植被缓冲带对乌梁素海区域农业面源污染的削减效果

史中奇; 王猛; 谭军; 丁胜利; 贾冰冰; 刁风伟; 罗俊清; 侯亚州; 王立新; 郭伟

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.008

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

植被缓冲带对乌梁素海区域农业面源污染的削减效果

更新时间：2026-04-09

- 植被缓冲带对乌梁素海区域农业面源污染的削减效果
- Effect of Vegetation Buffer Zone on Reducing Agricultural Non-point Pollution in Wuliangsuhai Lake Basin
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第3期页码：51-56
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 内蒙古大学生态与环境学院, 蒙古高原生态学与资源利用教育部重点实验室, 草原生态安全省部共建协同创新中心, 内蒙古自治区环境污染控制与废物资源化重点实验室,呼和浩特,010070
  2. 内蒙古河套灌区水利发展中心乌拉特分中心,内蒙古,巴彦淖尔,014400
  3. 内蒙古河套灌区水利发展中心乌拉特分中心九排干沟排水所,内蒙古,巴彦淖尔,014400
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "史中奇(1994-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事生态修复与污染控制研究。E-mail:1834076754@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  内蒙古自治区科技重大专项(ZDZX2018054);国家自然科学基金项目(31860170,41977113);内蒙古自然科学基金项目(2018MS04003)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.008
  中图分类号： X522
- 网络首发：2022-05-27，
  
  纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
史中奇, 王猛, 谭军, 等. 植被缓冲带对乌梁素海区域农业面源污染的削减效果[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):51-56.

SHI Zhongqi, WANG Meng, TAN Jun, et al. Effect of Vegetation Buffer Zone on Reducing Agricultural Non-point Pollution in Wuliangsuhai Lake Basin[J]. 2022, 36(3): 51-56.
史中奇, 王猛, 谭军, 等. 植被缓冲带对乌梁素海区域农业面源污染的削减效果[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):51-56. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.008.

SHI Zhongqi, WANG Meng, TAN Jun, et al. Effect of Vegetation Buffer Zone on Reducing Agricultural Non-point Pollution in Wuliangsuhai Lake Basin[J]. 2022, 36(3): 51-56. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.008.

摘要

通过在内蒙古乌拉特前旗乌梁素海九排干岸边构建湖滨植被缓冲带

研究不同盐生植物种类和配置对农业面源污染削减效果的影响。结果表明:无植物空白对照带对径流和渗流水中TN、TP和COD无明显削减规律

芦苇、碱蓬、柽柳和芦苇—碱蓬混播缓冲带随着缓冲带宽度的增加削减率呈先增加后减缓的趋势

渗流水中污染物质的削减效果优于径流水。其中

芦苇对径流和渗流水中TN、TP的削减效果最好

削减率分别为53.56%

79.17%和62.37%

83.25%;碱蓬对径流和渗流水中COD的削减效果最好

削减率分别为50.53%

67.34%。通过计算得到4种植被缓冲带的最佳宽度为19~29 m

其中

碱蓬缓冲带宽度为19 m。综合考虑

可以选择真盐生植物碱蓬作为乌梁素海盐渍化湖滨带植被重建的首选植物

并将植被缓冲带在该地区扩展研究

推广应用。

Abstract

The effects of different halophyte species and configurations on reducing agricultural non-point source pollution were studied by constructing a lakeside vegetation buffer zone on the ninth trunk canal shoreside of Wuliangsuhai Lake

Wulate Front Banner

Inner Mongolia. The results showed that the blank buffer zone without plant had no obvious reduction law of TN

TP and COD in runoff and seepage water. The reduction rates of the Phragmites australisbuffer zone

Suaeda glaucabuffer zone

Tamarix ramosissimabuffer zone

Phragmites australis and Suaeda glauca mixed buffer zone increased first and then slowed down with the increasing of the buffer zone width. The reduction effect of pollutants in seepage water was better than that of runoff water. Among them

P. australis had the best reduction effect on TN and TP in runoff and seepage water

with the reduction rates of 53.56%

79.17% and 62.37%

83.25%

respectively. S. glauca had the best reduction effect on COD in runoff and seepage water

with the reduction rates of 50.53% and 67.34%

respectively. Through calculation

the optimal width of the four vegetation buffer zones were 19~29 m

among which the width of S. glauca buffer zone was 19 m. Considering comprehensively

the true halophyte S. glauca could be selected as the preferred plant for the reconstruction of theWuliangsuhai Lake salinized lakeside

and the vegetation buffer zone could be expanded and applied in this area.

关键词

Keywords

references

Randall N P, Donnison L M, Lewis P J, et al. How effective are on-farm mitigation measures for delivering an improved water environment?A systematic map[J].Environmental Evidence,2015,4(1):e18.

Wang R J, Wang Q B, Dong L S, et al. Cleaner agricultural production in drinking-water source areas for the control of non-point source pollution in China[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2021,285:e112096.

Shi R, Zhao J X, Shi W, et al. Comprehensive assessment of water quality and pollution source apportionment in Wuliangsuhai Lake, Inner Mongolia, China[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2020,17(14):e5054.

管玉玲.乌梁素海流域面源污染负荷入湖量计算[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2020(2):49-52.

孙丽华.乌梁素海流域土壤盐碱化空间分布格局及其影响因素分析[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2014.

Ramesh R, Kalin L, Hantush M, et al. A secondary assessment of sediment trapping effectiveness by vegetated buffers[J].Ecological Engineering,2021,159:e106094.

曹宏杰,焉志远,杨帆,等.河岸缓冲带对氮磷污染消减机理及其影响因素研究进展[J].国土与自然资源研究,2018(3):46-50.

付婧,王云琦,王玉杰,等.不同入流条件下草本缓冲带对污染物削减作用[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):129-134.

United States Department of Agriculture. Code 393 Filter Strip[S].Washington D C:Natural Resources Conservation Service,1.

Valkama E, Usva K, Saarinen M, et al. A meta-analysis on nitrogen retention by buffer zones[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2019,48(2):270-279.

Aguiar J T R, Rasera K, Parron L M, et al. Nutrient removal effectiveness by riparian buffer zones in rural temperate watersheds:The impact of no-till crops practices[J].Agricultural Water Management,2015,149:74-80.

Tian W D, Pei G X, Zhao S N, et al. Seasonal varieties and influential factors of heavy metals in sediments of Wuliangsuhai Lake[J].Water Supply,2020,20(8):3779-3790.

田伟东,贾克力,史小红,等.2005-2014年乌梁素海湖泊水质变化特征[J].湖泊科学,2016,28(6):1226-1234.

国家环保局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997.

梁雄伟.阿什河流域滨岸缓冲带结构设计及功能强化技术[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2017.

Osvaldo S, Claudia R, Fernando A, et al. Inorganic nitrogen losses from irrigated maize fields with narrow buffer strips[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2015,102(3):359-370.

Roberts W M, Stutter M I, Haygarth P M. Phosphorus retention and remobilization in vegetated buffer strips:A review[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2012,41(2):389-399.

王俊华.不同土壤类型地表径流COD污染负荷研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2011.

杨东翰,李本行,张立秋,等.大型溞-沉水植物组合系统削减北京沙河水库水与底泥污染物效果研究[J].环境科学学报,2021,41(1):255-262.

胡威,王毅力,储昭升.草皮缓冲带对洱海流域面源污染的削减效果[J].环境工程学报,2015,9(9):4138-4144.

Wanyama J, Herremans K, Maetens W, et al. Effectiveness of tropical grass species as sediment filters in the riparian zone of Lake Victoria[J].Soil Use and Management,2012,28(3):409-418.

Wu J Q, Xiong L J, Sha C Y. Removal of N, P from seepage and runoff by different vegetated and slope buffer strips[J].Water Science and Technology,2020,82(2):351-363.

Lorna J C, Jenni S, Rachel H. Managing riparian buffer strips to optimise ecosystem services:A review[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2020,296:e106891.

葛瑶,栾明鉴,张雪楠,等.中国盐生植物分布与盐碱地类型的关系[J].齐鲁工业大学学报,2021,35(2):14-20.

Wang L, Wang X, Jiang L, et al. Reclamation of saline soil by planting annual euhalophyte Suaeda salsa with drip irrigation:A three-year field experiment in arid Northwestern China[J].Ecological Engineering,2021,159:e106090.

浏览量

744

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同植被过滤带对农田径流中泥沙和氮磷的拦截效果与途径

氮负载生物炭对干湿交替稻田水土生态环境的调控效应

三峡库区消落带典型草被对氮磷污染物迁移的影响