喀斯特槽谷区岩石与坡面夹角对产流产沙过程的影响

宋兰; 张玉启; 何丙辉; 曾荣昌; 李天阳

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

喀斯特槽谷区岩石与坡面夹角对产流产沙过程的影响

更新时间：2026-04-09

- 喀斯特槽谷区岩石与坡面夹角对产流产沙过程的影响
- Effects of Angle Between Rock and Slope on the Processes of Runoff and Sediment Yield in the Karst Trough Valley Area
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第3期页码：9-15
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "宋兰(1999-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与荒漠化防治研究。E-mail:slan1999@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(41771312);重庆市教委科学技术研究项目(KJQN202100212)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.002
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 网络首发：2022-05-27，
  
  纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
宋兰, 张玉启, 何丙辉, 等. 喀斯特槽谷区岩石与坡面夹角对产流产沙过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):9-15.

SONG Lan, ZHANG Yuqi, HE Binghui, et al. Effects of Angle Between Rock and Slope on the Processes of Runoff and Sediment Yield in the Karst Trough Valley Area[J]. 2022, 36(3): 9-15.
宋兰, 张玉启, 何丙辉, 等. 喀斯特槽谷区岩石与坡面夹角对产流产沙过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(3):9-15. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.002.

SONG Lan, ZHANG Yuqi, HE Binghui, et al. Effects of Angle Between Rock and Slope on the Processes of Runoff and Sediment Yield in the Karst Trough Valley Area[J]. 2022, 36(3): 9-15. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.002.

摘要

为明确喀斯特槽谷区岩石与坡面夹角对坡面产流产沙过程的影响

在6个岩石与坡面夹角(30°

60°

90°

120°

150°

180°)、3个坡度(10°

15°

20°)和3个流量(5

7.5

10 L/min)组合条件下

开展室内放水冲刷试验。结果表明:(1)地表产流率随冲刷历时呈先增加后稳定的趋势

而含沙量和地表产沙率随冲刷历时均呈波动性减小趋势;(2)各岩石与坡面夹角下

地表产流率无显著差异(P＞0.05);但含沙量与地表产沙率均差异显著(P＜0.05)

表现为含沙量和地表产沙率在60°夹角下与30°和120°夹角下差异不显著(P＞0.05)

但显著高于90°

150°和180°条件下的含沙量和地表产沙率(P＜0.05);(3)地表产流率与含沙量在60°

90°

120°夹角下均呈显著幂函数正相关(R2=0.32~0.56

P＜0.05)

而在其他夹角下二者关系不显著(P>0.05)。地表产流率与地表产沙率在60°

90°

120°

150°

180°夹角下呈显著线性正相关(R2=0.35~0.86

P＜0.05)。研究表明喀[JP]斯特槽谷区岩石与坡面呈一定夹角时

可加剧坡面产沙

并改变产流与产沙关系。

Abstract

To elucidate the roles of angle between rock and slope in affecting the processes of runoff and sediment yield in the Karst Trough Valley Area of Southwest China

the combined conditions of 6 angles between rock and slope (30°

60°

90°

120°

150°

180°)

3 slope gradients (10°

15°

20°)

and 3 flow rates (5

7.5

10 L/min) were employed in laboratory scouring simulation experiments. Results showed that:(1) Surface runoff rate increased to be stable with scouring duration

while sediment concentration and sediment yield rate both increased first and then decreased with the scouring duration; (2) Surface runoff rate showed non-significant differences among different angles between rock and slope (P>0.05). Sediment concentration and sediment yield both displayed non-significant differences among the angels of 30°

60° and 120° (P>0.05)

which were significant higher than those angels of 90°

150° and 180° (P<0.05); (3) Surface runoff rate presented significantly positive power relationships with sediment concentration under the angles of 60°

90° and 120° (R2=0.32~0.56

P<0.05)

while exhibited non-significant relationships with sediment concentration at other angles (P>0.05). Similarly

surface runoff rate was significantly linearly correlated with sediment yield at the angles of 60°

90°

120°

150° and 180° (R2=0.35~0.86

P<0.05). Our results show that a certain angle between rock and slope in the slope of the Karst Trough Valley area can accelerate the sediment yield and change the relationship between runoff and sediment yield.

关键词

Keywords

references

史志华,刘前进,张含玉,等.近十年土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究进展与展望[J].土壤学报,2020,57(5):1117-1127.

Hafzullah A, Abdullah G, Murat Y, et al. Soil erosion model tested on experimental data of a laboratory flume with a pre-existing rill[J].Journal of Hydrology,2020,581:e124391.

Be) at the Niesen, Switzerland[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2014,39(9):1153-1166.

杨青,杨广斌,赵青松,等.喀斯特地区不同降雨和植被覆盖的坡面产流产沙特征[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):9-16.

严友进,戴全厚,伏文兵,等.下垫面变化对喀斯特坡地地下产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):67-73,79.

王栋栋,王占礼,张庆玮,等.草地植被覆盖度坡度及雨强对坡面径流含沙量影响试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(15):119-125.

Peng T, Wang S J. Effects of land use, land cover and rainfall regimes on the surface runoff and soil loss on karst slopes in southwest China[J].Catena,2011,90:53-62.

励其其,刘鸿涛,孟岩,等.不同降雨强度和下垫面条件对黑土区坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水利水电技术,2020,51(5):91-98.

Dai Q H, Peng X D, Yang Z, et al. Runoff and erosion processes on bare slopes in the karst rocky desertification area[J].Catena,2017,152:218-226.

Xia L, Song X Y, Fu N, et al. Effects of rock fragment cover on hydrological processes under rainfall simulation in a semi-arid region of China[J].Hydrological Processes,2018,32(6);792-804.

王涵,刘琦,任标,等.典型喀斯特石漠化地区降雨产流产沙特征[J].贵州师范大学学报,2019,37(3):6-12.

Dai Q H, Peng X D, Zhao L S, et al. Effects of underground pore fissures on soil erosion and sediment yield on karst slopes[J].Land Degradation and Development,2017,28(7):1922-1932.

彭旭东,戴全厚,袁应飞,等.喀斯特坡耕地裸坡侵蚀性降雨产流试验研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2019,27(6):1211-1224.

Be-derived denudation rates of the Eastern and Southern European Alps[J].International Journal of Earth Sciences,2011,100(5):1163-1179.

和继军,孙莉英,李君兰,等.缓坡面细沟发育过程及水沙关系的室内试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(10):138-144.

康宏亮,王文龙,薛智德,等.冲刷条件下黄土丘陵区浅沟侵蚀形态及产流产沙特征[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(20):161-170.

曾荣昌,李天阳,何丙辉.喀斯特槽谷区坡面集中水流曼宁系数变化特征[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(4):266-273,279.

李和谋,梁心蓝,赵小东,等.模拟降雨条件下地表起伏对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):99-104.

苏远逸,李鹏,任宗萍,等.坡度对黄土坡面产流产沙过程及水沙关系的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(2):118-122.

张光辉.对土壤侵蚀研究的几点思考[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(4):21-30.

李红,任兵,周明华,等.山地丘陵区小流域次降雨产流产沙过程研究[J].中国水土保持,2020(3):40-43.

王玲玲,姚文艺,王文龙,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区多尺度地貌单元输沙能力及水沙关系[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):120-126.

浏览量

872

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

岩面附着苔藓生物膜对石芽-溶沟坡地产流产沙过程影响的模拟试验

土壤结皮对乌拉山矿山废弃地客土坡面侵蚀特征的影响

水土保持措施对密云板栗林坡面产流产沙的影响

桂西北喀斯特区石灰土与红壤坡地幼龄橘园降雨侵蚀特征

套种药材对红壤坡地幼龄油茶园产流产沙及氮磷流失的影响