径流模拟研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(6):139-144.
师长兴.风力侵蚀对无定河流域产沙作用定量分析[J].地理研究,2006,25(2):285-293.
0
浏览量
771
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621