1. 中南林业科技大学林学院,长沙,410018
2. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室,长沙,410125
3. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所 长沙农业环境观测研究站,长沙,410125
4. University of Chinese Academy of[JP]Sciences,Beijing,100049
5. School of Resources and Environment, Hunan Agricultural University,Changsha,410128
[ "邓越(1997-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持、农业面源污染研究。E-mail:599359981@qq.com" ]
网络首发:2022-05-27,
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
邓越, 唐代生, 李裕元, 等. 亚热带典型农林混合流域河岸带景观格局对河流磷输出的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):64-70.
DENG Yue, TANG Daisheng, LI Yuyuan, et al. Influences of Riparian Landscape Pattern on River Phosphorus Output in Typical Subtropical Agroforestry Mixed Watershed[J]. 2022, 36(3): 64-70.
邓越, 唐代生, 李裕元, 等. 亚热带典型农林混合流域河岸带景观格局对河流磷输出的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):64-70. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.010.
DENG Yue, TANG Daisheng, LI Yuyuan, et al. Influences of Riparian Landscape Pattern on River Phosphorus Output in Typical Subtropical Agroforestry Mixed Watershed[J]. 2022, 36(3): 64-70. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.010.
为进一步明确流域河岸带景观尺度范围差异性及对河流磷(P)输出的影响
量化解析河岸带尺度下景观与河流P之间的关系。以亚热带典型农林混合流域为研究对象
基于长期水文、水质监测数据
利用冗余分析明确不同河岸带尺度景观格局特征与不同水文季节河流P浓度的关系
并采用变点分析量化导致丰水期、平枯水期河流P浓度突变的核心景观指数的阈值范围。结果表明:(1)河岸带景观格局对河流P浓度的影响具有显著的空间尺度性特征
300
400 m分别是影响丰水期和平枯水期河流磷浓度变化的关键临界尺度。(2)河岸带居民地斑块最大斑块面积指数(LPI居)和农田斑块分散指数(SPLIT农)分别是影响平枯水期和丰水期河流磷浓度的核心景观格局特征指数
当SPLIT农>15.76~23.83
LPI居<28.8%~36.5%时
能够降低河流P浓度的突变概率。研究结果可为以缓解P面源污染为目标的土地利用和景观规划提供重要理论依据。
In order to further clarify the difference of riparian landscape scale and its impact on river phosphorus (P)
the relationship between landscape and river P at riparian scale was analyzed quantitatively. Based on long-term hydrological and water quality monitoring data
this study used redundancy analysis to clarify the relationship between landscape pattern characteristics at different riparian scales and river P concentrations in different hydrological seasons. Change point analysis was used to quantify the threshold range of the core landscape metrics leading to the abrupt change of river P concentrations in wet and dry seasons. The results showed that:(1) The effects of landscape pattern buffer zones on river P concentration have significant spatial scale characteristics
300 and 400 meters are the critical scales affecting river P concentration in wet season and dry season
respectively. (2) SPLIT of farmland patches (SPLITfarm) and LPI of residential land patches (LPIres) were the core landscape pattern characteristic indexes that affect river P concentration in dry season and wet season respectively. When the SPLITfarm exceeded 15.76~23.83 and LPIre was less than 28.8%~36.5%
the abrupt probability of P concentrations in wet and dry rivers can be reduced respectively. The results can provide important theoretical basis for land use and landscape planning aiming at mitigating P non-point source pollution.
韩路,王海珍,于军.河岸带生态学研究进展与展望[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(5):879-886.
胡琳,李思悦.不同空间尺度土地利用结构与景观格局对龙川江流域水质的影响[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(7):1470-1481.
祁兰兰,王金亮,叶辉,等.滇中"三湖流域"土地利用景观格局与水质变化关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(6):199-208.
王飞,陶宇,欧维新.景观格局变化的水质净化服务响应关系研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2021,36(1):17-28.
Sun Y W, Guo Q H, Liu J, et al. Scale effects on spatially varying relationships between urban landscape patterns and water quality[J].Environmental Management,2014,54(2):272-287.
Shen Z Y, Hou X S, Li W, et al. Impact of landscape pattern at multiple spatial scales on water quality:A case study in a typical urbanised watershed in China[J].Ecological Indicators,2015,48:417-427.
郭羽羽,李思悦,刘睿,等.黄河流域多时空尺度土地利用与水质的关系[J].湖泊科学,2021,33(3):737-748.
徐启渝,王鹏,舒旺,等.不同空间划分方式下袁河流域景观结构对水质的影响[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(12):4325-4337.
李昆,王玲,孙伟,等.城市化下景观格局对河流水质变化的空间尺度效应分析[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(1):343-352.
吴金水,李勇,李裕元,等.亚热带区域农业面源污染流域源头防控机理与技术示范[J].农业现代化研究,2018,39(6):1009-1019.
中华人民共和国环境保护部.HJ 494-2009水质采样技术指导[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2009.
李瀚,邓良基,胡佳,等.成都平原菌渣还田下稻田田面水氮磷动态变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):295-300.
Liu J, Liu X L, Wang Y, et al. Landscape pattern at the class level regulates the stream water nitrogen and phosphorus levels in a Chinese subtropical agricultural catchment[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2020,295:e106897.
Xu G Y, Ren X D, Yang Z H, et al. Influence of landscape structures on water quality at multiple temporal and spatial scales:A case study of Wujiang River Watershed in Guizhou[J].Water,2019,11(1):e159.
Horowitz J L. The bootstrap[M].New York:Norh-Holland,2001.
Qian S S, King R S, Richardson C J. Two statistical methods for the detection of environmental thresholds[J].Ecological Modelling,2003,166(1/2):87-97.
国家环保总局,国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T 3838-2002地表水环境标准[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
Dai X Y, Zhou Y Q, Ma W C, et al. Influence of spatial variation in land-use patterns and topography on water quality of the rivers inflowing to Fuxian Lake, a large deep lake in the plateau of southwestern China[J].Ecological Engineering,2017,99:417-428.
Sponseller R A, Benfield E F, Valett H M. Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities[J].Freshwater Biology,2001,46(10):1409-1424.
王小平,张飞,李晓航,等.艾比湖区域景观格局空间特征与地表水质的关联分析[J].生态学报,2017,37(22):7438-7452.
Carey R O, Migliaccio K W, Li Y, et al. Land use disturbance indicators and water quality variability in the Biscayne Bay Watershed, Florida[J].Ecological Indicators,2011,11(5):1093-1104.
张微微,李晓娜,王超,等.密云水库上游白河地表水质对不同空间尺度景观格局特征的响应[J].环境科学,2020,41(11):4895-4904.
夏品华,孔祥量,喻理飞.草海湿地小流域土地利用与景观格局对氮、磷输出的影响[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(8):2983-2989.
项颂,庞燕,窦嘉顺,等.不同时空尺度下土地利用对洱海入湖河流水质的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(3):876-885.
刘珍环,李正国,杨鹏,等.城市景观组分影响水质退化的阈值研究[J].生态学报,2013,33(2):586-594.
0
浏览量
727
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621